Illinois 120, Fairleigh Dickinson 45 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#176      
Yes…. guys that play well fast🙂 Wagler did great with keeping a snails pace. Coleman looks like he plays better up tempo …. the game was fast last night and the passing was quick with very little dribbling… interesting change! Fun stuff…. run run run🙂
Fascinating. Coleman is definitely twitchier, but that's a fairly significant shift for one player.
 
#179      
To put this further into perspective:

Illinois scored 1.591 points per possession.
FDU scored 0.597 points per possession.

That mathematically means that if the two teams played 100 possessions, Illinois would win by:

159.1 - 59.7 = 99.4 points (!)

.....

The actual game was 75 possessions and Illinois won by.... 75 points.
 
Last edited:
#180      
It was probably just a bad game and ramping up to real moments that matter, but it seemed like they're working on something with him that's giving him some hesitancy on the defensive end. Not sure if it's getting burned on pump fakes or something, but he seemed like he was second-guessing himself on the defense, or just didn't really have the dog in him that I remembered last year. Honestly, I was thinking that he looked more like Carey Booth on defense than the Z we know and love. I'm sure it's just ramp-up stuff that he'll get past.
Hope so.

Makes me wonder if he's nursing some injury. He looks stiff at times.
 
#181      
...

You think someone who’s one of the greatest offensive minds of his generation (crafted the #3, #14, and #2 offenses in the country by age 29 (the first 3 offenses of his career) and is on pace for the #1 offense at 30) was a hire worth criticizing as our 5th and lowest paid assistant at 24?
...
There is a big difference between questioning and criticizing. I saw far more questioning in the forum than criticizing.
 
#182      
There is a big difference between questioning and criticizing. I saw far more questioning in the forum than criticizing.
This is all from is from one recruiting thread in 2023. We made the E8 in large part due to Tyler’s evaluations and offensive design that very season:

IMG_1917.jpeg
IMG_1918.jpeg
IMG_1920.jpeg
IMG_1921.jpeg
IMG_1922.jpeg
IMG_1923.jpeg

The hire was heavily criticized here and elsewhere.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1916.jpeg
    IMG_1916.jpeg
    160.6 KB · Views: 104
Last edited:
#187      
This is all from is from one recruiting thread in 2023. We made the E8 in large part due to Tyler’s evaluations and offensive design that very season:

View attachment 52379
View attachment 52380
View attachment 52381
View attachment 52382
View attachment 52383
View attachment 52384

The hire was heavily criticized here and elsewhere.
Crossed wires? These posts seem to criticize Brad for the hire which is different than criticizing Tyler. My comment was about Tyler. There were more questions of Tyler's readiness than criticisms (this does not imply there were no criticisms). There were many criticisms of BU.

I'll freely admit that I'm one of the people who questioned the choice to hire Tyler and Zach. Tyler as an offensive coach has worked out great. Zach on defense was (IMO) a disaster. I give the blame for that to BU for sticking with Zach when it was clear he didn't have it. You can't blame the new hire for trying their best.
 
#189      
Every recruit we are interested in should get a copy of this game and be asked, "Do you want to play in this system?" The answer should be, "Where do I sign?"
 
#190      
Feels like splitting hairs a bit with the “questioned it” vs “criticized it”. I think the salient point is that no matter which of those camps you were in: you were wrong.
 
#191      
Tyler's hire and push through the program was unequivocally nepotism, he was not qualified in an objective resume sense for the jobs he got, and everybody knows perfectly well there is absolutely zero chance whatsoever the same guy named Tyler Jones gets those jobs. There's no subtlety to any of that, it's not a close call, TU just got pushed directly toward full assistant coach status in the Big Ten the second his playing eligibility expired because his Dad wanted it that way.

But real life does not always operate on the principles of objective qualifications and just desserts. Brad believed in his son, and while fathers have been regularly wrong about that in every line of work throughout human history, Brad was very, very right.

Nepotism is, in the aggregate, a path to mediocrity and unfairness and failure. But there are exceptions to every rule.

Tyler is an extraordinary young basketball mind and we are very lucky to have him. Nobody needs to apologize to anybody for the wrong process having the right result.
 
Last edited:
#192      
😂Hey, I’ll eat my plate of crow. Happily.

Tyler deserves a metric ton of credit for his effort and results.
Questioning or “criticizing” the hire at the time was perfectly reasonable in the realm of a fan message board.
I don’t think a single person on this board could have predicted this type of success.

Coaches kid is clearly a basketball sponge and analytic student that has earned his place.
 
#193      
Tyler's hire and push through the program was unequivocally nepotism, he was not qualified in an objective resume sense for the jobs he got, and everybody knows perfectly well there is absolutely zero chance whatsoever the same guy named Tyler Jones gets those jobs. There's no subtlety to any of that, it's not a close call, TU just got pushed directly toward full assistant coach status in the Big Ten the second his playing eligibility expired because his Dad wanted it that way.

But real life does not always operate on the principles of objective qualifications and just desserts. Brad believed in his son, and while fathers have been regularly wrong about that in every line of work throughout human history, Brad was very, very right.

Nepotism is, in the aggregate, a path to mediocrity and unfairness and failure. But there are exceptions to every rule.

Tyler is an extraordinary young basketball mind and we are very lucky to have him. Nobody needs to apologize to anybody for the wrong process having the right result.

Not to mention the “fool us once” carry over from the Football Smiths.
 
#194      
Tyler was a grad assistant for like 2 years before he even had a real role on the staff. Then he had a hand in recruiting and scouting, but was NOT an official assistant until the 23-24 season. He had spent time at two lower levels prior to becoming an assistant coach.

