But I don’t think that’s the crux of the issue.I don’t know. I like all the rule changes except the extra inning rule.
I can live with umps calling strikes.
Yes, it was a bad call. It happens once in a while.
But, I think it is cool that each ump is a little different and players have to adjust to the ump.
Nobody was better at adjusting to the ump than Greg Maddox. He knew the umpire’s tendencies and used that to a devedtating advantage.
If each ump has a particular strike zone but holds that strike zone perfectly all game long, that’s basically an automated strike zone.
Maybe adjust the SZ for a game to keep pitchers and batters on their toes if you still want variability. Hell, do it each inning if you like. (keeping it the same for the top and bottom)
But the real issue is what’s a strike in the bottom of an inning isn’t always a strike in the top or hasn’t been called a strike all game.
Inconsistency from the same ump gives in unintentional advantage to either team. (Throughout the game and for both teams most likely)
I bet the location of that called strikeout on PCA above was not a strike at some point, during some other at bat, in the same game. And THAT is where an automated strike zone could help.
All just my opinion of course.