Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread (August 2019)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#676      

I just got a new pair. They wear out pretty fast. :)

orange tinted glasses.jpg
 
#678      

IllFanInMi

I
Guest
I don't know what to think, I feel like my brain has been put in a blender with this conversation.
Man I hope we get a recruit everyone can get excited about and move on

One thing I’m sure 99.9 would agree on is this year will be the most critical for the immediate future of BU and the direction of the program.

If the wins come and the product on the floor shows it has been elevated, the buzz will be BU has turned the program around. The media, coaches, recruits, and fans will take notice, and Illinois will be sexy again.

I have been frustrated with being right there on some big recruits, but not landing them, simply because it likely would have sped up the rebuild. Other coaches have come into programs and recruited great. Saying that, for where the program has been for the last 10 years compared to where it was, BU has done “okay” recruiting overall in my opinion.

Year 3 (barring crazy injury bug) must end in either an NCAA, or NIT game, and include at least one big signing. If not, I’m thinking there will be a lot of discussion in the coaching carousel thread.
 
#681      
One thing I’m sure 99.9 would agree on is this year will be the most critical for the immediate future of BU and the direction of the program.

If the wins come and the product on the floor shows it has been elevated, the buzz will be BU has turned the program around. The media, coaches, recruits, and fans will take notice, and Illinois will be sexy again.

I have been frustrated with being right there on some big recruits, but not landing them, simply because it likely would have sped up the rebuild. Other coaches have come into programs and recruited great. Saying that, for where the program has been for the last 10 years compared to where it was, BU has done “okay” recruiting overall in my opinion.

Year 3 (barring crazy injury bug) must end in either an NCAA, or NIT game, and include at least one big signing. If not, I’m thinking there will be a lot of discussion in the coaching carousel thread.

Good post and totally fair. It’s a pivotal year and I really think the rubber meets the road. We will see what direction this thing is going for sure.

Sadly, there has been so little to celebrate in revenue sports in the last several years it’s difficult to hold out a ton of hope. Illinois has long felt like an example of Murphy’s Law for far too long. Hope it takes a positive turn for a change.
 
#683      

WiscIllini

Madison, WI
You guys don't like Monte cause he doesn't score.....he doesn't need to score he impacts the game in so many other ways, BU trust Monte probably more than anyone else on the team.

He’s still got to be a threat to score, though. Otherwise opposing defenses can plan around it a la Jaylon Tate.
 
#684      

haasi

New York
Yup, Damonte just has to be able to hit open 3s at 35% plus to prevent defenses from ignoring him- not a tall order and he doesn’t need to do much else in terms of scoring. Becoming a decent open 3 point shooter requires practice and lots of repetition. He improved last year from 23% to 32%. That’s getting in the ballpark but he still only shot 41 three pointers all year and routinely passed up open looks. Can’t happen. Never needs to take a contested 3 but needs to consistently take 3s when no one is guarding him and be a reasonable threat.

Other than that, I agree- he plays D, he rebounds, he’s smart- he’s a utility asset.
 
#685      
You guys don't like Monte cause he doesn't score.....he doesn't need to score he impacts the game in so many other ways, BU trust Monte probably more than anyone else on the team.

Would BU prefer this Monte or the current Monte + s prolific scorer (who I think he could be or one I expected)
 
#686      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
We don't need DMW to hit threes, we need him to use that body to split defenses up and either get to the rim, or open up our actual 3pt shooters. All DMW needs to do is clean up his layup and short range game and he's gonna avg. 7-8ppg which will be perfect for his role. If he starts hitting 40% from 3pt.....maybe we'll start to see the pre knee injury DMW every night!
He has the ability and the talent, he just needs the confidence back to get some consistency.
 
#689      
He’s still got to be a threat to score, though. Otherwise opposing defenses can plan around it a la Jaylon Tate.
Big difference, If you don't guard Kofi, he'll dunk it. If they didn't guard Jaylon he'd miss the jump shot. Defenses would simply shag in and dare Jaylon to shoot. And fortunately most of the time he didn't shoot it. Unfortunately, sometimes he would try and make the play.

No offense to Jaylon seemed like a good kid, who worked hard, just was in water that was too deep. for his skills.

But this is probably getting away from pure recruiting, as much of the other preceding discussion is.

Anybody got any news related to recruiting?
 
#690      
I say check the records. If the recruiting is that good, there must be a coaching issue or we wouldn’t be finishing at the bottom of the league.

I’m all for the kool-aid but I need a little substance to base it on. Win some games this year, finish top half of the league, make the tourney. Get some top 100 (top 50 would be even better) guys in the 2020 class. More than one. Then I’ll start to buy it.

