B1G really ought to take a position now on how they are going to assess the final standings, given that it is pretty clear that Michigan will play 3 fewer games than anyone else. If the powers that be wait until the mess (arising from possible conflicting interpretations) arrives (or becomes more easily predictable, e.g., after today's game), then their ultimate decision is going to be tainted by conjecture of favoritism, or decision-making based on a goal of satisfying a subjective preference rather than on principles.
Anyone think that they would consider offering co-titles if "total wins" (or games over .500) and winning percentage provide different "winners"?.