Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#677      
I'm running with IW to be a complete stud. He's gonna knock our socks off. Can't see all this reasoning to temper our optimism. He's likely to transfer off to Penn State if we starting telling him to take his time learning the play book. Our coaching staff needs to tweak the play book if IW isn't slaying it super quick. Coach Rod is bright enough to find a way. We should stop sweating the thought of IW not breaking into a quick starting role. No PSU leftovers for me!
 
#678      
Beackner,aj,tredwell were all 5 star love was a 3 star

Some quick digging. You mention 4 players but from 2015 Illinois has enrolled 22 players from either Florida or Texas. That is an 18% success rate. Am I missing something? Any good ball player or above will receive a 4 or 5 star if you are from Florida or Texas. You have to be average or below average to receive a 3 star in those states. The opposite is true for the Midwest or the state of Illinois specifically. Not everyone gave Beckner a 5th star and he was rated the number 2 player in the country. A kids really have to earn a 3 star rating if they are from Illinois. Some people treat recruitment as if there is a certain number of 4 and 5 stars players that each state have to give out. They aren't 3 stars because they ran out of 4 and 5 stars in that state. They are 3 stars because they are average and are equivalent or in some cases worse than the 3 stars in Midwestern states.
 
#679      

FT35

Naperville
I'm running with IW to be a complete stud. He's gonna knock our socks off. Can't see all this reasoning to temper our optimism. He's likely to transfer off to Penn State if we starting telling him to take his time learning the play book. Our coaching staff needs to tweak the play book if IW isn't slaying it super quick. Coach Rod is bright enough to find a way. We should stop sweating the thought of IW not breaking into a quick starting role. No PSU leftovers for me!

QB is a developmental position and IW should be given time to develop. If IW was here this Spring then I'd feel better about handing the keys over to him but it's best for everyone if we are patient with him and don't throw him to the lions right away. I don't question his abilities but injuries are always a concern with dual threat QBs which is why I'm okay with having 5 scholarship QBs.

In 2016 we were a snap away from having either Trenard Davis or Cam Miller be our QB. We were also down to a third string QB in 2017.

The risk is really there for whoever decides to transfer here. We should not be guaranteeing the job to anyone but if a guy wants a chance to compete for the job then I don't have an issue with it.
 
#680      
QB is a developmental position and IW should be given time to develop. If IW was here this Spring then I'd feel better about handing the keys over to him but it's best for everyone if we are patient with him and don't throw him to the lions right away. I don't question his abilities but injuries are always a concern with dual threat QBs which is why I'm okay with having 5 scholarship QBs.

In 2016 we were a snap away from having either Trenard Davis or Cam Miller be our QB. We were also down to a third string QB in 2017.

The risk is really there for whoever decides to transfer here. We should not be guaranteeing the job to anyone but if a guy wants a chance to compete for the job then I don't have an issue with it.
All good points FT. Even with the game softening to two-hand-touch these days, QBs get injured too often. But a giant chunk of the development is the timing and the comfort. Those first string reps are crucial. I worry big time that you take a talent like IW and try and convince him he's not ready. I can vouch for his talent, but I can't vouch for his patience and his ego. At some quick point, I think you start going backwards. He'll be a stud this year that we can sit back and enjoy!
 
#681      
All good points FT. Even with the game softening to two-hand-touch these days, QBs get injured too often. But a giant chunk of the development is the timing and the comfort. Those first string reps are crucial. I worry big time that you take a talent like IW and try and convince him he's not ready. I can vouch for his talent, but I can't vouch for his patience and his ego. At some quick point, I think you start going backwards. He'll be a stud this year that we can sit back and enjoy!

There is no convincing people they aren’t ready. This is Big 10 football. The play on the field does the talking. If we have kids that want out because they don’t get handed a starting job immediately, those aren’t the kids to build a program.

IW will be fine. Freshman year starter or not. He wouldn’t have committed to come here if he can’t handle some adversity.
 
#683      
Sadly I doubt it. I feel like we are entering the same time warp as last year after we got Beason and Williams. A lot of buzz for a couple weeks, then nothing until the season started. I feel this year will be the same.
Rumor flying on 247 from a solid poster that something fairly big is on the way in the next couple weeks, fwiw.
 
