|
|
#76 | |
|
Posts: 633
|
Quote:
Evan Turner like? |
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Location: N of I-80
Posts: 973
|
Yeah, I wasn't implying that MH doesn't have a 3 point shot. I just was not aware one way or the other if his range out to 3 was developing/consistent/or a strength. However, I do know that I have read his about his ability to get to the line and his mid-range jumper as strengths. I'm excited to see him in O&B.
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Realist
Posts: 3,155
|
I think it's more like the players in this system are used to taking three-pointers, so the 'take your best shot' mentality works better from three for these guys. In the end, when we have an entirely Groce-recruited class, we'll see more driving to the basket.
__________________ Hype is a self-serving beast that feeds on the hopes and dreams of fans. |
|
|
#80 |
|
Posts: 1,483
|
Bracket that by the fact that Groce's system is dependent on what he has at his disposal. The question is is he restricted in any way and if so what would the system look like were it not to have any restrictions.
__________________ My top 5 are Illinois, Illinois, Illinois, Illinois and Illinois, in no particular order |
|
|
#81 | |
|
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
He doesn't want 15 - 20 foot shots almost ever. Use spacing to create driving lanes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Posts: 193
|
That's exactly what it looks like so far. I hope this will change with the player profile. ~20 attempts per game is a lot, but it is still a 'healthy tendency' rather than the opponents knowing we will almost always go for the 3-pt shot. 30+ attempts from behind the 3-pt line is just excessive. By all means, take them if you are wide open, but to be honest you don't normally get more than 10-12 wide open 3-pt shots per game.
|
|
|
#83 | |
|
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,402
|
Quote:
The idea is they have to choose to pack in the lane or play the three point line. If they stay out on shooters you should be able to get Tracy, Brandon and Joe getting all the way to the hoop. If they collapse in and help on those then you kick out to DJ, Tyler, & Myke. |
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Location: DeKalb IL
Posts: 812
|
With how many 3's it seems we will be taking, why wouldnt we be interested in peyton allen?
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Realist
Posts: 3,155
|
Fit.
__________________ Hype is a self-serving beast that feeds on the hopes and dreams of fans. |
|
|
#86 | |
|
Posts: 633
|
Quote:
My guess is that hes' not a good enough ball handler or defender for Groce's liking. Also he's a 2014 right? I think we have more pressing needs at other positions for that class. |
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Banned
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Posts: 517
|
It certainly allows it. JG's system is based around the dribble drive whether thru isolation or, more frequently, screen and roll/pop. Now off of that the 3 is going to be a popular shot thru drive and kicks, but when Malcolm comes off the screen his game allows for an extra dimension. He can get all the way to the cup for a layup/dunk or draw a foul or take a pull up/mid-range jumper. He can kick out to Nunn or another teammate for 3, or, like we've seen a lot this year with DJ and BP3, come off the pick and fire the 3. That will put the pressure on the defense because a player like Malcolm has a diverse arsenal.
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Location: the paign
Posts: 228
|
Something that bothers me a bit.......I've saw quite a few people either undervaluing or greatly undervaluing our 13 class
Look according to rivals we have three 4* recruits. One nunn that dropped in the rankings because he was busy winning a gold medal for our country. And one hill that dropped in therankings due to an injury that kept him out of AAU ball the entire summer. Plus our other 4* Colbert. Then the other 2 3* in 6'10" 250 pound (no need to go on the 5500 calorie/day tisdale diet) banger. And Tate who was a top 30 or 40 recruit prior to transferring to simeon his junior year. I think his stock is going to skyrocket this year now that he knows simeon's system. I believe both Tate and nunn's stock will skyrocket this year since Parker may not even play this season due to injury. I know as illini fans its hard to get too excited because we think we always get hopes up only to get let down but I seriously think this is a damn good class. Thoughts anyone??? |
|
|
#91 | |
|
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 2,300
|
Quote:
Actually, think all of your comments have been made individually and over a great deal of time, but pulling them all together in one post . . . vehhhrrry interesting. I think you are onto something. Put that together with the fact that it appears that CJG can develop them further and this could be good. Very good. |
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,402
|
Quote:
I expect Nunn to be ready to play right away, and I think he should slide in and be just as good as DJ is immediately, maybe better on defense. I think Hill is a fantastic prospect who may have a slower learning curve but as an upperclassman could lead the team in scoring and potentially be on NBA radars. With the other 3, I think my hopes are that they develop into starters as upperclassmen, but the odds are against them all getting there. At the least, Morgan and Tate should be able to play important backup roles throughout their careers. |
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Location: the paign
Posts: 228
|
Uhhhh did anyone see how bad we got out rebounded against Hawaii?????
I think #1 priority in 14 should be a pure rebounder. I don't care if they are big bodied or small bodied or 6 foot or 7'6". We NEED rebounding. |
|
|
#94 | |
|
Posts: 766
|
Quote:
Agreed. Although losing KBD sucks, our biggest needs in the '14 class are a tough PF/C type and a quality PG. My hope is that we get Alexander, though I know it's not too likely. Add him to what we would have coming back and the '14/15 team could be very good. |
|
|
|
#95 | |
|
Posts: 766
|
Quote:
Amen to that. Year after year, we argue that our recruits are underrated and/or will climb up the rankings. I would think over time, folks would figure out that some of our kids are overrated, some are underrated, and some are rated just about right. Human nature I guess. |
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
Location: Spfld, IL
Posts: 4,410
|
Quote:
Last edited by zoggle101; Nov 19, 2012 at 05:16 PM. |
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Banned
Posts: 210
|
Quote:
Tate im hoping should jump quite a bit in the rankings up to around the 80s due to actually playing this year but I doubt hell climb much farther than that unless he really blows up this year. Morgan is clearly not totally polished if hes rated that lowly but im hoping (key word is hoping) he'll be around 100 rather than 150 by the end of the year but well see. Colbert I bet stays just around where hes at as there havent been any extenuating circumstances and hes already at top 100 player. Finally, for Nunn, if he really did get more bounce and maybe even grew an inch could move up but I doubt we see too much movement. The real thing to remember is that its not rankings but how the players fit into the system and how they develop that really determines how good they are. |
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Posts: 157
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#99 | |
|
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
Posts: 367
|
Quote:
|
|