I started a thread on how the class stacked up against the rest of the conference. Lovie's median recruit ranking is only 0.8390, so you can't assume if the class was larger, he would have filled it with highly rated recruits at or above the 0.8630 average. And the 2019 class had exactly 7 above and 7 below his 0.8390 median. Wearing orange colored glasses and giving higher weight to Beason and Williams than 247 or I did (which is what your averaging does), I could see a case for ranking the class 10th in the league. No matter the ranking, 8th, 10th or 13th, I'm not seeing how that class, and the two current recruits, can be considered the "foundation for greatness."I don't know how many times we have to go over this - it was rated 13th in the Big Ten and 59th in the country because of the limited number of incoming kids. If you look at the average ranking, it was good enough for 8th in the Big Ten and somewhere around 30th in the country.
Likes: pvaughn8 and thunderwear