Illini Football 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
#126      
Glad to hear you say this. When I first saw that Eberhart was moving to WR (perhaps already our #1 most talented player group where playing time will be difficult to come by), my mind instantly went to this place instead............

Are you kidding me? We just moved arguably our #1 incoming Freshman (just days before the start of the season, no less) because he's been a mess trying to learn our complicated new defense. Why in the world would we ever move a talented kid to a place he's going to get completely lost in the shuffle? He'll now never see the field in 2026. And our defense is going to be in huge trouble this season!
Yeah rats a long post. I simply stated , I saw him 2x last season. Dude was a beast at Wide receiver. And unlike most, I think he's fast. Sorry I dont know what all your 3 paragraphs post is. Lmao 😂 😂
 
#127      
Glad to hear you say this. When I first saw that Eberhart was moving to WR (perhaps already our #1 most talented player group where playing time will be difficult to come by), my mind instantly went to this place instead............

Are you kidding me? We just moved arguably our #1 incoming Freshman (just days before the start of the season, no less) because he's been a mess trying to learn our complicated new defense. Why in the world would we ever move a talented kid to a place he's going to get completely lost in the shuffle? He'll now never see the field in 2026. And our defense is going to be in huge trouble this season!
Ok, I get it. People hate new Defense and the Coordinator. 🤣 trust CoachB.. I was not upset with loss. Let Coach play his plan out. He has EARNED, it
 
#129      
I know there were a lot of questions, and likely complainers, but I do not recall it being anywhere near this high against the hire.
Here’s a refresher for anyone who’s interested. Not sure it was 75-80%, but there sure was a lot of skepticism.

 
#131      
Here’s a refresher for anyone who’s interested. Not sure it was 75-80%, but there sure was a lot of skepticism.

just re read about 4-5 pages of that (34-38) . there was mostly negative to meh discussion about BB. don’t recall a post on those pages being enthusiastic. I stand by my earlier comment of this board being 75% against it .

Me ? I always liked him due to his Illinois upbringing , success at Wisc, and him & I sharing Dutch heritage and BB reminding me looks wise of 3/4 of my uncles . His so called sophomoric behavior didn’t bother me as I’ve been accused of that at times .

Happy that he obviously nailed it in his interview with Josh and he’s subsequently proven to be the perfect hire for us . I don’t know who exactly else on that well circulated list we considered , assume LL & Fickell were . Recall discussion Fickell wasn’t really interested , but LL was . Josh made the right choice .

Everyone says how extremely organized BB is . I truly think he stays with us until he retires and gets recognition at that time as our best coach ever .
 
#132      
Here’s a refresher for anyone who’s interested. Not sure it was 75-80%, but there sure was a lot of skepticism.


Here are the reactions to the actual hire, not the search.

When there are people in the search thread thinking we're pulling in Nick Saban-ish, obviously the reaction to prospects like BB will be negative. Once the hire was made, the reactions were much less extremist.

I just find it funny the revisionist history over the last couple of successful seasons of "I was the first to love this hire!" and "BB was always my guy!". Honestly, I think 75% were more of the "eh... this is Illinois" then "we hate this hire".
 
#134      
just re read about 4-5 pages of that (34-38) . there was mostly negative to meh discussion about BB. don’t recall a post on those pages being enthusiastic. I stand by my earlier comment of this board being 75% against it .

Me ? I always liked him due to his Illinois upbringing , success at Wisc, and him & I sharing Dutch heritage and BB reminding me looks wise of 3/4 of my uncles . His so called sophomoric behavior didn’t bother me as I’ve been accused of that at times .

Happy that he obviously nailed it in his interview with Josh and he’s subsequently proven to be the perfect hire for us . I don’t know who exactly else on that well circulated list we considered , assume LL & Fickell were . Recall discussion Fickell wasn’t really interested , but LL was . Josh made the right choice .

Everyone says how extremely organized BB is . I truly think he stays with us until he retires and gets recognition at that time as our best coach ever .
Wasn't worried about his character, people who interacted with him all said that he was a real and genuine person. I was worried about his drinking at the time. Sam Pittman left Arkansas after BB no-show'd to a recruiting visit
 
Last edited:
#135      
As I recall, some folks were concerned that we were getting the immature BB because there was no evidence of a mature BB. Immature BB might have been problematic. Mature BB is one of the best coaches in all of football. I'm glad we have him running our program.
These were my exact thoughts. My nephew attended UWisc at the end of BB's tenure there, and had stories of immature BB.
 
#137      
Here are the reactions to the actual hire, not the search.

When there are people in the search thread thinking we're pulling in Nick Saban-ish, obviously the reaction to prospects like BB will be negative. Once the hire was made, the reactions were much less extremist.

