Pregame: Illinois vs Duke, Saturday, September 12th, 2:30pm CT, FS1

Status
Not open for further replies.
#201      
Houser is a great pickup. I like the accuracy, decision making and quick release. He is certainly more athletic on the move that I first thought. Hopefully that continues. Although I am concerned somewhat about the run defense, and the fact that we are missing a great receiver, injuries are part of the game and I think we win this one 33-27. We beat them handily last year and there no reason for me to think that we cannot do it again.
 
#202      
If their QB looks anything close to what he did against Tulane….. we win. Frankly might just need to get to double digits. One of the most uninspiring QB performances I’ve seen in a while from a P4 team.
 
#203      
Week 1 is a pathological liar and all that, but you just kind of inherently have to feel good about a football game in which it seems like your team has the better quarterback.

The single most positive thing for me about the UAB game was the way Houser and Lunney already seemed to be so in sync and operating the offense in an advanced way together.

That was a process of growth over Altmyer's three years here, and I was concerned about losing that. If we're starting from a higher floor this time around that's awesome news.

Thats connection happening quickly shows the clear difference between a guy who had almost no experience under his belt vs one who has a ton of starts already. You also see what is happening at Michigan with Underwood and its really risky to trust your team to a young guy without college experience. I doubt at this point we ever do that again unless there aren't options.
 
#205      
Thats connection happening quickly shows the clear difference between a guy who had almost no experience under his belt vs one who has a ton of starts already. You also see what is happening at Michigan with Underwood and its really risky to trust your team to a young guy without college experience. I doubt at this point we ever do that again unless there aren't options.
agree

Arch Manning was supposedly the second coming of Johnny Unitas and Sark didnt trust him for two years .
it is very rare that a frosh can come in and play better than a good Jr or Sr. not at that position
 
#207      
This site has 70% of public money on IL:

IMG_1513.jpeg

 
#208      
This game makes me nervous. Going to be a challenge. Hopefully, we'll get to see more of Houser and improve our run defense.
 
#209      
34-31 Illinois.

Very well may lose the TOP battle again, but come out victorious. Duke will get into the Endzone on the occasions that UAB settled for 3. We have the last possession of the game, and clock manage it to perfection, ending with a Moczulski FG to win it.

3 Throwing TD's: Clement, Abney, Trimble.
1 Rushing TD: Laughery.
 
#212      
Illinois 31
Duke 29
 
#217      
Duke: 27
Illinois: 17

Our lack of talent on the two lines will hurt us. Their RB is also great, and their scheme generates lots of pressure. It’s just not a good combination.
 
#218      
I think our offense will start slow but get better, think we'll be humming when Platt gets back, and I think our defense will be better than expected but still not great. Illini 27-17
 
#220      
Can someone explain this to me like I’m 5? 65% of the money is on Illinois to cover the spread, yet the spread has dropped from -8.5 IL to -5.5.

IMG_1518.jpeg
 
#221      
27-23 Illini
W/out Brown im not sure any amount of tackling drills will help a defense that quick although should be a jump from week one to two but some things like size you can’t coach in a week obviously
 
#225      
Can someone explain this to me like I’m 5? 65% of the money is on Illinois to cover the spread, yet the spread has dropped from -8.5 IL to -5.5.

View attachment 51584
Perhaps it's 65% of the bets, but but BIGGER bets have landed on the Duke side?
100 bets for $10 for Illinois vrs a single bet of $10k for Duke brings the spread down to cover the books keeping money even and then people start to go back Illimois way in bets,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back