Yeah Underwood has had 2 bad seasons in the last 3 years. Not good
How quickly the definition of bad season changes.
Yeah Underwood has had 2 bad seasons in the last 3 years. Not good
This tends to happen when the team has a plethora of resources that other programs would kill for, and you have a top 10 paid head coach. The expectations have risen considerably, as they should. It ultimately comes down to what the big donors define as a bad season. I would assume they would classify two of the last 3 seasons in that bucket.How quickly the definition of bad season changes.
We lost in the regional final/Elite 8. We defeated Iowa State in the regional semifinal/Sweet 16.BU’s tournament record leaves a lot to be desired. There’s no doubt he can deliver regular-season wins, which was something we desperately needed. However, to take the team to the next level in the tournament, we may need to look for a different coach.
2014: Lost Second Round
2015: Lost First Round
2016: Lost Second Round
2017: Lost First Round
2018: Missed Tournament
2019: Missed Tournament
2020: Covid
2021: Lost second Round as a one seed
2022: Lost Second Round
2023: Lost First Round
2024: Lost Sweet 16 to eventual NC
None of that matters. All that says is Illinois had a terrible athletic director before Whitman. This is Whitman's department now. Times have changed.And even with that loss (that I’m upset about too, we all are), this is still the second best team in the 12 years before Brad.
Similar in some respects....with talent they could both consistently win during the regular season, but struggled in the postseason and are clearly a step below the elite level.I would compare Brad to Lou. He took a dead in the water program and completely turned it around.
This tends to happen when the team has a plethora of resources that other programs would kill for, and you have a top 10 paid head coach. The expectations have risen considerably, as they should. It ultimately comes down to what the big donors define as a bad season. I would assume they would classify two of the last 3 seasons in that bucket.
It is good to say that two of the last 3 seasons are "bad seasons". It means that the program is back to relevancy.
As it should. Putting it way too simply, Josh's job is to do a risk assessment. He could choose to try to upgrade while the stock is still fairly high or wait until there's more signs of a decline. Either one has a risk. I'm still in favor of holding on to Brad since I think he has enough common sense and support around him to make the necessary changes. I won't be devastated if he moves on though.How quickly the definition of bad season changes.
However, we are on a tipping point in the program.This tends to happen when the team has a plethora of resources that other programs would kill for, and you have a top 10 paid head coach. The expectations have risen considerably, as they should. It ultimately comes down to what the big donors define as a bad season. I would assume they would classify two of the last 3 seasons in that bucket.
It is good to say that two of the last 3 seasons are "bad seasons". It means that the program is back to relevancy.
If you consider getting a 7 seed in the tournament a "bad" season, I suppose. Oh how our standards have changed.Yeah Underwood has had 2 bad seasons in the last 3 years. Not good
Agree wholeheartedly on our draw last year being both lucky (easy path to S16) and unlucky (in historically dominant UConn’s bracket).I’d ignore any statistician that attempted to make that kind of argument with four data points.
Last years sweet 16 path was lucky. If we hadn’t beat a good Iowa St team, I’m feeling completely different today. If we don’t land in UCONN (and maybe Purdue) region, I think there’s a real chance we’re coming off a final four and everybody’s way more understanding about the difficulties of reloading.
If Brad’s proven anything over the years it’s he’s adaptable. He may not right the ship and “save” the season by making a sweet 16, but he’s still a darn good coach and there’s a reason other teams have been reaching out to his agent.
Big donors might force a change. Doesn’t make them right or rational.This tends to happen when the team has a plethora of resources that other programs would kill for, and you have a top 10 paid head coach. The expectations have risen considerably, as they should. It ultimately comes down to what the big donors define as a bad season. I would assume they would classify two of the last 3 seasons in that bucket.
It is good to say that two of the last 3 seasons are "bad seasons". It means that the program is back to relevancy.
If you watched that season and said yeah we had a good season then wow. At the end of that season it was becoming a joke and a train wreck if you think back.If you consider getting a 7 seed in the tournament a "bad" season, I suppose. Oh how our standards have changed.
I would think that Brad would be there main target cuz if I remember correctly they have had serious interest in him before.If K-state were to let go of Tang, wouldn't imagine they'd have too many guys ahead of Brad.
A bad season at Illinois can reasonably and objectively be defined as getting an NCAA tournament seed worse than #7.How quickly the definition of bad season changes.
If KJ, Kofi, TSJ, Tomi, Will, and Ayo are generational talents, I fear for the next 60 years when we will have used up 6 of our "generational" talents. Wow, I am SHOCKED at the hyperbole on Loyalty this week. I erroneously thought a generation lasted longer than 2-3 years. Color me embarrassed.KJ is like to be a first round one and done. I think that qualifies as generational in the same sense as multi-year Ayo, Kofi, and TSJ for us at this point. You could make the case for Ivisic and Riley as well.
Talent isn't the issue, aside from a few players who really haven't been good this year. Usage and game plan are the issues. Coaching is the issue.
To be fair, "generational talent" has quickly become another one of those completely overused phrases to the point of being cliche.If KJ, Kofi, TSJ, Tomi, Will, and Ayo are generational talents, I fear for the next 60 years when we will have used up 6 of our "generational" talents. Wow, I am SHOCKED at the hyperbole on Loyalty this week. I erroneously thought a generation lasted longer than 2-3 years. Color me embarrassed.
If you need help to identify that talent level I recommend you check the raftersDefine generational. Seems like a lot of generational talent in a very short span there.
Is it possible we promoted Hamer and Tyler because Underwood is having trouble finding more qualified assistants that want to work for him? His history with assistant coaches hasn't been the best as evidenced by the Chester and TA situations. Is his reputation preceding him? NO gaslighting, just an honest question.
I am so glad we are in a state of our program where a bad season is 6+ Q1 wins and squarely in the tournament (as of now) or making it as a 9 seed with players leaving and lots of turmoil. We would have sold our soul for this 7 years ago, much less an E8 showing and a 1 seed.I totally relate to being haunted by the Loyola game, I too still think about it all the time and now that the Cubs have won it all and put the Bartman thing to bed that's probably the most painful loss of my entire life.
But you guys are letting that lead you into some deeply unsound thinking.
BU is his own worst enemy
If K-state were to let go of Tang, wouldn't imagine they'd have too many guys ahead of Brad.
We shouldn't get wrapped around the axle on the difference between "talent" and "impact player".If KJ, Kofi, TSJ, Tomi, Will, and Ayo are generational talents, I fear for the next 60 years when we will have used up 6 of our "generational" talents. Wow, I am SHOCKED at the hyperbole on Loyalty this week. I erroneously thought a generation lasted longer than 2-3 years. Color me embarrassed.