Transfers Thread

#154      
Makes sense. Just wonder if the prospect of 35 mins a game could cause him to at least take a glance before he moves on.

You never know how a player thinks, but when he averages 34 mpg at Stanford and decides to leave, I think he is looking for something other than just mins per game with this move.
 
#155      
You never know how a player thinks, but when he averages 34 mpg at Stanford and decides to leave, I think he is looking for something other than just mins per game with this move.

Well established starters who leave Power Five schools as grad transfers are looking for the big time spotlight more often than not. Doing it with a Stanford degree in hand is a pretty sweet play, good for him.
 
#156      
You never know how a player thinks, but when he averages 34 mpg at Stanford and decides to leave, I think he is looking for something other than just mins per game with this move.

Wow. Didn’t realize he already had that much PT. Go compete for championship young man
 
#168      

Deleted member 186590

D
Guest
If he had a torn ACL in March, he won't be able to play this year and thus is of no real use to us.

Isn't the typical timeframe for ACL return more like 6-8 months now? He would certainly be able to come back at some point during the season and he's 7 foot and can rebound. I would say, there is literally no downside to taking him. He'll be 24 in Oct and has already transferred twice, so I don't think he would be looking to take a medical redshirt and sit out another year.
 
#175      
Not true at all. ACL recovery times are trending towards longer return to play, but 6-9 months is still very common at this point.

Wasn't DaMonte hurt in Nov and wasn't cleared until Sept? 10 mos? Differences in the ACL injury or surgery?