I just find it funny the revisionist history over the last couple of successful seasons of "I was the first to love this hire!" and "BB was always my guy!". Honestly, I think 75% were more of the "eh... this is Illinois" then "we hate this hire".
Skimmed through the whole thread. Hate might be a strong word, but I’d say 75% of posts in the thread were expressing disappointment in the hire.
 
#138      
On CBS Sports sight they have all the Power 4 coaches career records against AP top 25 teams. Bret only has a .338 winning percentage but has coached the most games of all the coaches against top 25 teams. Even more than all the SEC coaches.
 
#139      
I was 100% skeptical and was afraid we were getting Arkansas BB and not this new BB.

1. Happy to be wrong.

2. Goes to show that people don’t always stagnate and can change for the better when they learn and grow from past experiences.
Go look at Arkansas’s schedules during Bret’s time there….insane stuff especially when Bret wouldn’t cheat like the other schools were. A big part of the reason Bret is so pro NIL and Rev sharing.
 
#140      
Go look at Arkansas’s schedules during Bret’s time there….insane stuff especially when Bret wouldn’t cheat like the other schools were. A big part of the reason Bret is so pro NIL and Rev sharing.
Yeah, his strength of schedule at Arkansas according to FPI was:

2013: 12 (3-9)
2014: 3 (7-6)
2015: 7 (8-5)
2016: 6 (7-6)
2017: 31 (4-8)

So his last year was bad. The others were decent to good based on schedule.

For context, his strength of schedule here so far:

2021: 53
2022: 46
2023: 65 (5-7 oof)
2024: 30 (still won 10 games!)
2025: 23 (still won 9 games!)

If Bret had our schedule at Arkansas, he would’ve won 9-10 games a year.
 
Last edited:
#141      
50 years into this fandom business, my default setting on just about every coach and recruit is skepticism. Some call that negativity. Perhaps others say it's a defense mechanism, like a nut cup.

I definitely had skepticism with BB. In fairness, even the Wisconsin version of Bret probably doesn't survive here. I don't know if it was the kids, or just age, but he seems to be a different person and it's set him up for success.
 
#142      
Skimmed through the whole thread. Hate might be a strong word, but I’d say 75% of posts in the thread were expressing disappointment in the hire.
OKay, sorry, I couldn't let this die....

I actually read through the entire thread. If you actually look at the hire thread and look at individual posters vs. the same poster posting the same sentiment 30 times in 30 different ways, the break down is roughly 3 to 1 (slightly less) in favor with about 25% of the posters indifferent or "waiting to see". Which is exactly how I remember it being.

Illinoisloyalty is notorious for letting small groups of negative nancies dictate the feeling or direction of an entire thread or fan base.
 
#143      
Skimmed through the whole thread. Hate might be a strong word, but I’d say 75% of posts in the thread were expressing disappointment in the hire.
I wasn’t skeptical of his abilities, but I questioned how long he would stick around. With JW at the helm and the changes in the game, it was perfect timing where he could really excel here. Very thankful for how things have worked out.
 
#144      
Go look at Arkansas’s schedules during Bret’s time there….insane stuff especially when Bret wouldn’t cheat like the other schools were. A big part of the reason Bret is so pro NIL and Rev sharing.

I was more referencing what seemed like behavior/personality stuff at Arkansas as opposed to schedule.

But yeah, dude had a crazy tough road to succeed there.

He definitely got an insightful look under the hood of the SEC machine, which means he truly was the perfect hire right as NIL was coming around.
 
#146      
OKay, sorry, I couldn't let this die....

I actually read through the entire thread. If you actually look at the hire thread and look at individual posters vs. the same poster posting the same sentiment 30 times in 30 different ways, the break down is roughly 3 to 1 (slightly less) in favor with about 25% of the posters indifferent or "waiting to see". Which is exactly how I remember it being.

Illinoisloyalty is notorious for letting small groups of negative nancies dictate the feeling or direction of an entire thread or fan base.
No need to count posts, there was a poll!
2395.png

90% rated the hire an A or B. Can't remember exactly but I rated him an A if not B. Simpletons like me saw a former big ten champion coach and figured that was a good thing
 
#147      

Evidence continues to pile up that the staff isn’t thrilled about the WRs

(1) Bielema makes the statement at B1G media days
(2) Eberhart being moved from secondary to WR
(3) Bringing in a very late transfer WR
 
#150      
Evidence continues to pile up that the staff isn’t thrilled about the WRs

(1) Bielema makes the statement at B1G media days
(2) Eberhart being moved from secondary to WR
(3) Bringing in a very late transfer WR
This is so weird to me.

The IlliniInquirer podcast guys have continued to state Platt has been a marquee addition. And Dixon and Clement are already proven products.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back