#685      

Deleted member 654622

D
Guest
Rumor flying on 247 from a solid poster that something fairly big is on the way in the next couple weeks, fwiw.
Would be a nice surprise if so. Otherwise I am just planning on hanging out in the 2019 Football thread until week 3.
 
#686      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
What I am saying is that the staff is interested but not sure he is that much better than our current QBs

If he recovers from his injury(s), then there is absolutely no question that he'd be the best QB on the roster by a fairly comfortable margin. But that's a big "if", and the biggest reason why James Franklin hasn't assured him of the starting job yet.

If he appears to be on track to be ready for opening weekend, then you take him. No questions asked. He's 6'5, 230, and runs like the wind. As a Penn State fan, my biggest problem with Tommy was his run-first mentality. Trace would make terrific decisions in the RPO, and when necessary, hang in the pocket and make throws. Tommy's first instinct was to tuck it and run. And with his size, he could bulldoze over guys. But it's not a very sustainable approach.

He CAN throw the ball downfield. Not nearly as well as Sean Clifford (which I suspect is why Clifford was headed toward potentially winning the PSU job), but probably good enough for Rod Smith's system.

The Miss State connection is due to Joe Moorhead, who ran the offense at Penn State in 2016 and 2017. He would be a perfectly logical replacement for Nick Fitzgerald, though Moorhead prefers somebody who's a bit more pass-oriented than Nick (and probably Tommy as well).
 
#688      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
look at his highlight he look like a rod smith like qb

Yes, he is.

Definitely a run-first guy, but he can certainly spread the ball around and even go downfield. He may not be as fast as IW, but he's much bigger, almost certainly a better passer, and has 3 years of meaningful snaps on a top-10/15 team under his belt. No way we shouldn't at least inquire.
 
#689      
Here's my 2 cents, bring in a grad transfer who can deliver Coach Rod's O. Hopefully the ILLINI will be up by a lot in non-conference games and IW can play his 3 games and take a RS still getting valuable experience.
 
#690      
Fan sided wasn’t listing “favorites.” The article was listing potential landing spots for him. There has been no actual discussion of him considering Illinois or vice versa, at least from what I’ve seen. It’s all been fan speculation.

I would think that guys already on the roster are the first option, following by Tate (if that happens), followed by anyone else. Don’t want to burn a scholly on your third preference when the preference might be to play someone else over him (as 0440 stated). Williams won’t redshirt either way.
Didnt think William's would redshirt, but I read in the article if Steven's came we would have the depth to redshirt him and gee et him the experience of college without wasting a year of eligibility. I think from everything I've seen on William's he will take the starting job relatively quickly if he shows his game translates well in the big ten.. he is just completely gifted with athleticism,intelligent, high football i.q. and he is a legit duel threat q.b with a cannon for an arm as well. Barring m.j rivers or any of the other QBs on the roster having an unforeseen impact or breakout season he will take over the reins.. also with the talent lovie and his team are bringing in I think a bowl game is definitely a reasonable expectation.. so the question comes to mind "if not then who's next" rod smith? My opinion is give lovie another year after this one to see if he and his team can repeat the success in recruiting they had this year... if not and under 6 wins he has to go yea or no?
One final question what is your opinion on tate? Will he come here or not what are your thoughts...
 
#691      

South Farms

near Ogden & Rt 83
are there ever guarantees in sports ?
what coach or manager would be so dumb to say that?
all you can ever promise a guy is opportunity. you can say that if you commit, we aren't taking any other transfers and what you see on our roster is who you have to beat out. obviously, the staff and Rod are not figuring Tate is anything close to a sure thing or even a maybe thing come July.

th
 
#692      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
Yeah, why would we want a Tebow-light? That said, I wouldn't guarantee him the starting job. Competition, which I fully expect him to win.

