Is there any chance we could get back Ty? There’s always a few guys each year that enter and come back.
I think the difference is we usually have guards capable of providing a spark off the bench:
2021 - Ayo, Curbelo, Miller, Trent
2022 - Curbelo, Trent, Plummer
2023 - Skyy, Harris, Epps
2024 - DGL, Harmon
(just listing all the guards - somebody played off the bench and provided a spark on each team)
Past year it was no one. And coming year it’ll likely be no one as well.
The Wisconsin game was brutal. Keaton the only ball handler; only played 6 guys. This year will be the same thing in a similar scenario.
It’s just not ideal to have guard depth as a weakness for two seasons in a row. Especially when it’s easily avoidable.
Jake Davis is not a guard.If we are qualifying Curbelo as the "spark" of the bench in 2022 or the 2023 group of Skyy (quitting mid-season), Harris, and Epps then the combination of either Jake Davis or Drej coming off the bench in 2026 absolutely counts.
I think our fanbase is awesome and find demands for it to be lobotomized quite strange and unnecessary.Good god this fanbase is getting worse by the day.
Not to toot my own horn but I think I more or less nailed it calling Vaaks a cross between KJ and Evansville Humrichous. He's just a much bigger and wider human than Wagler despite comparable height/length, he doesn't move in the same way.I see more KJ than I do Keaton. (outside of just being two European guards and looking more alike)
The shot is more like KJ than Keaton — form and creating space off the bounce.
Keaton killed you with poise in his decision making. Called it the “old man game.”
Vaaks is more-so quick and decisive, like Kasparas.
I actually think he can be better than KJ — or definitely more efficient — if he keeps the TOs down (which Kasparas struggled with).
I'm struggling to understand why Brandon Lee would leave at the moment he's all of a sudden needed in this way.Feel like what people would like to see is a lead guard off the bench. That isn’t that crazy a request.
Sure there’s some unrealistic expectations that if we don’t pursue and get Christian Anderson we ought to be shamed.
However, just getting a guard who’d play the Harmon role of 15-20 minutes of the bench would satisfy most people (including me). There’s really no reason that role shouldn’t be attractive for someone looking to jump from the mid majors.
We need depth. The top-end of the roster is good enough.
Keaton’s influence on the returning players hopefully will be seen - top to bottom.number crunchers' dream:
FWLIW, I fully concur that Dre could become a flippin' monster. looking forward to seeing his prograssion
Jake not a guard. I don’t think Andrej is either; but either way, he won’t be coming off the bench THIS year. Point remains that - for this year, we won’t have anyone (real minutes off the bench - guard).If we are qualifying Curbelo as the "spark" of the bench in 2022 or the 2023 group of Skyy (quitting mid-season), Harris, and Epps then the combination of either Jake Davis or Drej coming off the bench in 2026 absolutely counts.
Agree completely w/ the bolded. Andrej is going to want to score a lot and Vaaks will have the ball in his hands a lot. Adding another guy that expects to score 15-20 PPG (like Blackwell) might be disruptive. But adding another big that can rebound and defend and a guard that can handle and defend quick guards makes a lot of sense.I'm fine without adding Blackwell. That would have been a massive get, but I feel like our roster is good enough without adding someone that could potentially cause more selfish styles of play. I would like to add a veteran guard and a change of pace big that can just be a large man under the basket for matchup reasons. These would be our depth 9/10 guys off the bench for break glass injury/foul trouble scenarios.
Again we have assembled a talented roster with a lot of guys that have a wide range of abilities. I've learned to just trust Brad and he will get the guys and will make it work.
Agree with a lot of this. The five position designations haven't been replaced because there isn't a straight-forward way of explaining fit when most 2-4 players have multi-positional fits. For example, Petro fell out of the rotation from poor play but his fate was fully sealed once the staff was comfortable with Wagler taking on ball handling responsibilities.
I usually prefer to write out how many minutes-per-game each player will play to think about lineups and roles.
Once they hit the portal, they are essentially a free agent... though the scholarship continues through the end of the academic year. (until July 1st)I've got a weird practical question about scholarships that probably bothers me more than anyone else cuz I just like to know how stuff works.
Let's say a guy (okay, Ty) enters the portal intending to transfer. Let's say he then decides to come back (not unheard of).
At what point does any scholarship once promised for any future academic years go away? In other words, at what point during the portal/commitment process does the contractual relationship, so to speak, no longer exist? Is it at the moment they declare to transfer, or is it when they sign at another school? Just curious about the logistics of all of this.
Please note I am not in any way implying that he or Brandon would return, but...how does it all work?
Who are these two top 30 FR? Coleman is ranked about #30. Next highest is Morillo at around #60.Quick recap of the offseason so far:
Staff: "It's going to be so great when we build the team around Mirkovic and bring back as many contributors as possible."
Staff: *brings back everyone, adds 2 top 30 freshmen and a top 10 transfer guard*
Board: "What's the plan for backup PG? Who is going to be the guy? How can we trust in freshmen to contribute a season after our top 2 contributors were freshmen?"
It's like last year, but speedrun since the staff brought everything together so quickly.
His potential and the main thing he need to work on is developing his 3-point shot. Secondary, is not having tunnel vision on his drives.Now I'm going to say something that's probably a little out there, but I've been thinking about a lot and have kinda convinced myself of:
Andrej Stojakovic, Lead Guard.
OK, hear me out.
Once we settle into the half court, lead guard in our system is all about running the pick and roll. Stoj didn't really do that much this past season, we used him in a lot of ISOs instead. He's great at finding space and getting to the bucket, which is the primary skill in an ISO, but also helpful as a pick and roll initiator. The primary goal of the pick and roll is actually to get the initiator to the basket. This is the most efficient outcome in pick and rolls. I think #2 is typically initiator shooting from perimeter off the dribble, and #3 is pass out for 3. So if Stoj can work on reading defenses and hitting open shooters, I think he could be a third option to play that lead guard role (not taking the ball up the court so much as switching into the lead guard role at the top of the key in the half court).
He also has every incentive to work on this. I think this is the thing that could unlock his potential as an NBA prospect. I don't know, it's probably just me being crazy, but I've convinced myself at this point that there's something there. Maybe one of you can explain to me why I'm completely off base.
Morillo… maybe not.Who are these two top 30 FR? Coleman is ranked about #30. Next highest is Morillo at around #60.
Typical inflate-ranking on this forum.
My apologies, conflated a video I watched calling him a top 30 talent with top 30 ranking.Who are these two top 30 FR? Coleman is ranked about #30. Next highest is Morillo at around #60.
Typical inflate-ranking on this forum.
Now I'm going to say something that's probably a little out there, but I've been thinking about a lot and have kinda convinced myself of:
Andrej Stojakovic, Lead Guard.
OK, hear me out.
Once we settle into the half court, lead guard in our system is all about running the pick and roll. Stoj didn't really do that much this past season, we used him in a lot of ISOs instead. He's great at finding space and getting to the bucket, which is the primary skill in an ISO, but also helpful as a pick and roll initiator. The primary goal of the pick and roll is actually to get the initiator to the basket. This is the most efficient outcome in pick and rolls. I think #2 is typically initiator shooting from perimeter off the dribble, and #3 is pass out for 3. So if Stoj can work on reading defenses and hitting open shooters, I think he could be a third option to play that lead guard role (not taking the ball up the court so much as switching into the lead guard role at the top of the key in the half court).
He also has every incentive to work on this. I think this is the thing that could unlock his potential as an NBA prospect. I don't know, it's probably just me being crazy, but I've convinced myself at this point that there's something there. Maybe one of you can explain to me why I'm completely off base.
His career assist to turnover is 0.8Now I'm going to say something that's probably a little out there, but I've been thinking about a lot and have kinda convinced myself of:
Andrej Stojakovic, Lead Guard.
OK, hear me out.
Once we settle into the half court, lead guard in our system is all about running the pick and roll. Stoj didn't really do that much this past season, we used him in a lot of ISOs instead. He's great at finding space and getting to the bucket, which is the primary skill in an ISO, but also helpful as a pick and roll initiator. The primary goal of the pick and roll is actually to get the initiator to the basket. This is the most efficient outcome in pick and rolls. I think #2 is typically initiator shooting from perimeter off the dribble, and #3 is pass out for 3. So if Stoj can work on reading defenses and hitting open shooters, I think he could be a third option to play that lead guard role (not taking the ball up the court so much as switching into the lead guard role at the top of the key in the half court).
He also has every incentive to work on this. I think this is the thing that could unlock his potential as an NBA prospect. I don't know, it's probably just me being crazy, but I've convinced myself at this point that there's something there. Maybe one of you can explain to me why I'm completely off base.
Yup.There's a missing piece here. Pretty lame to be relentlessly shamed and propagandized for stating the obvious.
Vaaks seems like a player who could exploit his skillset in a way that turns up the facilitation and turns down the shot hunting.His career assist to turnover is 0.8
The tools are there… but he’s probably got to improve as a decision maker.
In terms of getting to the basket … there’s very few guys more effective in that department (if any). So using the PnR for a downhill drive would obviously make sense.