Chicago Cubs 2025

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,851      
agree with basically all of this except the Shota has struggled since the IL, he has had a shaky outing or two but struggled is not really it. his era since coming off the IL is 3.24 with a .84 whip. not too shaby

Since I made my post, he had a very nice start, which brought his post-injury numbers in line with his pre-injury numbers.

He’s having a very nice year and I’m relatively confident any time he, Boyd or Horton take the mound. Honestly, Rea’s also been solid, in that he can reliably go 5 while keeping the game within reach.
 
#1,852      
we need a 7-1 game in the opener, and a 5-0 game at night.
In Both games we need to score 3-4 runs in the first three innings
 
#1,853      
Needed to get at least one in the fourth…then of course a guy with 6 HR hits one in the top of the 5th.
 
#1,854      
First, after three straight walks, I watch a guy get 7 straight pitches outside the zone, yet strike out. Then the next inning I watch multiple players take strike three fastballs right down the middle. This has gotten ridiculous. Two runs down and it feels like they have no chance.
 
#1,856      
First, after three straight walks, I watch a guy get 7 straight pitches outside the zone, yet strike out. Then the next inning I watch multiple players take strike three fastballs right down the middle. This has gotten ridiculous. Two runs down and it feels like they have no chance.
3 runs down now. With the Brewers pitching, it’s like being down 10.
 
#1,857      
The bats have turned it up a notch today. One hit after 6 innings.
Seiya has gotten totally passive every at bat like he was in previous years.
"If you're keeping score at home" just save some time and put "3 unassisted" across the entire scorecard next to Tucker.
And our best pitcher has a blister.
It was announced today that "Go Cubs Go" has been officially replaced by "Wake Me Up When September Ends"....or if you're Carter Hawkins, "Wake Me Up When 2031 Ends".
 
#1,858      
At least Caissie got his first hit. Second of the day for the Cubs.
 
#1,860      
It would be interesting to see as a fan what steps behind the scenes the Cubs are taking to try and improve their offense. If any.
 
#1,863      
Apparently, Counsel said that he’s giving Tucker multiple days off. So they’ve decided whatever they’d been doing with him before wasn’t working.
It's about time. But the Cubs front office should DFA Counsel and call up a minor league team and manager since that's what they are playing like.
 
Last edited:
#1,865      
Tucker since July 1 (not including today):

37 games - .195/.333/.242, 3 2B, 1HR, 10 RBI.

He’s actually striking out at a career low rate. It’s just weak contact after weak contact over and over for nearly a quarter of the season.
He's cost himself at least $150M, if not more. Betting on yourself works a lot of times in your contract year.....this isn't one of those times. If you're a team interested in him, you can look at it a few ways:

1)He has an injured finger, he's playing through it, he'll be fine in 2026, one year before what will probably be an extended work stoppage.

2)This is his second year in a row with an injury that has derailed a season. Is he injury prone? Is it worth the gamble.

3)This is the first year where 81 of his home games were played outside of a domed stadium. Did the set up in Houston aid in his play?

4)Nuclear scenario.....all of the above.

Before the year started, I was pretty ticked at the Cubs not getting a big time extension wrapped up with him. Now.....I'm not going to be heartbroken if they give him a solid offer, but nothing that buckles the payroll.

If I'm the Cubs, it's 8 years, 240M, then tap out. Even that might be too much. There would have to be a club option/player option built in. This 400M to 500M target....no thanks.
 
Last edited:
#1,866      
Tucker since July 1 (not including today):

37 games - .195/.333/.242, 3 2B, 1HR, 10 RBI.

He’s actually striking out at a career low rate. It’s just weak contact after weak contact over and over for nearly a quarter of the season.
this is one of the most bizarre stat lines I've seen in a while, and this is a player that is extremely motivated to do well with his first free agent contract rapidly approaching. I loved the move for Tucker and still think we traded the right guy between shaw and smith, in fact Shaw is slightly outperforming smith at this point, and I despised the Boras/Belly contract with an out clause every year for 30mil, brutal work by Boras there. I never saw this type of slump coming from Tucker and I keep thinking he is gonna explode for a week of monster production but it just ain't happening. Very very strange.
 
#1,867      
He's cost himself at least $150M, if not more. Betting on yourself works a lot of times in your contract year.....this isn't one of those times. If you're a team interested in him, you can look at it a few ways:

1)He has an injured finger, he's playing through it, he'll be fine in 2026, one year before what will probably be an extended work stoppage.

