Everything is fine, good night.
Everything is fine, good night.
But ... that's Schroeder, not Schrodinger. We can't even get PEANUTS rumors correct on this forum! There's just no hope.This Schrodinger? j/k
That’s where I’m at. I’m still going to follow along but I won’t be quite as emotionally invested. That’s probably a plus for my health. LolI think the answer is likely multi-year contracts. There is a reason the NBA(and all pro teams) don't typically sign people to one year deals, especially young developing players with believed potential. You don't want to put the work in just to see them go elsewhere. It wastes your time as an organization, it wastes your money, and it hurts the overall product for the consumer(i.e the fans). If fans can no longer root for particular players with any belief that they will be back then they will not be as attached to the teams. Less fanatic fans buy less product. (Who wants to buy some slightly used Clark and Epps jerseys? I'm sure they are easy to find.)Organizations make less money and players NIL starts diminishing. Everyone loses outside of a very few programs that will have donors continue to toss their money away. But the real money is in tv deals...and when the product loses interest with those it once drew in those deals will also go down.
The NCAA by turning itself into an academic G-League might wind up with the same viewership down the road...without the NBA subsidizing them. The problem is these impacts won't happen for a few more years when it might be too late.
But we are just a couple years in to this and I'm already starting to care less. That's not a great sign for the common fan as Illinois Basketball has been (sadly) important to me over several decades.
They have been hearing how great they are since the toddler stage so I'm of the belief this trend will continue until some restraint's are implemented.........what those restraint's could be is beyond my old stinky fart cognitive thought process...It really really is....As a fellow cynically rotten fart, I'd also point out that the general "grass isn't always greener" lesson is likely to be especially difficult for P5-level athletes - many of whom believe that they will buck the odds and make it to the NBA because in their minds, they're different than all of the many others who came before them but did not make it for whatever reason.
The same "yeah, but I'm me" cognitive bias will likely continue to fuel potentially unrealistic expectations about new levels of success following a change of scenery.
The reason why the NBA and other pro leagues (aside from the NFL, maybe) don't sign young players to one-year contracts is because they have collective bargaining agreements in place with the players' unions that, along with the draft, allow them to lock in young players for well below market value for several years.I think the answer is likely multi-year contracts. There is a reason the NBA(and all pro teams) don't typically sign people to one year deals, especially young developing players with believed potential. You don't want to put the work in just to see them go elsewhere. It wastes your time as an organization, it wastes your money, and it hurts the overall product for the consumer(i.e the fans).
Regardless of ones views on The Chief, it's pretty universally known that the chief logo might have been, and still is, the coolest in all of sports.Fanatics carries a number of items with the Chief logo. It's all that I will buy at this point.
Your farts have cognitive thought processes? You become infinitely more fascinating with each passing week.They have been hearing how great they are since the toddler stage so I'm of the belief this trend will continue until some restraint's are implemented.........what those restraint's could be is beyond my old stinky fart cognitive thought process...It really really is....
Schrodinger's basketball player....
Chances he saw what Podz did and wants to do something similar? Probably highI personally would not blame RJ one bit for transferring if we were actively recruiting someone who might take his playing time. I would argue he's proven his abilities, and he was only a sophomore last year; he needs the opportunity to be a starter and get into a real groove and make the jump to a consistently great player. Additionally, we are not really lacking at his specific skillset ... we need a sharp-shooting 3-point specialist, a true PG and a big. I'd be disappointed if RJ had any reason to feel like we were "recruiting over him" (arguably for the second straight year). You can argue all you want about how competition is good, but it should not be easy to see why that would get to the kid, especially after his confidence issues in the middle of this season.
I hope he stays almost as much as CoHawk and TSJ!
CJ Schrodinger has remaining eligibility?This Schrodinger? j/k
Schrod
How much of his struggles this year were due to his shoulder injury? I fully expect him to shoot 40% from 3 somewhere else next year. Oh well, next man up.
I was just saying this to a friend of mine. I think that will have a fairly large impact. Just too many players in the “system.” Combine that with NIL and you have the perfect storm.I think the extra COVID year has just added to the transfer portal craziness because there are now more college basketball players with extra eligibility than ever before.
Players who are in Coleman Hawkins' class were freshman when the extra year was awarded, so there are two years left of extra COVID year eligible athletes. After that it will hopefully slow down a little, including for reasons like you mentioned about the grass not always being greener.
It is absolutely my perception, as well. However, I remember seeing it laid out in "stats form" one time, and the conclusion was that Bo Ryan actually recruited QUITE well. Either way, he recruited TO his system, and he surrounded the highly ranked individuals with support pieces that fit perfectly.One of the reasons I have loved college basketball has been being able to watch freshman come in to the Illini and mature and improve each year. Living in Wisconsin, most of my buddies are Badger fans, so I probably watch and follow them second to the Illini. I am not a stats guy nor I claim any great knowledge but it seems like to me that, over the years Wisconsin, has done a very good job taking kids who come in as "not stars" and developing them into some pretty excellent upper classmen. Again - before you attack me with precise stats, etc - that is just my perception as a viewer.
I know, but I was getting itchy to giffy because it's fun to make people complain about the gifs.But ... that's Schroeder, not Schrodinger. We can't even get PEANUTS rumors correct on this forum! There's just no hope.
If it's #1, then this is #1ARegardless of ones views on The Chief, it's pretty universally known that the chief logo might have been, and still is, the coolest in all of sports.
Your farts have cognitive thought processes? You become infinitely more fascinating with each passing week.
<passing> see what I did there?
I know, but I was getting itchy to giffy because it's fun to make people complain about the gifs.