Yep. He didn't leave Penn State because he wasn't guaranteed the starting job. Even Tommy's dad mentioned that there was never an expectation of being guaranteed anything. However, he saw the writing on the wall with Franklin's "we need a true competition" comment -- Sean Clifford was gaining serious ground, and with Tommy's injury, there was a very good probability that Tommy would lose the #1 position to Clifford. With only one year of eligibility left, Tommy made a calculated decision to go somewhere where his odds of starting were better. Simple as that.

You don't guarantee the kid a starting role, but you paint him an accurate picture and hope that he sees the obvious.
 
#693      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
Yep. He didn't leave Penn State because he wasn't guaranteed the starting job. Even Tommy's dad mentioned that there was never an expectation of being guaranteed anything. However, he saw the writing on the wall with Franklin's "we need a true competition" comment -- Sean Clifford was gaining serious ground, and with Tommy's injury, there was a very good probability that Tommy would lose the #1 position to Clifford. With only one year of eligibility left, Tommy made a calculated decision to go somewhere where his odds of starting were better. Simple as that.

You don't guarantee the kid a starting role, but you paint him an accurate picture and hope that he sees the obvious.

We offer a very good fit. I'll be surprised if we're not one of his finalists.

From our end, what's not to like? QB is not arguably our shakiest position. Stevens is better than Bush (running and passing and game management) was and would fortify our QB situation immensely. Yes, our young uns might be angry and/or sad. So what?
 
#695      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
We offer a very good fit. I'll be surprised if we're not one of his finalists.

From our end, what's not to like? QB is not arguably our shakiest position. Stevens is better than Bush (running and passing and game management) was and would fortify our QB situation immensely. Yes, our young uns might be angry and/or sad. So what?

Meh.....a true freshman like IW can't possibly get angry (at least with any rational justification) over NOT starting right away when you have a 5th year senior like Tommy Stevens in the fold. Unless, of course, he was sold on starting immediately. Would Rivers be angry? Who knows, and who cares.

The difference between Stevens (or another quality transfer QB) and Rivers/Williams is quite possibly the difference between 6-7 wins and 4-5 wins. You win NOW and worry about any hurt feelings later.


Who knows where Stevens is leaning. The Miss State thing is pure speculation on the basis of his ties to Moorhead. However, he's from Indiana, originally committed to IU, and spent the last 4 years in the Big Ten. Illinois has to make sense, as would Indiana or Purdue if either of them feel as though they're not 100% sold on their QB situation. There's also Rutgers, but Illinois is closer to home and, well, at least Illinois isn't Rutgers.
 
#696      
Didnt think William's would redshirt, but I read in the article if Steven's came we would have the depth to redshirt him and gee et him the experience of college without wasting a year of eligibility. I think from everything I've seen on William's he will take the starting job relatively quickly if he shows his game translates well in the big ten.. he is just completely gifted with athleticism,intelligent, high football i.q. and he is a legit duel threat q.b with a cannon for an arm as well. Barring m.j rivers or any of the other QBs on the roster having an unforeseen impact or breakout season he will take over the reins.. also with the talent lovie and his team are bringing in I think a bowl game is definitely a reasonable expectation.. so the question comes to mind "if not then who's next" rod smith? My opinion is give lovie another year after this one to see if he and his team can repeat the success in recruiting they had this year... if not and under 6 wins he has to go yea or no?
One final question what is your opinion on tate? Will he come here or not what are your thoughts...

In January, the likelihood was high. Now, I wouldn’t count on it. His game has improved in the Sumlin system. His relationship with his mentor has gotten strong and Gunnell isn’t ready or competitive against Tate, at the moment. Tate is set up to have a strong season and show his improvement to nfl scouts
 
#698      
Ultimately, I think a full playbook with rivers and Robinson would warrant more time than a partial playbook with Williams. I would bet that Williams gets snaps early and as long as we are winning, there will be no reason to push him to start. I’m happy to be wrong.
Who said IW hasn’t had his hands on a playbook?
 
#700      
bring in a senior QB transfer (tate or tommy) and put him in the backfield with IW 5-10 snaps a game the way penn state ran with two QB's.
have a sit down with Coran and move him to receiver. run three incredibly gifted athletic QB's on the field with Beason and Corbin and watch
Big Ten defenses heads spin around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.