2)This is his second year in a row with an injury that has derailed a season. Is he injury prone? Is it worth the gamble.

3)This is the first year where 81 of his home games were played outside of a domed stadium. Did the set up in Houston aid in his play?

4)Nuclear scenario.....all of the above.

Before the year started, I was pretty ticked at the Cubs not getting a big time extension wrapped up with him. Now.....I'm not going to be heartbroken if they give him a solid offer, but nothing that buckles the payroll.

If I'm the Cubs, it's 8 years, 240M, then tap out. Even that might be too much. There would have to be a club option/player option built in. This 400M to 500M target....no thanks.
I don’t think teams will be concerned with him being injury prone. Maybe if they were similar type injuries, but not a whole lot of commonality between finger/hand and shin injuries. Injuries happen. And not sure what you mean by the set up in Houston aiding his play. The previous 4 seasons when Tucker made a name for himself in majors, at home he batted .283 with 156 runs, 52 HRs, 174 RBI and 39 steals. He hit .309 away from Houston in same time frame with 151 runs, 58 HRs, 186 RBI and 41 steals. And those away counting stats were accomplished in 95 fewer ABs.

It will be interesting to see where and for how much he signs. Certainly this season isn’t helping his cause, but I don’t think your #2 and #3 will have any impact. Hopefully he can turn it around last month and playoffs and give interested GMs more to think about.
 
#1,868      
I’m curious what people thought about the handling of Horton’s finger issue yesterday. I think they made 3 injury trips to the mound before taking him out (definitely were two). Even if just a hot spot initially, what made them think it wasn’t going to get worse? Why risk an IL trip (or a longer one if blister develops) for arguably your best SP? For that matter, why didn’t they put Tucker on 10-day IL back when he hurt his hand/finger? I get that Tucker likely wouldn’t have been happy to be sidelined, but 10 days off versus a bad two months seems like a prudent move — understanding that easier to say that after the fact.
 
#1,869      
I don’t think teams will be concerned with him being injury prone. Maybe if they were similar type injuries, but not a whole lot of commonality between finger/hand and shin injuries. Injuries happen. And not sure what you mean by the set up in Houston aiding his play. The previous 4 seasons when Tucker made a name for himself in majors, at home he batted .283 with 156 runs, 52 HRs, 174 RBI and 39 steals. He hit .309 away from Houston in same time frame with 151 runs, 58 HRs, 186 RBI and 41 steals. And those away counting stats were accomplished in 95 fewer ABs.

It will be interesting to see where and for how much he signs. Certainly this season isn’t helping his cause, but I don’t think your #2 and #3 will have any impact. Hopefully he can turn it around last month and playoffs and give interested GMs more to think about.
If you were Hoyer, how much is too much at this point?

Playing RF in Wrigley is not easy. When the wind is blowing in, it's damn near impossible to fence one. Conversely, when the wind is blowing out, not much stays in the ballpark.

Last year, how many games did he play? This season, his numbers are average and that's because he will take a walk. He's currently being benched. He's not running out ground balls. He's being boo'd by the most loyal fans in the planet.

If you were the Cubs, would you break the $250M barrier over 8 years to keep him? That's more than $30M per year and let's face it, given the expectations, he's been a bust. There's just no argument against that at this point. Like you said, he can have just an outstanding September, which changes the outlook.

Maybe the expectations were too high, but they were that of a $500M player. That type of money is paid to guys who can carry a team.

To be clear, he's not the only one that's wet the bed the second half of the year. Their ability to score runs, especially late in games, is abysmal. He's a huge part of that.

Edit: In Houston, he had FAR more protection in the order.
 
#1,870      
If Tucker continues to struggle the rest of the season, I wonder if he will be reduced to a one-year prove it deal for 2026. Horrible timing for him with potential work stoppage in 2027.
 
#1,871      
If Tucker continues to struggle the rest of the season, I wonder if he will be reduced to a one-year prove it deal for 2026. Horrible timing for him with potential work stoppage in 2027.
yea, why would anyone commit to a 10 year 500 million dollar deal for him right now ? even the Mets, Dodgers or Yankees ?
 
#1,873      
Kind of amazing as bad as Tucker has been since July 1, his OPS is still .821 and he's scored 79 runs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back