I disagree -- they love both Boyd and Clayton. They are playing it sly naming Boyd as the back-up because they do not want Clayton to get down just because Boyd is slightly ahead this year with his extra year in the system, when they view them as equal long-term candidates to be starter next...
Morez at pick #9 was the highest drafted non-freshman in the country. Sure he made more free throws this year that allowed him to stay at the end of games, but seriously ... the #9 pick wasn't even just one of the better players in the conference?
He lost minutes at Illinois because he was playing behind Humrichous, who coach hoped would get out of his slump. Underwood is a fantastic coach, but this was a misstep -- Morez was already one of the better players in the B1G.
Athletics 2027 mock Sam Vecenie: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7368866/2026/06/25/nba-draft-2027-prospects-tyran-stokes/
Mirk #13
Coleman #18
No one else in top 48.
I can see why you discount the staff watching Lee in practice and games for a year. We all know that incoming guards turn out exactly like their High School rankings.
I agree that if we keep Boyd and Clayton in the fold, perhpas Lopati isn't the best use of our limited money when he likely would not have won the job as a true freshman and then would have left anyways.
Me too -- was so strange he was a .240 3-point shooter for us over two years, now is shooting like he did in H.S. But you can't play a shooting guard who can't shoot....
If the market is overvaluing mediocre guys with P4 experience vs. the talented hard-working P5s with great PFF grades for better production, we are doing exactly the right thing.
Indiana just won a title with those JMU guys.