Fighting Illini Forums

Fighting Illini Forums (http://www.illinoisloyalty.com/Forums/index.php)
-   Fighting Illini Basketball (http://www.illinoisloyalty.com/Forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Bruce Weber on the Hot Seat - Possible Coaching Replacements (http://www.illinoisloyalty.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=17593)

WesterveltVictoryCigar Feb 13, 2012 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icasaman (Post 526565)
Always surprised that with all the talk of Smart that Anthony Grant doesn't get more conversation.

He's not exactly been impressive at Alabama and is already making more than Weber so wouldn't come cheap. Not a terrible choice, but pretty far down on my list.

job71188 Feb 13, 2012 11:30 AM

I think Illinois should consider Thompson III (Georgetown) and Frank Martin (Kansas State). Both are making $1.5mm or less.

Throwing $2.2 million a year at them should at least grab their attention. Worst case is they use us to get a well deserved raise and stay at their school. Best case they jump and we get a great coach.

ChiIllini05 Feb 13, 2012 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by job71188 (Post 526688)
I think Illinois should consider Thompson III (Georgetown) and Frank Martin (Kansas State). Both are making $1.5mm or less.

Throwing $2.2 million a year at them should at least grab their attention. Worst case is they use us to get a well deserved raise and stay at their school. Best case they jump and we get a great coach.


Hard to think that Thompson would leave Georgetown. School is his family's coaching home. And idk about Martin, the guy is a screamer, the exact type of coach that the modern generation of kids is one bad losing streak away from tuning out. Not to mention he isn't that great of a recruiter

Hugh Jorgen Feb 13, 2012 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhogday (Post 526152)
Howard hasn't owned Chicago as an assistant coach so it is hard to imagine he would own it as a head coach.

Any new head coach would hire an assistant like Howard, with strong ties to Chicago, to recruit the city. Most new coaches would do everything possible to retain Jerrance Howard.

Seriously...it is IMPOSSIBLE for any assistant coach to own anything given that they are limited (or enhanced) by the Head Coach that governs them. All recruits, families, h.s. and AAU coaches realize the same thing.

We've lost more than one big time Top 50 recruits in the past 5 years merely because they didn't relate to/like BW. Crandall Head LOVED Jerrance and vice versa, but CH didn't enjoy playing for BW who is the coach. JH can win over recruits big time, but he is still handcuffed by BW and the system he has chosen to religiously implement...JH can't change that.

The Sprouting Divot Feb 13, 2012 11:57 AM

I love having a personality like Frank Martin prowling the sidelines of college basketball. He's one of those guys that makes it fun to root for a team you otherwise don't care about in any way.

That being said, I don't want him anywhere near our sidelines.

He would have absolutely dominated as Frank Haith's replacement at Miami, and yet they never reached out to him due to his scandalous past. Keep in mind that the whole "booster pays for strippers and abortions and everything else" scandal hadn't broken in April when UM was looking for coaches. I can't recall the timeline of everything, so perhaps the athletic department knew that the story was going to break eventually and that made them gunshy about contacting Martin, but who knows...

That being said, even without the advance knowledge of trouble brewing on the horizon, hiring Frank Martin would make any compliance department a little uneasy.

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/ripti...mi_scandal.php

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/ripti...rtin_the_k.php

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/ripti...candal_w_1.php

http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/ripti...ller_bryan.php

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/1998-03...ws/dream-team/

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2011-02...ruiting-rules/

KBLEE Feb 13, 2012 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by job71188 (Post 526688)
I think Illinois should consider Thompson III (Georgetown) and Frank Martin (Kansas State). Both are making $1.5mm or less.

+1

I Hate Lemonier Feb 13, 2012 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Jorgen (Post 526706)
Seriously...it is IMPOSSIBLE for any assistant coach to own anything given that they are limited (or enhanced) by the Head Coach that governs them. All recruits, families, h.s. and AAU coaches realize the same thing.

We've lost more than one big time Top 50 recruits in the past 5 years merely because they didn't relate to/like BW. Crandall Head LOVED Jerrance and vice versa, but CH didn't enjoy playing for BW who is the coach. JH can win over recruits big time, but he is still handcuffed by BW and the system he has chosen to religiously implement...JH can't change that.

