Chicago Cubs 2020 Season

A Legend in My Own Mind
Montgomery, IL
Keith Law is clueless about so much. I wouldn't be surprised if this falls in that category as well.
 
Likes: IanKEvans2
A Legend in My Own Mind
Montgomery, IL
Whether Keith Law is clueless or not, I have a hard time believing baseball would go with a 20 day “Spring” training.

Do they want to injure an entire generation of pitchers?
If they made the announcement this week, pitchers would have more than a month before the June 10 Spring Training Pt2 starts. They could easily throw at home / wherever they currently are. I'm guessing most of them already are throwing. 50+ days should be plenty of time.
 
Chicagoland
I have a friend who works for MLB. What he told me is that the proposal is Spring training at every team's home park beginning June 1, real games July 1 and fans allowed on Aug 1.
 
MLB owners approve plan that would have baseball return by July 4: https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id...-plan-july-start-players-union-preps-weigh-it

Now it's up to the players to approve it.

Among some of the details of the plan:
-An expansion of playoff teams from 10 to 14
-An 82-game season
-The use of home stadiums in areas that have local and state governmental approval
-A so-called spring training 2.0 that begins in June with a season set for early July
-A universal designated hitter
-Geographical schedules, in which teams play only in-division opponents and interleague opponents in a similar area (i.e., American League Central teams play only AL Central and National League Central teams)
-A 30-man roster with a taxi squad that would have upward of 50 players available

It appears that the only team that wouldn't be able to play in their normal home stadium would be Toronto who would be forced to likely play at their spring training home in Dunedin, FL.
 
MLB owners approve plan that would have baseball return by July 4: https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id...-plan-july-start-players-union-preps-weigh-it

Now it's up to the players to approve it.

Among some of the details of the plan:
-An expansion of playoff teams from 10 to 14
-An 82-game season
-The use of home stadiums in areas that have local and state governmental approval
-A so-called spring training 2.0 that begins in June with a season set for early July
-A universal designated hitter
-Geographical schedules, in which teams play only in-division opponents and interleague opponents in a similar area (i.e., American League Central teams play only AL Central and National League Central teams)
-A 30-man roster with a taxi squad that would have upward of 50 players available

It appears that the only team that wouldn't be able to play in their normal home stadium would be Toronto who would be forced to likely play at their spring training home in Dunedin, FL.
I'm going to need a minute to digest all of this information.
 
The players have some legitimate gripes about the compensation framework under this deal. It goes back on a deal they reached with the owners in March that pro-rated salaries based on the % of season played, and instead makes player salary a function of revenues, putting much more of the risk of losses on the players during a season when there may be nearly zero revenue generated from attendance and concessions, which makes up roughly 40% of MLB revenue.

Generally, I side with the players in these situations and this is no exception. If the owners want the players to shoulder a big chuck of the risk, they need to give the players a payout at the end.

Personally, I think a deal will be done and that for 2020 it will look substantially like the proposal, but that the owners will have to make some concessions for 2021 and the future in terms of minimum salary, service time, roster size, etc.

I’m also relatively certain we’ve seen the last pitcher take an AB in a MLB game. It’s going to be DH across the board from here on out.
 
Cary, IL
The players have some legitimate gripes about the compensation framework under this deal. It goes back on a deal they reached with the owners in March that pro-rated salaries based on the % of season played, and instead makes player salary a function of revenues, putting much more of the risk of losses on the players during a season when there may be nearly zero revenue generated from attendance and concessions, which makes up roughly 40% of MLB revenue.

Generally, I side with the players in these situations and this is no exception. If the owners want the players to shoulder a big chuck of the risk, they need to give the players a payout at the end.

Personally, I think a deal will be done and that for 2020 it will look substantially like the proposal, but that the owners will have to make some concessions for 2021 and the future in terms of minimum salary, service time, roster size, etc.

I’m also relatively certain we’ve seen the last pitcher take an AB in a MLB game. It’s going to be DH across the board from here on out.
I tend to side with the owners more than most, however, if the players will take essentially 50% pay cut, due to playing 50% of the games, and full playoff comp, I would have to side with the players here. Most, if not all of the owners are billionaires, they can have a "break-even" season for once. Heck, it will be a write off at tax time.
 
Likes: IanKEvans2
Curious how incentives will be played out. On a scale of 1-100 on my baseball contract knowledge, I'm probably hovering at around a 6, so I don't know how prevalent things like games played, HRs hit, saves, etc. are in contracts, but if they do exist, how would those be affected?

If a guy's got half as many games to hit on an incentive goal, how do they handle it? Prorated like everything else? Maybe that's the obvious answer.
 
Curious how incentives will be played out. On a scale of 1-100 on my baseball contract knowledge, I'm probably hovering at around a 6, so I don't know how prevalent things like games played, HRs hit, saves, etc. are in contracts, but if they do exist, how would those be affected?

If a guy's got half as many games to hit on an incentive goal, how do they handle it? Prorated like everything else? Maybe that's the obvious answer.
Innings pitched is a very common incentive among pitchers. It’s often used as a threshold to vest options. For example, Jon Lester’s 7th year (2021) club option becomes guaranteed if he pitches a combined 400 innings In the 5th (2019) and 6th (2020) years of his contract.

How’s that going to be handled? No clue.

It will be especially complicated in situations like the Jon Lester example where it’s a running total over a series of seasons. He can’t possibly pitch 230 innings in a 82 game schedule. However 130 innings over that stretch would still be unlikely, but not completely out of the realm of possibility.
 
Likes: ChiefIllini
One thing I’m not seeing is a proposed end date to the regular season.

If they start on July 4 and end on the originally planned date of September 27, that would be 82 games in 86 days.

Even with the reduced travel of playing only regional teams, that seems like a near suicidal schedule.

So they push the last game of the season back a week? That would basically give everyone an off day once a week. With no coast-to-coast flights, that seems more manageable.

But then you’re bumping up against winter for your northern teams, and you have a longer playoff season because of the expanded playoff pool. If you’re not starting the best of three Wild Card series until October 6, there’s no way you start the World Series until November 1 at the absolute earliest. Would anyone want to risk having game 7 of the WS on November 9th in Boston or Chicago or Denver?

There’d almost have to be a neutral site World Series, right? Will the Dodgers get it to make up for losing the All Star Game?
 
Likes: IanKEvans2