Henry 22.0 mins, 6.1 pts, 49.5 fg%,3.8R, 1.6 A, .6 S, 1.3 TO
Tevian 9.2 mins,3.5 pts, 40.8 fg%, 1.4 R, .2 A, .5 S, .2 TO
Ahead but not by my measure of light years. Expect big improvement from both but larger from Tevian because of such limited minutes. I am actually expecting Alan to start over Tevian because of his defense which obviously isn't measured here and I believe Henry was a good defensive player.
If we just take Tevian's minutes and multiply them by 2.5 and then assume that he's improved enough to maintain his efficiency from last year to also multiply the remaining stats by 2.5:
Tevian: 23.0 mins, 8.8 pts, 40.8 fg%, 3.5 R, 0.5 A, 1.3 S, 0.5 TO
Then Henry probably improves also. If we increases his minutes by 20% while also maintaining his other stats he'd have something like:
Henry: 26.4 mins, 7.3 pts, 49.5 fg%, 4.6 R, 1.9 A, 0.7 S, 1.6 TO
But let's say he increases his other stats by another 20% while maintaining his Turnovers despite the increased minutes:
Henry: 26.4 mins, 8.8 pts, 49.5 fg%, 5.5 R, 2.3 A, 0.9 S, 1.3 TO
I think those are fair expectations to have for both of these players. If you compare the projected stat lines based on those expectations there is not that big of a difference between the 2:
Tevian: 23.0 mins, 8.8 pts, 40.8 fg%, 3.5 R, 0.5 A, 1.3 S, 0.5 TO
Henry: 26.4 mins, 8.8 pts, 49.5 fg%, 5.5 R, 2.3 A, 0.9 S, 1.3 TO