Agreed 100%

ChiIllini05 Feb 13, 2012 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Jorgen (Post 526706)
Seriously...it is IMPOSSIBLE for any assistant coach to own anything given that they are limited (or enhanced) by the Head Coach that governs them. All recruits, families, h.s. and AAU coaches realize the same thing.

We've lost more than one big time Top 50 recruits in the past 5 years merely because they didn't relate to/like BW. Crandall Head LOVED Jerrance and vice versa, but CH didn't enjoy playing for BW who is the coach. JH can win over recruits big time, but he is still handcuffed by BW and the system he has chosen to religiously implement...JH can't change that.


Exactly. When you see how they ultimately end up in BW's system, it makes you realize how good of a recruiter Howard is to get them to come here in the first place.

Botb9 Feb 13, 2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Jorgen (Post 526706)
Seriously...it is IMPOSSIBLE for any assistant coach to own anything given that they are limited (or enhanced) by the Head Coach that governs them. All recruits, families, h.s. and AAU coaches realize the same thing.

We've lost more than one big time Top 50 recruits in the past 5 years merely because they didn't relate to/like BW. Crandall Head LOVED Jerrance and vice versa, but CH didn't enjoy playing for BW who is the coach. JH can win over recruits big time, but he is still handcuffed by BW and the system he has chosen to religiously implement...JH can't change that.

On the other hand, I don't believe MT should be choosing a coach based on what the talkers in Chicago want. So, what if say, Shaka Smart is not the guy those folks like? Will we continue to be left holding the bag on big-time recruits?

MT's job is not just the coach; he has to make this program have an appeal on its own, regardless of who the coach is.

I Hate Lemonier Feb 13, 2012 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiIllini05 (Post 526716)
Exactly. When you see how they ultimately end up in BW's system, it makes you realize how good of a recruiter Howard is to get them to come here in the first place.

That is why I argue Howard has been an exceptional recruiter during his time here. Bruce is a giant anchor around any recruiters neck. He isn't the type of guy who recruits will immediately relate to and our on court success hasn't been high enough to overcome his lack of personality in regards to recruits.

I Hate Lemonier Feb 13, 2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botb9 (Post 526720)
On the other hand, I don't believe MT should be choosing a coach based on what the talkers in Chicago want. So, what if say, Shaka Smart is not the guy those folks like? Will we continue to be left holding the bag on big-time recruits?

MT's job is not just the coach; he has to make this program have an appeal on its own, regardless of who the coach is.

I don't think he is saying pander to Chicago rather give them something to be excited about again

ChiIllini05 Feb 13, 2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I Hate Lemonier (Post 526722)
That is why I argue Howard has been an exceptional recruiter during his time here. Bruce is a giant anchor around any recruiters neck. He isn't the type of guy who recruits will immediately relate to and our on court success hasn't been high enough to overcome his lack of personality in regards to recruits.


Yeah, so imagine what could happen if there are guys like Howard on staff when/if there is a dynamic personality as head coach, like Smart. Imagine those personalities recruiting Chicago. CPL coaches, and other high schools, would love it. Open up the pipeline!

I Hate Lemonier Feb 13, 2012 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiIllini05 (Post 526726)
Yeah, so imagine what could happen if there are guys like Howard on staff when/if there is a dynamic personality as head coach, like Smart. Imagine those personalities recruiting Chicago. CPL coaches, and other high schools, would love it. Open up the pipeline!

It is fun to think about. A dynamic young coach with charisma and skill and a top recruiter like Howard who knows all the ins and outs of the complexities of recruiting this State.

ChiIllini05 Feb 13, 2012 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I Hate Lemonier (Post 526729)
It is fun to think about. A dynamic young coach with charisma and skill and a top recruiter like Howard who knows all the ins and outs of the complexities of recruiting this State.


Definitely. Now the question is that when/if the job comes open, does Smart take it? Are there other programs that would need a new coach that would jump ahead of Illinois on the list? I think this is another moment for Thomas and the rest of the fanbase to assess just where the program is in terms of national perception. You gotta think it's better than football, but I think we're about to find out.

