Fighting Illini Basketball Scholarship Grid 2017-2018

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1
aka Flash Gordon, earthling
Planet Earth, when not battling Ming the Merciless
FightingIllini.com has updated the basketball roster to reflect the upcoming season, so I will follow suit.

Mark Alstork, I understand, is finishing up classes at Wright State this summer, so I will keep him as committed/signed until the fall semester.

Greg Eboigbodin is not shown on the new roster, so I will keep him as committed/verbal until we know that he is enrolled.

 

Attachments

#2
ratdawg
Harrisburg Ilinois
the thing that excites me the most is scholarships 5-10. those together three years... add some playas ... mmmhmmm... not that I dont like the 1-4 guys, theyre real deal plaeyers.. I just like to see these young guys develop under this staff,,,and do we add anyone to this list?(this year)if so, who you want ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#7
aka Flash Gordon, earthling
Planet Earth, when not battling Ming the Merciless
2018 F Darius Bazley out of Cincinnati reports via Twitter that he has received an offer from the Illini. Decommitted from tOSU in April.

 

Attachments

#9
Question: If Tyler Underwood was a walk-on at Oklahoma State, and now he will be enrolling at the University of Illinois and walking onto the basketball team, why does he have to sit out a red-shirt season? Doesn't seem fair---after all he is a walk-on and not using a scholarship. Please explain.
 
#10
aka Flash Gordon, earthling
Planet Earth, when not battling Ming the Merciless
Question: If Tyler Underwood was a walk-on at Oklahoma State, and now he will be enrolling at the University of Illinois and walking onto the basketball team, why does he have to sit out a red-shirt season? Doesn't seem fair---after all he is a walk-on and not using a scholarship. Please explain.
I'm sure there are others better able to answer this question than I, but here goes . . .

In the world of the NCAA, scholarship status is irrelevant to the transfer rules. Tyler Underwood was a basketball player last year at a Division 1 school. This year he is a Division 1 basketball player at a different school. Therefore, he sits out a year before becoming eligible to play again. In fact, he is on his third different team in three years, having been on the Stephen F. Austin basketball team two years ago. He sat out that year because of a medical issue, which means he won't be able to complete four years of eligibility because it would take him six years to do so, and the limit is five.

As far as "fair" is concerned, what is fair is in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. It is best to not use that word when considering NCAA rules.
 
#11
I'm sure there are others better able to answer this question than I, but here goes . . .

In the world of the NCAA, scholarship status is irrelevant to the transfer rules. Tyler Underwood was a basketball player last year at a Division 1 school. This year he is a Division 1 basketball player at a different school. Therefore, he sits out a year before becoming eligible to play again. In fact, he is on his third different team in three years, having been on the Stephen F. Austin basketball team two years ago. He sat out that year because of a medical issue, which means he won't be able to complete four years of eligibility because it would take him six years to do so, and the limit is five.

As far as "fair" is concerned, what is fair is in the eye of the beholder, so to speak. It is best to not use that word when considering NCAA rules.
rbachhuber, thanks for tackling my question.
I understand your point about "fair" and "NCAA rules" not mixing very well, but consider this: Let's say that Tyler Underwood is not the son of the head coach (and thus not receiving any employee tuition breaks) and, also, let's say Tyler's family was paying full tuition (*don't laugh--those people exist--I, myself, was a full tuition-paying parent). In THAT case, it would not be a matter of fairness, but a matter of commercial legality. How do you deny a FULL PAYING CUSTOMER access to a program offered by the University?? That is just plain wrong.
 
#12
There are plenty of people who will readily offer that what the NCAA does may not always be "right" in your sense of the word.
 
#13
rbachhuber, thanks for tackling my question.
I understand your point about "fair" and "NCAA rules" not mixing very well, but consider this: Let's say that Tyler Underwood is not the son of the head coach (and thus not receiving any employee tuition breaks) and, also, let's say Tyler's family was paying full tuition (*don't laugh--those people exist--I, myself, was a full tuition-paying parent). In THAT case, it would not be a matter of fairness, but a matter of commercial legality. How do you deny a FULL PAYING CUSTOMER access to a program offered by the University?? That is just plain wrong.
You have a very valid point, in all fairness walk-ons who pay full tuition should not be penalized for a transfer.
 
#14
Banned
Washington, DC
Why should how much tuition you pay determine which rules apply to you? Many sports offer less than full tuition rides.
 
#15
Peoria via Denver via Ann Arbor via Albuquerque vi
Why should how much tuition you pay determine which rules apply to you? Many sports offer less than full tuition rides.
Well, if you are paying full tuition, then you are not on a "ride" at all. You don't have to be XX" tall to walk around the theme park, just to take the coaster. [emoji4]
 
#16
Banned
Washington, DC
But by your analogy, the school is the theme park and the sport is the coaster. You've gotta abide by the rules of the sport, not by the schools rules.
 
#19
However, I guess if the rule was structured to allow full tuition walk-ons to transfer without penalty, then there would be the potential for abuse to those who wanted to change schools and could afford to just pay the tuition and be classified as a walk-on.
 
#20
aka Flash Gordon, earthling
Planet Earth, when not battling Ming the Merciless
In the four sports where sitting is mandatory within the Division the reason is the fear that that competitive pressure will lead to schools attempting to poach players. There is also concern that players will shift on a whim in those higher profile sports so sitting makes it a considered decision.
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-NCAA-athletes-have-to-sit-out-a-year-after-transferring

Why can’t a student-athlete compete immediately after transferring?

Requiring student-athletes to sit out of competition for a year after transferring encourages them to make decisions motivated by academics as well as athletics. Most student-athletes who are not eligible to compete immediately benefit from a year to adjust to their new school and focus on their classes. Student-athletes who must sit out for a year at their new school may or may not receive financial aid and practice with their new team.
http://www.ncaa.org/about/frequently-asked-questions-about-ncaa
 
#21
aka Flash Gordon, earthling
Planet Earth, when not battling Ming the Merciless
Adding another big to the grid . . . 6'10" PF Matic Vesel has committed to the Illini. He will report to the team in August.

He is from Slovenia, a European country that borders Austria, Italy, Croatia, and Hungary. Also has a coastline on the Adriatic Sea.

 

Attachments

Status
Not open for further replies.