Missouri, SEC top tier team and Kansas should be an annual thing.Kansas?
Bingo. Drop, AND going over the screen takes away the 3 and protects the basket. The hole is in the middle which is why it’s an analytically sound coverage. Analytically, the 2 worst shots you can take in a pick and roll situation is the mid range pull-up and the floater.Absolutely, and the defensive struggles are way overstated by many
Illinois defended the 3 pretty well last year overall, opponents made on average only 6.7 threes per game vs Illinois (.336 percentage)
The way Illinois employs the drop coverage, we're not leaving guys open for 3s but rather mid-range shots... problem is some teams have guys who can make those... However, I felt we were sort of locked into that drop coverage due to personnel as you said (and we may very well be again this year)
But as so many have also pointed out, you can get to (and win) a F4 with only an 'above average' defense... its been an elite offense that seems to be required to win it all, rather than an elite defense
Also, some criticism is fine when warranted but people say things like hAmEr WeArS LeGgInGs HAHAHAHA and then later want to be taken seriously and I just can't
I think he's going to do just fine. Let's do this!
Agree but think the first round of Kansas games should be on campus. Do the other places afterwards kinda like TennesseeMissouri, SEC top tier team and Kansas should be an annual thing.
Missouri in St. Louis, Strong SEC Team a home/away thing and Kansas a Kemper Arena/United Center thing.
Everyone can recruit off campus now. Just not everyone at onceWill he be allowed to recruit off campus?
fightingillini.com
Yeah but...is he Athletic enough?
Agreed, I'd love to have an MSG game every couple of years as well, could be SEC, ACC, or any good team honestly..... Gonzaga, UAz, or similar.Missouri, SEC top tier team and Kansas should be an annual thing.
Missouri in St. Louis, Strong SEC Team a home/away thing and Kansas a Kemper Arena/United Center thing.
I’ve heard Crocker is like Steve Kerr, but a better tactician and player manager.Yeah but...is he Athletic enough?
I mean did you not understand Bears fans hatred of Shane Waldron? Or Mel Tucker years ago?I don't understand the anger directed towards Hamer. Underwood is the head coach, if he is okay with the way Hamer runs the defense, then the anger should be directed towards him. If he doesn't like the defense being played, he should make a change.
Serious question: Where does the NCAA come up with their rules? It really just seems like they make things up just to say they have rules.Everyone can recruit off campus now. Just not everyone at once
They didn’t change the number of recruits allowed on the road at once. They just made it so any of the 5 assistants can do it when they upped the number of on court assistants as school could have.Serious question: Where does the NCAA come up with their rules? It really just seems like they make things up just to say they have rules.
Bingo. Drop, AND going over the screen takes away the 3 and protects the basket. The hole is in the middle which is why it’s an analytically sound coverage. Analytically, the 2 worst shots you can take in a pick and roll situation is the mid range pull-up and the floater.
Drop also keeps the game 2 on 2 between the handler and the screener and their defenders. The other 3 guys can stay with their man and take away high percentage, catch and shoot, kickout 3s.
I do think sometimes we go over on non shooters, and I’m not a big fan of that.
Overall, you need a top 40 defense and top 10 offense. The question is if we have personnel to get a top 40 defense, regardless of scheme, CONSISTENTLY.
Agreed on pretty well all of your points here.
I don’t want to praise the defense too much because it’s till an area for improvement imo, but the scheme itself (and by extension the coaches implementing it) isn’t like this it is this sore thumb type of problem that JW/BU are just ignoring because they love Hamer so much and want to be able to take him on all their outings with the men’s golf team.
You can pick out some games where we pretty much failed defensively, but you also go through other successful teams’ schedules and find the same thing. We probably won’t see a perfect or near perfect season front-to-back again a la 2005. Too much parity in these power conferences for that now.
You can also go through our schedule and pick out some good defensive performances in games where you wouldn’t think you would be able to find those (ie, where the other team scored more than, say 80 points but the pace was extremely fast). For example if you felt like by watching the Purdue game that “well Purdue just wasn’t very good on offense” then the defense can also get some credit for that, it’s not like Braden is out here point shaving.
I think many of us have expressed our frustration with Brad for putting Hamer into a position for which he's clearly shown to be out of his depth.I don't understand the anger directed towards Hamer. Underwood is the head coach, if he is okay with the way Hamer runs the defense, then the anger should be directed towards him. If he doesn't like the defense being played, he should make a change.
Even just mixing up the coverage on possessions (not necessarily zone) should help throw teams off. Otherwise, the offense is going to eventually find the gaps in the DMy only real bones to pick with the defense is we don’t seem to have a counter for what we do. Last year we would drop, and if that didn’t work…we would drop. I think that is truly a personnel thing because we don’t have the guys to do much else.
Personally I’m a firm believer that you have to be able to zone every now and then if a team gets some rhythm on you. But I understand the reluctance if our defense goals are to keep teams 3s low and be an elite rebounding team. Zone doesn’t correlate well with that.
I don't know about it being way overstated. Stats don't always tell the story but the combo of eye-test and stats is not pretty.Absolutely, and the defensive struggles are way overstated by many
Illinois defended the 3 pretty well last year overall, opponents made on average only 6.7 threes per game vs Illinois (.336 percentage)
The way Illinois employs the drop coverage, we're not leaving guys open for 3s but rather mid-range shots... problem is some teams have guys who can make those... However, I felt we were sort of locked into that drop coverage due to personnel as you said (and we may very well be again this year)
But as so many have also pointed out, you can get to (and win) a F4 with only an 'above average' defense... its been an elite offense that seems to be required to win it all, rather than an elite defense
Also, some criticism is fine when warranted but people say things like hAmEr WeArS LeGgInGs HAHAHAHA and then later want to be taken seriously and I just can't
same with Humrichous.I don't understand the anger directed towards Hamer. Underwood is the head coach, if he is okay with the way Hamer runs the defense, then the anger should be directed towards him. If he doesn't like the defense being played, he should make a change.
I think this is a misread. I don't have any anger towards Hamer. I don't respect him because he's bad at coaching defense (and has personal traits that make him an easy target for keyboard warriors). The closest thing I have to anger is dismay at the hold he had over BU to continue to in his role and drive this past season's underperformance. To your point, that is a BU issue. I like the Crocker hire and am hopeful that he is given the chance to turn things around. But I was hopeful with Chester too and we see how that turned out.I don't understand the anger directed towards Hamer. Underwood is the head coach, if he is okay with the way Hamer runs the defense, then the anger should be directed towards him. If he doesn't like the defense being played, he should make a change.
I don't know about it being way overstated. Stats don't always tell the story but the combo of eye-test and stats is not pretty.
94th in Overall Defensive Efficiency
238th in Opponents Points Per Game (some of this is pace per play but that's still atrocious)
131st Opponents Field Goal %
This was a pretty bad defensive team. Obviously a big part of that was personnel, but the scheme and lack of adjustments exacerbated the weaknesses. I understand the drop coverage theory, but I'm not sure it can be effective enough to be an elite team at this level.