Hugh Jorgen Feb 13, 2012 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Groundhogday (Post 526281)
What is means is that you need other evidence of head coaching ability. Just because a guy is a good recruiter and the players like him doesn't mean he will become a good head coach.

Yep, and it also means that just because a guy has years of head coaching experience that doesn't make him an effective head coach either. There is a fine combination of skills that come into play, and Jerrance may or may not possess them already. Recruiting is a HUGE piece in the puzzle, and I'm telling you right now that JH's success in recruiting will infinitely increase if he is either made head coach, or if he is the primary assistant under another quality head coach. Howard is more than capable of pulling off the quality of recruiting that we've seen O$U have under Matta, if he is not handcuffed by a head coach that is questionable and a system that doesn't appeal to many of today's players.

Problem now is that any elite recruit wants to see tangible proof of a change in style and success on the court, and that takes time. We don't have much more time for the 2013 and 2014 classes unless a change is made immediately. They've all heard the same thing for 6+ years now from BW that "we want to run"...it hasn't happened, and they'll want that tangible evidence, so the change must be quick and evident. :chief:

Kramer116 Feb 13, 2012 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh Jorgen (Post 526745)
Yep, and it also means that just because a guy has years of head coaching experience that doesn't make him an effective head coach either. There is a fine combination of skills that come into play, and Jerrance may or may not possess them already. Recruiting is a HUGE piece in the puzzle, and I'm telling you right now that JH's success in recruiting will infinitely increase if he is either made head coach, or if he is the primary assistant under another quality head coach. Howard is more than capable of pulling off the quality of recruiting that we've seen O$U have under Matta, if he is not handcuffed by a head coach that is questionable and a system that doesn't appeal to many of today's players.

Problem now is that any elite recruit wants to see tangible proof of a change in style and success on the court, and that takes time. We don't have much more time for the 2013 and 2014 classes unless a change is made immediately. They've all heard the same thing for 6+ years now from BW that "we want to run"...it hasn't happened, and they'll want that tangible evidence, so the change must be quick and evident. :chief:

Agree 100%

IlliniSpine Feb 13, 2012 12:58 PM

Replace BW
 
My current list and reasons:

1. Buzz from Marquette - great run and gun offense (would do great with Chicago players), solid recruiter despite his Universities limited resources, young (39) and energetic, does more with less

2. Martin from K state - disciplinarian, solid teams offensively, supposed violations in high school but clean program by all accounts in college

3. Shaka - great energy, but teams are "slow" on offense and rarely score above 65-70. Not sure with more athletic players that he would do better offensively. However, great motivator and has his team in first

4. Stevens - master strategist, great defenses. Again, slow on offense and not sure if he can recruit/work with the Chicago kids.

OrangeFever Feb 13, 2012 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I Hate Lemonier (Post 526722)
That is why I argue Howard has been an exceptional recruiter during his time here. Bruce is a giant anchor around any recruiters neck. He isn't the type of guy who recruits will immediately relate to and our on court success hasn't been high enough to overcome his lack of personality in regards to recruits.

I see things this way, too, though I also acknowledge some recruits and their families have said how much they have liked BW. I don't think it's fair or accurate to characterize him as a "giant anchor" around a recruiter's neck, because were he that much of a negative, I can't imagine Illinois would have had the success it has had in attracting highly ranked recruits. But I do believe he needs a lot of help in the area of recruiting and doesn't have an attractive, upbeat personality, which is something JH has.

Hugh Jorgen Feb 13, 2012 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botb9 (Post 526720)
On the other hand, I don't believe MT should be choosing a coach based on what the talkers in Chicago want. So, what if say, Shaka Smart is not the guy those folks like? Will we continue to be left holding the bag on big-time recruits?

MT's job is not just the coach; he has to make this program have an appeal on its own, regardless of who the coach is.

Very true, but BW is not disliked as a person by the majority of Chicago coaches...the primarily do not like his system and style of play and the results that have been demonstrated over the past couple of years.

