hawiian_mike
Unkle Mike
- Here, There, and Everywhere
Fairly confident there’s going to be a commitment today!Welcome to all the recruits on an OV. Hope to see you next year wearing Oand B.
Fairly confident there’s going to be a commitment today!Welcome to all the recruits on an OV. Hope to see you next year wearing Oand B.
Give me Hankins at No. 1. Instate should always be the main priority, and need another quality corner in the class. Getting and maintaining Singelton was never a realistic option and he was never truly "committed."My wish list of commitments this weekend:
1. Ashford
2. Hankins
3. Cabell
4. Wheeler
Or have they already …![]()
hope that's an unfiltered cig in your avatar
I wonder about flexibility of 85 roster target and 105 limit. If you have a larger prep class, develop over 2 years - if no playing time in future then transfer. Can justify more spots if team does well/ wins/ bowl playoff. ROI, then just continues to recycle.If Wheeler is already a done deal, then it tells me everything I need to know about Barnett. You can't really justify two prep RBs with all of the tip-top targets and it already being a big class.
For me, Hankins is the most important uncommitted visitor this weekend and it's not close.
There is no “85 roster target”. 85 was the old max number of scholarships. Roster was always well over that # with walk-ons included. Iirc, the count was +/-120 earlier this year.I wonder about flexibility of 85 roster target and 105 limit. If you have a larger prep class, develop over 2 years - if no playing time in future then transfer. Can justify more spots if team does well/ wins/ bowl playoff. ROI, then just continues to recycle.
My wish list of commitments this weekend:
1. Ashford
2. Hankins
3. Cabell
4. Wheeler
Shoot, Coach B doesn’t only walk on water, he swims through earth.I want all of them. Fors, Vala and Marks too. 7 for 7 would be epic
Normally, I'd scoff at this, but Coach B walks on water
I want all of them. Fors, Vala and Marks too. 7 for 7 would be epic
Normally, I'd scoff at this, but Coach B walks on water
Marks isn’t visitingI want all of them. Fors, Vala and Marks too. 7 for 7 would be epic
Normally, I'd scoff at this, but Coach B walks on water
the 105 roster limit is on hold right now - waiting on a decision from a judge re a lawsuitThere is no “85 roster target”. 85 was the old max number of scholarships. Roster was always well over that # with walk-ons included. Iirc, the count was +/-120 earlier this year.
Now, 105 is the roster limit and the scholarship limit. Only question is going to be how many more scholarships Illini are going to fund? Are they going to fund the full 105? Partial scholarships are now allowed for football. Doesn’t necessarily mean they’ll go that route (Walk-ons still allowed)
Recent articles mentioning how the journey to 105 roster limit might end up being phased in over next year or two.
I want all of them. Fors, Vala and Marks too. 7 for 7 would be epic
Normally, I'd scoff at this, but Coach B walks on water
he may indeed be a missile, but at that size he looks more like a safety to meanother missile: