Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#126      
Clean slate. Let's try to go the entire day without numbering our posts, and adding '-ic' to everyone's last name on the team! We can do it!
I'm going to be real, if the Illini sign one more player with a last name ending in -ic, I am going to petition to add an -ic to the end of my username here.
 
#127      
Yup, I can see that too. Barea is considerably smaller though, isn't he like 5-9?

Yep just an old man game with a deep bag.
He’s going to be so good off screens and pnr
 
#133      
Generally, no, because they are intended to benefit private individuals ($ to players) rather than public interests.

They are not a charitable deduction but they could be a valid business expense if you can prove that your business got reasonable value for using the players Name Image and Likeness. Remember the Illini players last season posting that they were at Car dealer helping sell cars. I think IRS will look closely at these deals

I wonder if NIL deal would have to be direct between player and business (not thru NIL collective). Think Nike endorsement.
:)
 
#134      
Indy had mentioned Luka and I have watched him a bit. I think he looks very good and Indy had given a "Shhhh!" Gif about him. I if we add another player it is this guy! I really like his game and release on his jump shot.

 
Last edited:
#139      
They will be deemed eligible....just a matter of what their classification will be.(Soph or Junior)
Is the framework under which the NCAA is analyzing those things public knowledge?

Tomi is the first player I've ever heard of being "ruled" an older class upon entering college. The rules always used to be an analysis of whether a European pro team had paid a guy a "salary" beyond basic cost of living, with some fudge factor to have a kid "pay back" some amount to true it up. But it was very much under the theory that if you were a professional basketball player you were not college eligible, period.

I really like the idea of a class-based analysis that puts Europeans where they "belong" in terms of the time they've been playing paid basketball at a post-youth level, but I have not seen a single thing either 1. saying that's actually what they're doing or 2. describing how they are doing that analysis

(And of course it all begs the question of why American pros, especially ones that fail to make NBA rosters, can't come back to access NIL millions. What's the difference between the Adriatic League and the G League? There isn't one.)
 
#141      
They are not a charitable deduction but they could be a valid business expense if you can prove that your business got reasonable value for using the players Name Image and Likeness. Remember the Illini players last season posting that they were at Car dealer helping sell cars. I think IRS will look closely at these deals

I wonder if NIL deal would have to be direct between player and business (not thru NIL collective). Think Nike endorsement.
:)
Yes I think for the kinds of deals where the student athlete is appearing in ads or doing promotional events this is almost certainly being written off as a business expense (advertising).
 
#142      
Is the framework under which the NCAA is analyzing those things public knowledge?

Tomi is the first player I've ever heard of being "ruled" an older class upon entering college. The rules always used to be an analysis of whether a European pro team had paid a guy a "salary" beyond basic cost of living, with some fudge factor to have a kid "pay back" some amount to true it up. But it was very much under the theory that if you were a professional basketball player you were not college eligible, period.

I really like the idea of a class-based analysis that puts Europeans where they "belong" in terms of the time they've been playing paid basketball at a post-youth level, but I have not seen a single thing either 1. saying that's actually what they're doing or 2. describing how they are doing that analysis

(And of course it all begs the question of why American pros, especially ones that fail to make NBA rosters, can't come back to access NIL millions. What's the difference between the Adriatic League and the G League? There isn't one.)
Once that box is opened, where does it logically stop? The NCAA has been losing every fight in court when it comes to eligibility. It might be that we accept the decision now, but fight it later just so our guy will be ready for the season.

There is no official guidance that I've seen that 1 year of paid euro ball equals one year of service in the NCAA. For once we are pushing the envelope and successfully doing it, but when it's so grey, I have concerns that the NCAA decides to take a stand and we get caught in the crossfire. We have a lot of eggs in a lot of European baskets.
 
#143      
The Illini collective appeared to have players doing PR/charitable work like hosting clinics for elementary school kids etc. I don't think that is going to meet the fair value test for a $3M NIL player.
 
#144      
Could they get money of a big fish were to happen....probably but they'd have to do some begging.

Just to put things in perspective...
Riley 800k
KJ 800k.......Both first round picks....

Andrej 2-3 million.....
If a "big fish" was to become available, Illinois could "probably" get the money, but it would take some "begging" by Brad. Who would you consider a possible "big fish" in that scenario? Jamir Watkins? Dame Sarr? Luka Bogavac? Someone else you can name?

What if a "small fish" was to become available? Does Illinois have enough money left to sign the smaller fish? What required dollar amount would make that potential signee a small fish? Could/Should Brad do just a bit of begging for some lesser amount of funds to sign a non-superstar?