Remember, these coaches tried to pull the same thing prior to the BW hire. They will try to establish a measure of authority in the situation, and while MT will do his political part in acknowledging it, he won't let any group dictate what direction he will take in the best interest of our programs. In the end, they will be heard and recognized, we'll hopefully get a quality coach in place, and during the whole mix we'll be in the headlines as it unfolds during the busiest time in college basketball (around the Final Four weekend) to generate publicity and maybe even turn some recruits heads out of curiousity. There is alot of opportunity as regards our basketball program...and alot of good candidates out there. :chief:

HOOPDOG Feb 13, 2012 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackman404 (Post 526167)
If Jerrance is such an amazing coach why are we playing so poorly this year? Jerrance can recruit, we all know that. But if he really had the X's and O's to win in the Big Ten wouldn't we already be winning in the Big Ten? You can try to argue that he does and Weber just doesn't listen to him but I think that's a pretty weak argument. Koehning was still able to put out one helluva defense even though the head coach was way in over his head.

I like Jerrance a lot, and I hope he stays on the staff as our top assistant coach, but I do not think he is ready to be a head coach at a high major program.

I'm going to ride the Shaka Smart bandwagon 'till the end!

Not sure if anyone has touched on this yet or not, BUT...Weber is the coach, not Jerrance. They don't take turns coaching the team. Weber tells the assistance what to do, not the other way around. So we don't have any idea as to whether Jerrance can coach or not. There is only one way to find out.

Hugh Jorgen Feb 13, 2012 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IlliniSpine (Post 526754)
My current list and reasons:

1. Buzz from Marquette - great run and gun offense (would do great with Chicago players), solid recruiter despite his Universities limited resources, young (39) and energetic, does more with less

2. Martin from K state - disciplinarian, solid teams offensively, supposed violations in high school but clean program by all accounts in college

3. Shaka - great energy, but teams are "slow" on offense and rarely score above 65-70. Not sure with more athletic players that he would do better offensively. However, great motivator and has his team in first

4. Stevens - master strategist, great defenses. Again, slow on offense and not sure if he can recruit/work with the Chicago kids.

This is a VERY important facet that is too often overlooked in the success that a coach has over his tenure. If you've ever listened to BW's pregame and halftime speeches, they are incredibly obvious and unmotivating.

One of the worst things I've ever heard from a head coach is what was shared with our '05 squad prior to taking the floor against UNC. For crying out loud, if that was what was going to be shared he might as well have just let them bump Tupac in their iPod's to motivate themselves. Seriously, BW's fist analogy and the lack of enthusiasm behind it may only be surpassed by Quin Snyder's shameful rendition of "Eye of the Tiger".

Being able to motivate a team is paramount, and it is one of the reasons that Tom Izzo has been so successful over his tenure at MSU. :chief:

HOOPDOG Feb 13, 2012 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IlliniSpine (Post 526754)
My current list and reasons:

1. Buzz from Marquette - great run and gun offense (would do great with Chicago players), solid recruiter despite his Universities limited resources, young (39) and energetic, does more with less

2. Martin from K state - disciplinarian, solid teams offensively, supposed violations in high school but clean program by all accounts in college

3. Shaka - great energy, but teams are "slow" on offense and rarely score above 65-70. Not sure with more athletic players that he would do better offensively. However, great motivator and has his team in first

4. Stevens - master strategist, great defenses. Again, slow on offense and not sure if he can recruit/work with the Chicago kids.

I still say we pry Leonard Hamilton away from Florida State

NorthwesternIllini4 Feb 13, 2012 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOOPDOG (Post 526763)
I still say we pry Leonard Hamilton away from Florida State

I'm pretty sure these posts belong in the other thread. Just sayin' :D

IlliniSpine Feb 13, 2012 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOOPDOG (Post 526763)
I still say we pry Leonard Hamilton away from Florida State

Very good coach but he's 63 and in Florida already...just a couple hours from the beach and retirement.

HOOPDOG Feb 13, 2012 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorthwesternIllini4 (Post 526766)
I'm pretty sure these posts belong in the other thread. Just sayin' :D

This isn't the replacement for Weber thread? Seems like every thread in the basketball forum has a list of potential coaches.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2013 IllinoisLoyalty.com All Rights Reserved. This website is not affiliated with any school or team.