What we needed is maybe one less 2/3 on the wing and instead one more power 4 with some junk in the trunk to back up Mirk at the 4 if Jason can't do it. Settles had 13 boards in 25 min and out rebounded us by double digits! Length alone doesnt equate to rebounding every night if good teams have a guy like that. We have several to basically fill in for Jake and i know that no one is Mirk but we shouldve added a power 4 that can rebound and we didnt. After Mirk we have no one to deal with a dude built to crash the glass. I wish we had a Georgi B or Charles Oakley or TKR type of body not that complete player but to just rebound or as insurance in case Mirk got hurt but we don't. Many said our slim dudes in today's game can do it. They felt someone like Andre or others can match up at the 4. We'll not against a strong body like Settles they couldn't. He owned the glass and we couldn't match up. Hopefully we dont run into many guys like that before Mirk is back because losing on the boards by double digits is tough to overcomeCruz carried the ball all game long.........it's something that perturbs me greatly .....it really really does ........
we had zero leadership on the court in the first half..........some tried but after we tied it at 17-17 the wheels came off , the axle broke and the radiator was hissing on our offensive play till halftime.........
adjustments were made and we played with purpose but the mistakes and missed FT's and the lack of defensive rebounding in the second half spelled doom and gloom for the Illini.........
I feel if we had ever got the lead especially when we closed to 68-66 that the game might have turned to our side .........but when they got 5 offensive rebounds and then hit a 3 , it seemed to take some wind out of our sails........
to overcome a 20 point halftime deficit takes so much effort and hitting 70 % of our FT's would have reinforced our will to overcome such a big lead by TT ......
Mirko-Man and Jake Davis .....get healthy , we need your leadership and talent ............we really really do .............
Just saw the stat that TTU is #1 out of 365 D-1 teams in college basketball experience. Going into that environment against the most experienced team in CBB was probably a taller hill than some of us imagined.Lmao it’s a young team early in the season, it’s kind of how it goes. TTU started 3 5th year seniors and we started 3 freshman. These are the times that Jake and Mirk are sorely missed but I’d be worried if we rolled over and lost like in 24-25 going in down 20 at the half.
They (especially QC) showed a sh!t ton of grit, once Mirk gets back healthy I think this is going to be a different team.
I had this thought during the end of the first half last night, but it didn’t materialize until looking at this chart now.
Agility and athleticism matter way more than height. It’s ridiculous to think that having the taller lineup makes you automatically better. An agile 6’8 guy will routinely beat an immobile 7’1 guy for rebounds.Texas Tech had an offensive rebound on 47.4% of their missed FGs. That’s a putrid rate surrendered on Illinois’s part (9th percentile).
Last year, Illinois only surrendered a 27.4% OREB rate on missed FGs, which was 19th best in the country.
….
On Torvik, Illinois is listed as 8th in average height, while Texas Tech is 292nd.
I mean we totally changed what we were doing at both ends at halftime. Ball screens on offense and switching and drop coverage on defense. Plus shortening the bench and slowing the game down a bit. Tech, who were extremely well prepared for what we attacked them with in the first half, had no idea what hit them for the first 10-12 minutes of the second.This feels far more relevant to the disparity in performance in the 1H vs 2H, and proven through real data instead of just 'vibes'.
To be honest, I’m not sure even the coaching staff knows the answer to that question until Mirkovic is back. Not a criticism of the staff at all. When you’re playing a ton of freshmen, a new transfer, and you’re missing your best player (and on the short list of best players in college basketball), it’s going to be hard to know that answer.I mean we totally changed what we were doing at both ends at halftime. Ball screens on offense and switching and drop coverage on defense. Plus shortening the bench and slowing the game down a bit. Tech, who were extremely well prepared for what we attacked them with in the first half, had no idea what hit them for the first 10-12 minutes of the second.
That leaves us with a bit of a mystery in the aftermath. Who are we?
Especially if the 6-8 guy is strong, tenacious, and has high court IQ. Remember Ken Norman and Robert Bennett? The latter was only about 6-5. He'd go to the boards with anybody. I forgot Sergio, who was only about 6-3 but extremely strong and focused. Some thought that inch for inch, he was the best rebounder in the county,Agility and athleticism matter way more than height. It’s ridiculous to think that having the taller lineup makes you automatically better. An agile 6’8 guy will routinely beat an immobile 7’1 guy for rebounds.
I mean we totally changed what we were doing at both ends at halftime. Ball screens on offense and switching and drop coverage on defense. Plus shortening the bench and slowing the game down a bit. Tech, who were extremely well prepared for what we attacked them with in the first half, had no idea what hit them for the first 10-12 minutes of the second.
That leaves us with a bit of a mystery in the aftermath. Who are we?
Coleman-ILL 8-19 FT, TT 23-26
-ILL 32 Rebounds, TT 43
-ILL 29% 3 PT %
-Stefan Vaaks
How did we only lose by 6?
Yeah, I've defended Z quite a bit lately, but I'm officially stepping down from that podium. I just don't think he has the intangibles or feel for the game to be consistently effective, despite having all the physical tools in the world. Hard to believe he shot 38% from three during his first two years at Kentucky and ArkansasI listened to Inquirer post game pod after this post and Werner/Tausk put it great "Z is unplayable right now".And sadly we're having to play him.
Im not gonna sit here and pretend to be the leader of the Jakstys fan club as he is what he is at this level....an end of bench big. But if I'm gonna have to play a backup big 10-12 minutes a game. id prefer the guy showing some toughness and will battle down on the block.
Tomi has got his fair share of deserved criticism over the course of time but.he gave 30 minutes last night. Probably can't expect much more than that at his size and their pace but those 10 minutes he wasn't on the floor as their big were ugly
How can he do work in the lane on offense if he is 22 ft. From the rim. The way they use Z on offense is the dumbest thing they could do. He is out of the lane so the others can penetrate so he is never going to get offensive rebounds. I believe if you look at the time he was in the game in the first half, his plus minus was about zero. He is playing like someone who knows if he makes a mistake, on the bench he goes. They could surely figure out a way to play an occasional high, low while he is in the game.Z needs to get the message that he is a rim protector and should do his work in the lane on both ends of the court. He is still a very valuable member of the team if he can focus on that — we have plenty of other guys who can shoot the three.
Great stat and case in point. Playing no one it's fine running around launching 30 footers. Duke it wont play at all, Uconn, etc.. I would run Ethan and Z into dirt until they he get Defensive message. If his back can hold up.
You forgot 16 turnovers and a -8 on the offensive glass.-ILL 8-19 FT, TT 23-26
-ILL 32 Rebounds, TT 43
-ILL 29% 3 PT %
-Stefan Vaaks
How did we only lose by 6?
Lot of similarities in Baylor and tech game.On its own, this one stings. But, coupled with the Baylor exhibition, which was very similar, alarm bells have to be ringing in that locker room.
And they have Toppin back.Would love to see them again in March when we are healthy and the freshman aren't in their real first game