Transfers Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#176      
Jon Rothstein@JonRothstein 44m

Rider grad transfer Fred Scott tells me he has cut his list to the following programs:

Illinois
Illinois State
San Francisco
San Diego
Arkansas
Boston College

Immediately eligible.

Averaged 12.6 pts. and 5.2 rebs., shooting .468 FG% and .400 from 3 on 100 attempts. Only .602 on FTs. He's 6'8", 230 lbs. Interesting...
 
#182      

kiwanegarris22

South Carolina
I'm really NOT liking the new transfer rules. Much prefer seeing how coaches can develop players over a 3-4 year period.

With that said, it seems we've reached out to 20-30 eligible transfers of varying skills. Does anyone on here know which 5-6 might be our top (preferred) targets? I'd love to see that list, in priority order.
 
#184      
Illinois is a courtesy name on the list, Scott went to Simeon.
Yeah I looked at the list & was surprised Illinois was on it. I dont remember him doing much at Simeon. Hope he lands on his feet somewhere.
 
#185      
Everyone should listen to the BU interview on March 31st. He clearly states he is not a grad transfer fan but clearly likes "sits". Also said it is not necessary to have 13 scholarship players on a team. An interesting point he made was that Baylor's top 5 guys last year were all transfers. Plus he said it is hard this year to check out grad transfers. I doubt we'll take one.
 
#186      
Yeah I looked at the list & was surprised Illinois was on it. I dont remember him doing much at Simeon. Hope he lands on his feet somewhere.

Was at Simeon for 2014-2015 season, originally was at Oak Hill Academy. From Munster, IN.
 
#187      
Everyone should listen to the BU interview on March 31st. He clearly states he is not a grad transfer fan but clearly likes "sits". Also said it is not necessary to have 13 scholarship players on a team. An interesting point he made was that Baylor's top 5 guys last year were all transfers. Plus he said it is hard this year to check out grad transfers. I doubt we'll take one.

We'll take one only if it fitts.
 
#188      

ILFaninFL

Nature Coast in Florida
The names are starting to pile up. If Christmas came early, who would we want?
 
#189      
I'm really NOT liking the new transfer rules. Much prefer seeing how coaches can develop players over a 3-4 year period.

With that said, it seems we've reached out to 20-30 eligible transfers of varying skills. Does anyone on here know which 5-6 might be our top (preferred) targets? I'd love to see that list, in priority order.
From my perspective as a fan I totally agree with you. I still think it’s in the players best interest to have the increased freedom, and for that reason I support the open transfer rules. It’s just a bit sad to think it’s unlikely we’ll see another another warren carter, etc.
 
#194      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
I would take the #1 JC player in the nation every year, sight unseen.



Just for fun, the #1 ranked JuCo each year by 247


2013: Chris Thomas (Manhattan)
2014: Cinmeon Bowers (Auburn)
2015: TJ Dunans (Auburn)
2016: Jaylen Barford (Arkansas)
2017: Shakur Juiston (UNLV, then Oregon)
2018: Jordan Brangers (professional)
2019: Chris Duarte (Oregon)


All of these guys were at least solid contributors (exception maybe for Thomas, who was dismissed from the team), with a couple being #1 options (Barford, maybe Juiston).
 
#195      
Wonder if the staff will contact Taylor Mattos by chance? Bowling Green, fairly mobile, big who can play in and out?
 
#196      
From my perspective as a fan I totally agree with you. I still think it’s in the players best interest to have the increased freedom, and for that reason I support the open transfer rules. It’s just a bit sad to think it’s unlikely we’ll see another another warren carter, etc.
What does Warren Carter have to do with this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.