Please don't ever say that againThat almost seems like something a B10 commissioner would be involved in.![]()
Please don't ever say that againThat almost seems like something a B10 commissioner would be involved in.![]()
I wish that we had a 'curious' or 'interesting' button to go along with 'Like.' If there is something to this, I am curious what may be going on behind the scenes. Oregon, Washington, Stanford, and Cal looking to join the B1G once we have a new commissioner?
We so easily sort tribally and react based on what are "our" interests versus "their" interests.I'm sorry, but I need to keep going. This is why posting random tweets from unknown sources is fundamentally bad. This isn't a reporter or someone within the conference. This guy is a plumber (read his bio). Despite the name, they clearly don't know anything about the Big 12 if they haven't even figured out how to access their favorite conference's games over the last 4 years. Then, instead of thinking there might be a logical explanation, they immediately jump to the conclusion that it's a conspiracy. Now, for some reason, we have this conspiracy existing on this messageboard. We don't have to live like this. We can and should choose to be better. Check your sources. Don't post conspiracies from randos.
We so easily sort tribally and react based on what are "our" interests versus "their" interests.
But how does a programming decision like that serve college sports as a pastime, something people care about?
Allen Fieldhouse isn't an asset you throw overboard in the name of efficiency.
That almost seems like something a B10 commissioner would be involved in.![]()
Careful.....CARFEUL don't you dare jinx us like that. 1st successful AD we have in a while, and you are bringing bad ju ju by the mere suggestion of him as a B1G commissioner. An excellent one by the way, but more like10 years down the road after we win a natty in men's BB, women's BB and football.That almost seems like something a B10 commissioner would be involved in.![]()
I had the same thought.
Though I bet if JW became commish we’d hang another banner in SFC.
Right that wrong REAL fast.
And like, sure, that's all fine.Yes, putting college sports behind a paywall is bad. Yes, losing tradition in college sports is bad. But you know what else is bad, being too ignorant to take a second to understand why a game isn't flexed to a network you have and jumping to blame it on a conspiracy.
And like, sure, that's all fine.
But when the sports industry has shriveled into a shadow of its former self 25 years from now, people are going to look back and wonder why people didn't see it coming. A major, major reason why is that the party best positioned to advocate for the long term health of the business - the fans, us - placed way more cultural cache and status on being able to simulate savvy insider understanding of the forces involved than on advocating straightforwardly for our own interests.
A future of college sports that doesn't have a spotlight for Kansas basketball is a smaller, lesser college sports, and market dynamics that push down that path are toxic to the long term health of this industry we love. The why is not important. The why is the enemy.
Step 1 is saying it's bad. Which sounds kinda simple and dumb, but when you actually wade into this topic on the internet, that's very very rarely a checkpoint that's actually hit.What I don't get is how you propose to solve this
lol, no. Why would Whitman open a can of worms? He's way too smart for that.
Well deserved spot on the conference leadership team, but no chance he's being considered for commissioner (not that he wouldn't be a VG one). Sounds like the BIG is going to divvy up some of Warren's responsibilities. Don't sleep on the female candidate (whose name escapes me, lol).
LOL, I mean, yes, there is absolutely a greater conversation to be had about the health of college sports. We have it on here regularly. Goodness knows you love to spearhead it and, frankly, I always appreciate reading your position on it. Ultimately, the Venn diagram between your position and mine has a ton of overlap. However, I'm not going to engage further in this conversation due to how it's been brought up. That fundamentally matters to me. Conspiracy theorist tweets from know-nothings need to be shot down immediately. If you really want to dig in and do it, find a better way to start the conversation.And like, sure, that's all fine.
But when the sports industry has shriveled into a shadow of its former self 25 years from now, people are going to look back and wonder why people didn't see it coming. A major, major reason why is that the party best positioned to advocate for the long term health of the business - the fans, us - placed way more cultural cache and status on being able to simulate savvy insider understanding of the forces involved than on advocating straightforwardly for our own interests.