In your opinion, how much would it cost to sign one of Elon Jr Guard TK Simpkins, UC San Diego Sr Guard Tyler McGhie, SIU Sr Guard Ali Dibba, and/or UT San Antonio Sr Guard Damari Monsanto? I can see valid (and different) reasons for the Illini to add one of these players, but I have no idea what the "asking price" would be for each. [I personally think that the Illini need one more SG to fill out their roster for 25-26. More so than a PG, a SF, a PF, or a Center.]

Last question: If you add up the dollars that Illinois "spent" to retain Tomi, Boswell, Rodgers, Humrichous, Davis, and Jakstys, PLUS the money paid to incoming freshmen Mirkovic, Lee, and Wagler, PLUS the money paid to transfers Big Z, Petrovic, and Stojakovic, what would that TOTAL dollar amount be? (Ballpark figure perhaps?) It would be interesting to me to know how much Illinois has spent for that 12-man roster. Thanks in advance for your best guess on that sum. And thanks for your opinions on Simpkins/McGhie/Dibba/Monsanto.
 
#146      
Michelangelo is the best TMNT.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1990S GIF
Tmnt GIF by Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
 
#147      
I think Wagler/Lee to go along Boswell and Petrovic (and perhaps Andrej) is a sufficient backcourt. I would like another vet, as others have put it, in the Harmon role. Heck, give me a flier on another euro guy.
In regard to the Harmon role that you mention, I always thought that 6'4" Jr. Guard Jemel Jones (a Chicago native) of Cal State Bakersfield could've fit that role perfectly for the Illini. I understand that people on this site didn't like his funky form on his jumper, but the numbers were there! This past season, Jones averaged 18.9 points/3.6 rebounds, and 2.1 assists while shooting 47.8% on FGs, including 35.2% on 3-pointers, and 85.7% on FTs. But Jones has now transferred to New Mexico State. I would be interested in knowing how much money Jones received from NMU for his transfer there?
 
#149      
If a "big fish" was to become available, Illinois could "probably" get the money, but it would take some "begging" by Brad. Who would you consider a possible "big fish" in that scenario? Jamir Watkins? Dame Sarr? Luka Bogavac? Someone else you can name?

What if a "small fish" was to become available? Does Illinois have enough money left to sign the smaller fish? What required dollar amount would make that potential signee a small fish? Could/Should Brad do just a bit of begging for some lesser amount of funds to sign a non-superstar?

In your opinion, how much would it cost to sign one of Elon Jr Guard TK Simpkins, UC San Diego Sr Guard Tyler McGhie, SIU Sr Guard Ali Dibba, and/or UT San Antonio Sr Guard Damari Monsanto? I can see valid (and different) reasons for the Illini to add one of these players, but I have no idea what the "asking price" would be for each. [I personally think that the Illini need one more SG to fill out their roster for 25-26. More so than a PG, a SF, a PF, or a Center.]

Last question: If you add up the dollars that Illinois "spent" to retain Tomi, Boswell, Rodgers, Humrichous, Davis, and Jakstys, PLUS the money paid to incoming freshmen Mirkovic, Lee, and Wagler, PLUS the money paid to transfers Big Z, Petrovic, and Stojakovic, what would that TOTAL dollar amount be? (Ballpark figure perhaps?) It would be interesting to me to know how much Illinois has spent for that 12-man roster. Thanks in advance for your best guess on that sum. And thanks for your opinions on Simpkins/McGhie/Dibba/Monsanto.
1. We aren't in on any of the guys you mentioned. I think the only big fish would be Boogie just because of the previous relationship.
2. Gotta remember what might be a small fish to us could be a bigger fish to other programs. More money from them if they value him more.
3. No idea. I could see us offering someone like the guys you mentioned a couple hundred thousand. But is that enough?
4. Rough estimate for this year's roster 8 mil. Give or take a mil
 
#150      
Once that box is opened, where does it logically stop? The NCAA has been losing every fight in court when it comes to eligibility. It might be that we accept the decision now, but fight it later just so our guy will be ready for the season.

There is no official guidance that I've seen that 1 year of paid euro ball equals one year of service in the NCAA. For once we are pushing the envelope and successfully doing it, but when it's so grey, I have concerns that the NCAA decides to take a stand and we get caught in the crossfire. We have a lot of eggs in a lot of European baskets.
I've got concerns about the NCAA trying to draw a line here too.

In terms of losing in court, it has all been questions of eligibility that are arbitrary or inconsistently applied to particular players. I don't think antitrust law stands for the proposition that LeBron James must be allowed to play in the NCAA after his career is over.

I think if they said something like, you have to be academically eligible, enrolled as a full time student, between the ages of 17 and 24, and you only get 5 seasons to play, I don't see why that would have any legal troubles, those being clear and bona fide qualifications that apply equally to everybody.

That's quite radically different than the current rules though, with American pros coming back being the most obvious new talent source. How THAT gets prevented if European pros are allowed in I don't know. Could major college basketball fold in under the NBAPA in a similar fashion to how minor leagues are now part of the MLB union?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back