I disagree with that. We have rebuilt and the rotation was basically freshmen and sophomores last year, plus the final piece to bring us balance on the floor is Kofi. Now we're ready to compete at a high level and we will do just that. Last year was the first time a freshman ever lead Illinois in scoring and another freshman was 3rd in scoring, while a sophomore was 2nd. Young, young and young. Now we have experience and beef inside to compete .
 
#692      

WiscIllini

Madison, WI
Big difference, If you don't guard Kofi, he'll dunk it. If they didn't guard Jaylon he'd miss the jump shot. Defenses would simply shag in and dare Jaylon to shoot. And fortunately most of the time he didn't shoot it. Unfortunately, sometimes he would try and make the play.

No offense to Jaylon seemed like a good kid (who made one mistake), who worked hard, just was in water that was too deep. for his skills.

But this is probably getting away from pure recruiting, as much of the other preceding discussion is.

Anybody got any news related to recruiting?

What are you talking about? Last I checked Da'Monte doesn't play down low, he's a guard/wing player. Didn't say a single thing about Kofi.
 
#693      
You guys don't like Monte cause he doesn't score.....he doesn't need to score he impacts the game in so many other ways, BU trust Monte probably more than anyone else on the team.

https://www.news-gazette.com/sports...cle_617fb0e4-4090-5f41-a361-248ee3ea88ff.html

From that article:

Still, Underwood would like to see Williams be more aggressive offensively.

“We need to get him to the foul line 6-8 times a game,” he said. “He’s improved in that area a bunch.”

So, it would be better if Monte scores more. At least 6-8 points more.

Just saying.
 
#694      

WiscIllini

Madison, WI
Sergio wasn'y a big threat to score, but he did all the little things, like Da'Monte, that get you wins. Tate couldn't take it to the rack like Da'Monte can, so it's a d ifferent situation.

I looked up some stats for their freshmen and sophomore years in free throw attempts, which is a decent indicator of willingness to put up a shot/take it to the rim.

Player 1: Freshman [19/29]; Sophomore [59/70]

Player 2: Freshman [31/44]; Sophomore [45/50]

The cumulative between those two years is about the same, but don't think Jaylon wasn't willing at the same point in his career. His free throws and usage definitely dropped as he became a Jr/Sr, but one could argue his inability to shoot and score limited his effectiveness to drive. Jaylon was Player 1, by the way.
 
#695      
What are you talking about? Last I checked Da'Monte doesn't play down low, he's a guard/wing player. Didn't say a single thing about Kofi.
My Bad, had be reading earlier posts about how bad and uncertain everything was with this new line up, much of it was focused on the expectation of no offense from Kofi. All while working. Need to get to important things and focus on the board, not work..

Your point obviously makes more sense, but I don't think other teams can just leave DeMonte completely alone as the did with Jaylon, and literally play 5 on 4. Hopefully, his confidence is back with the knee and will show it.
 
#696      

sacraig

The desert
You guys don't like Monte cause he doesn't score.....he doesn't need to score he impacts the game in so many other ways, BU trust Monte probably more than anyone else on the team.

I mostly get where you are coming from, but at some point it starts to look like a Chester Frazier situation where he was trusted by Bruce to the moon and back, he was a floor general, a lock down defender, but any time we were on offense, we were playing 4 on 5.

To be clear, I don't think Da'Monte is at that point right now. He doesn't need to be a 20 point guy or even a 10 point guy, but he does need to be a credible threat to score when given an open look. I think we can all agree there.
 
#697      
I mostly get where you are coming from, but at some point it starts to look like a Chester Frazier situation where he was trusted by Bruce to the moon and back, he was a floor general, a lock down defender, but any time we were on offense, we were playing 4 on 5.

To be clear, I don't think Da'Monte is at that point right now. He doesn't need to be a 20 point guy or even a 10 point guy, but he does need to be a credible threat to score when given an open look. I think we can all agree there.
I completely agree with your points. Damonte needs to score more and those should be the expectations. That is a big departure, however, from where the conversation started which is that Williams was listed with several players that did not belong on a D1 roster. If Damonte can continue to be reliable on defense I would be happy with a modest 3-4 ppg bump in scoring.
 
#698      
Well regardless of whether we are getting the ones we want or not....the cost is there to get in the ears of recruits, international recruiting and possibly going to some smaller regional areas may be costing as well?

https://arizonasports.com/story/205...-in-football-basketball-recruiting-last-year/
of note:
Every school in the study spent more to recruit football than basketball, with the exception of Indiana. During 2018, the Hoosiers spent $739,722 for men’s basketball and $692,972 for football.

Indiana’s basketball spending was the most in the country, followed by Illinois ($703,536) and Kentucky ($645,160).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.