Game Thread: Illinois vs Michigan State

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2      
Any word on Lunt? Sorry if I missed that news. There's been some commotion in Chicago about a baseball team...

Who would have thought this would be a battle of 2-6 teams, and we'd have the only B1G win!?
 
#9      
We are so physically weak. We have guys getting pushed back 3 yards.
 
#12      
Maybe the defense can get a score or two today. I don't see the Illini moving the ball much on MSU.
 
#14      
Just scrap all passes and go to a triple I. We have 3 good backs, just go with that. We cannot throw the ball at all.
 
#15      
Defense looking good but it sure looks like MSU is this close at breaking a big gainer.
 
#16      
I can't believe we are only down a field goal at this point. Shows our D is playing better. If JGJ can pass to anybody he can find open it will open up the run game for us and at least we might have a chance...
 
#17      
Thank goodness MSU Aren't that good themselves. They are literally giving us a chance in this game.
 
#18      
Is there anybody in the stands? Don't hear a thing from them. Not that there is anything to cheer about yet. Seems like the network microphones are not pointing at the crowd.
 
#19      
The best part of this game is easily the infomercials. Not much to see here today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#20      
Looking like a game where who ever blinks first loses.
 
#21      
The best part of this game is easily the infomercials. Not much to see here today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They are good, but they don't compare to the height of the infomercials from from 2006-2008. Those were classics.
 
#25      
There's entertaining bad and boring bad and we're the latter. They've tripled us up on TOP, we have 26 yards and zero first downs. A yeoman job by the D holding them to 6 points so far but zero turnovers and they're allowing 5 of 9 on 3rd down. 28-14 at the half wouldn't be better football but it would be a lot easier to watch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back