Screw That. We’re Gonna Win This SOB.We’ve now reached the “I just hope we can keep it close” phase of the pregame thread.
Music to my ears. Spring training (including Wrigley West) tourists are hogging and raising the price of all the tee times!Well, that gives me plenty of time to get home after the Cubs home opener.
Get a room you two!Sure, but KenPom and Tovik ratings don't try to fit a curve vs opponent quality- they're both just calculating season-long averages for adjusted off, def, and tempo, so there's no line/curve to tilt (well, you could say there is a curve depending on your frame of reference, but its slope/shape is constrained). Whether a team's games against Q4 opponents tell you anything about their future results against Q1 opponents is a good question, and I like that Torvik allows you to re-rank after performing filters on that. Sample sizes get pretty small though.
Limited inter-connectedness of teams can create a similar-sounding issue. If only one big ten team played one big 12 team, and all the other games were in-conference, that one game would determine how the teams from the two conferences are aligned in the rankings. While B1G and B12 teams have faced each other, those games were mostly a long time ago, so this is a genuine concern.
I agree that 1pt is fairly insignificant. Not sure what you mean by weight-adjusted metrics (edit: but KenPom does employ game weights since he's determined that certain types of games are better indicators of team quality).
What he means is that in the Kenpom algo he weights (changes) the value of a statistic (3 pt field goal just as an example) depending on opponent and venue.Sure, but KenPom and Tovik ratings don't try to fit a curve vs opponent quality- they're both just calculating season-long averages for adjusted off, def, and tempo, so there's no line/curve to tilt (well, you could say there is a curve depending on your frame of reference, but its slope/shape is constrained). Whether a team's games against Q4 opponents tell you anything about their future results against Q1 opponents is a good question, and I like that Torvik allows you to re-rank after performing filters on that. Sample sizes get pretty small though.
Limited inter-connectedness of teams can create a similar-sounding issue. If only one big ten team played one big 12 team, and all the other games were in-conference, that one game would determine how the teams from the two conferences are aligned in the rankings. While B1G and B12 teams have faced each other, those games were mostly a long time ago, so this is a genuine concern.
I agree that 1pt is fairly insignificant. Not sure what you mean by weight-adjusted metrics (edit: but KenPom does employ game weights since he's determined that certain types of games are better indicators of team quality).
I'm not getting those vibes.This is a big time analytics vs vibes game.
Analytics say toss up where Illinois narrowly edging it is tempting, vibes say Michigan game 2.0
Proud of it. I have a cardio class that begins at 5:35.OK, boomer.
Not water aerobics?Proud of it. I have a cardio class that begins at 5:35.
The UConn game was deer in the headlights game. MSG and all. The Michigan game was “long losing streak against us and they were more motivated plays MJ had something to prove. We are a better team now.Not sure which one you're referencing, but we had two. Michigan and UCONN
What are you saying here? That we might see these guys bc we haven’t yet?Of the 48 refs still eligible to ref the Sweet 16 games that neither us or Houston have had ref them in the 1st or 2nd round, a few names stand out:
Courtney Green
Jeff Anderson
DJ Carstensen
Larry Scirotto
Paul Szelc
Time to start drinking early...
As I recall, the crowd wasn’t the issue. It was the Blueblood Refball. Destinies had to be fulfilled. Programs had to be Storied.Kentucky Rupp Arena flashbacks (1984) for me. i certainly hope this time results in a different outcome. Go Illini!
10 AM Brunch Kickoffs. And the whole day is over with by 10 pm worst case. While those guys out east are up past midnight.I hate living in the west coast man. Sporting times are ridiculous
Nebby maybe, especially if they win. Iowa I just don’t see it.Will Nebby/Iowa fans stay back and support fellow B1G team?
The key to this game is free throws.
In all 6 of Houston’s losses their opponents shot a lot more FTs than Houston.
Tenn (76-73 loss)
TN: 23/29
H: 8/11
Texas Tech (90-86 loss)
TT: 24/30
H: 17/21
Iowa State (70-67 loss)
ISU: 11/22
H: 7/11
Arizona (73-66 loss)
AZ: 20/31
H: 18/22
Kansas (69-56 loss)
KS: 18/20
H: 9/9
Arizona (79-74 loss)
AZ: 23/27
H: 10/14
It's a good point really. They're as odd and unique defensively as we are offensively.I sort of understand why people are comping MSU (grrr! Toughness! Taciturn coaches!) but they strike me as pretty different teams.
MSU was the first team to pilot “hey let’s try the Jordan Rules on Keaton Wagler”; add that to their usual ability to rebound, throw in some cheap fouls, Fears kamikaze-ing into the lane and you had a “tough” game.
Houston’s defensive reputation isn’t for shoving people around, it’s for committing so hard to getting 2 guys on the ball and then recovering that you feel like you’re getting all of the downsides of a double-team and no room to take advantage of what that opens up. They’re a jump shooting team. They can be had on the glass. It’ll be extremely “tough” also but not because they’re playing like MSU.
The commentary to this clip is the funniest ever. I want that guy to narrate my life and the illini game
During that era illinois would have end up on the death penalty and Sampson would be relegated to juco coaching never to be heard from again.Fun fact for you young folks, Ron Gunther was ready to hire Sampson but when he showed up at the airport in Oklahoma there was a media contingent waiting for him and he turned around and left without interviewing him. Gunther always acted in stealth mode and was pissed off. Can’t remember if that was when we ended up hiring Self or Weber though.