Not the fast-track that everyone seems to be framing it as.

It also isn’t just his dad pushing him through these promotions. It has to go through the Athletic Director, it has to go through the Administration and hiring Committees, and as a third process has to be approved by the Board of Directors.

If we want to say all of those people were wrong in granting these promotions… well, okay.
 
#195      
To put this further into perspective:

Illinois scored 1.591 points per possession.
FDU scored 0.597 points per possession.

That mathematically means that if the two teams played 100 possessions, Illinois would win by:

159.1 - 59.7 = 99.4 points (!)

.....

The actual game was 75 possessions and Illinois won by.... 75 points.
Very cool, but I'd pump the brakes on getting too jazzed. FDU is KP 341. Gonna be curious to see how the the pace adjustments translate against Duke & UConn. Duke is deep, and UConn will dictate pace like they do against everyone.

Butler currently mauling FDU by 23 at the half.
 
#196      
Tyler was a grad assistant for like 2 years before he even had a real role on the staff. Then he had a hand in recruiting and scouting, but was NOT an official assistant until the 23-24 season. He had spent time at two lower levels prior to becoming an assistant coach.

Not the fast-track that everyone seems to be framing it as.

It also isn’t just his dad pushing him through these promotions. It has to go through the Athletic Director, it has to go through the Administration and hiring Committees, and as a third process has to be approved by the Board of Directors.

If we want to say all of those people were wrong in granting these promotions… well, okay.

To Gritty's point if someone named Tyler Jones had played under BU for 4 years, been a grad assistant, video assistant, etc and showed the same ability/insight as TU its not unrealistic think he might have gotten the job too.
 
#197      
Tyler was a grad assistant for like 2 years before he even had a real role on the staff. Then he had a hand in recruiting and scouting, but was NOT an official assistant until the 23-24 season. He had spent time at two lower levels prior to becoming an assistant coach.

Not the fast-track that everyone seems to be framing it as.

It also isn’t just his dad pushing him through these promotions. It has to go through the Athletic Director, it has to go through the Administration and hiring Committees, and as a third process has to be approved by the Board of Directors.

If we want to say all of those people were wrong in granting these promotions… well, okay.
I think jumping from recruiting/scouting to offensive coordinator is a fast-track, at least at a program with top 10 aspirations. Perhaps it was obvious to everyone involved that he was an offensive genius, making it a justified fast-track, but it's still a fast-track. That he was family made it easy to wonder
 
#198      
To Gritty's point if someone named Tyler Jones had played under BU for 4 years, been a grad assistant, video assistant, etc and showed the same ability/insight as TU its not unrealistic think he might have gotten the job too.
I think jumping from recruiting/scouting to offensive coordinator is a fast-track, at least at a program with top 10 aspirations. Perhaps it was obvious to everyone involved that he was an offensive genius, making it a justified fast-track, but it's still a fast-track. That he was family made it easy to wonder

I agree it was faster than most progressions.

He didn’t go straight from recruiting/scouting to offensive coordinator though. I believe he spent a year as an assistant before gaining OC title (could be wrong).

I had an engineer in my group who we took on straight out of college as an associate developer. He was so good after 6-8 months we dropped the associate part in his title. Then after two more years he was contributing across the whole stack and pushed for a senior title. I said if we didn’t give it to him he was going to walk. Management approved. Three more years and another promotion to staff level. He was 28. No nepotism there, his dad is an airline pilot lol.

I agree there’s nepotism there with Tyler. I just don’t think it’s as grossly egregious as it’s being framed though. Guy is a savant.
 
#199      
I agree it was faster than most progressions.

He didn’t go straight from recruiting/scouting to offensive coordinator though. I believe he spent a year as an assistant before gaining OC title (could be wrong).

I had an engineer in my group who we took on straight out of college as an associate developer. He was so good after 6-8 months we dropped the associate part in his title. Then after two more years he was contributing across the whole stack and pushed for a senior title. I said if we didn’t give it to him he was going to walk. Management approved. Three more years and another promotion to staff level. He was 28. No nepotism there, his dad is an airline pilot lol.

I agree there’s nepotism there with Tyler. I just don’t think it’s as grossly egregious as it’s being framed though. Guy is a savant.
Sounds like we agree more than not.

As for the timing, I'm going off this from the Gazette:
"When the NCAA changed the rule to allow two more on-court assistants ahead of the 2023-24 season, Underwood moved up from his previous role as director of recruiting and scouting to offensive coordinator."

And similarly from Yahoo/Sporting News:
"He spent his first two seasons as the director of recruiting and scouting. Underwood was then promoted to an assistant coach while also serving as the team's offensive coordinator. "
 
#200      
Sounds like we agree more than not.

As for the timing, I'm going off this from the Gazette:
"When the NCAA changed the rule to allow two more on-court assistants ahead of the 2023-24 season, Underwood moved up from his previous role as director of recruiting and scouting to offensive coordinator."

And similarly from Yahoo/Sporting News:
"He spent his first two seasons as the director of recruiting and scouting. Underwood was then promoted to an assistant coach while also serving as the team's offensive coordinator. "
Here's the way I look at it:

Today, Tyler is one of the brightest offensive minds in the country. He's crafted 4 offenses and all 4 will finish top 15 in efficiency with 3 of the 4 in the top 5. He innovated the way Illinois scouts and recruits talent and his evaluations have resulted in an E8 and F4.

Did he work his way up the ladder quickly? Yes.
More quickly than he deserved? Maybe to the outside world. But inside the program, I'm sure his value was obvious then just like it is to all of us now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back