A future of college sports that doesn't have a spotlight for Kansas basketball is a smaller, lesser college sports, and market dynamics that push down that path are toxic to the long term health of this industry we love. The why is not important. The why is the enemy.
I mean I don't know man. Is the CEO of ESPN up in a smoke-filled conference room in Manhattan (New York, not Kansas) twirling his mustache thinking of ways to crush the innocent hopes and dreams of noble message board posters of the Great Plains? Of course not.Conspiracy theorist tweets from know-nothings need to be shot down immediately.
Tellin’ ya. Get a firestick or something similar from someone who knows coding and you can get everything.I mean I don't know man. Is the CEO of ESPN up in a smoke-filled conference room in Manhattan (New York, not Kansas) twirling his mustache thinking of ways to crush the innocent hopes and dreams of noble message board posters of the Great Plains? Of course not.
Are ESPN's imperial ambitions for and increasing emphasis and focus on the College Football Playoff a proximate cause of immense damage being done to the sport, to the point they deserve a middle finger for a silly small-potatoes programming decision? I think that's a pretty fair argument.
We're hurtling toward a world where by sheer blunt force of January neutral site football revenues from a handful of teams, Texas A&M vs South Carolina basketball is imbued with more attention and more broadcast resources than Kansas State vs Kansas. That sucks! That is not out with the old in with the new, that is just a world in which college basketball is smaller and lesser and worse.
Trust me, I, too, think it sucks. I also think corporations are fundamentally bad. I just don't think corporations are pulling some clandestine sh*t. I think they're doing it out in the open. ESPN, like quite literally everything, is trying to extract max profit as quickly as possible, repercussions be damned. And yes, you've talked about the repercussions and I tend to agree with you. You're preaching to the choir.I mean I don't know man. Is the CEO of ESPN up in a smoke-filled conference room in Manhattan (New York, not Kansas) twirling his mustache thinking of ways to crush the innocent hopes and dreams of noble message board posters of the Great Plains? Of course not.
Are ESPN's imperial ambitions for and increasing emphasis and focus on the College Football Playoff a proximate cause of immense damage being done to the sport, to the point they deserve a middle finger for a silly small-potatoes programming decision? I think that's a pretty fair argument.
We're hurtling toward a world where by sheer blunt force of January neutral site football revenues from a handful of teams, Texas A&M vs South Carolina basketball is imbued with more attention and more broadcast resources than Kansas State vs Kansas. That sucks! That is not out with the old in with the new, that is just a world in which college basketball is smaller and lesser and worse.
lol, no. Why would Whitman open a can of worms? He's way too smart for that.
I have a fire stick, but know nothing about coding and have few friends. One out of three ain’t bad, right?Tellin’ ya. Get a firestick or something similar from someone who knows coding and you can get everything.
Totally circumvents ‘media deals’ that limit availability… not that I have one… a friend of mine does….
Love the post, but I encourage you to noodle on the tension between these two statements.I also agree with you that the only thing that can possibly stop it is fan backlash.
Where we disagree, is that I see our guy Russ the Plummer as the fundamental problem
Fair enough, but it's the "in that moment part" where I fear the Russ the Plumbers of the world will fail us. There's a short window to change things. Miss it, and it's too late.Love the post, but I encourage you to noodle on the tension between these two statements.
Not every Tottenham fan would have been able to communicate their objection to the ESL situation in a way the would have made a lick of sense, but in that moment they were on the side of the angels.
@KStateGoober might not know much, and if the TV revenue situation were flipped he might well have the exact opposite self-serving opinion. But you go to war with the army you've got, not the one you wish you had.
I don't like being fatalist this way, but honestly? We're too late.Fair enough, but it's the "in that moment part" where I fear the Russ the Plumbers of the world will fail us. There's a short window to change things. Miss it, and it's too late.
I put it to you Greg...Where we disagree, is that I see our guy Russ the Plummer as the fundamental problem, not just with sports, but society in general.