Home
Forums
New Posts
Illini Basketball
Illini Football
Sports Talk
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Sports
Illini Basketball
Penn State 71, Illinois 67 POSTGAME
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrOizo" data-source="post: 1270602" data-attributes="member: 66798"><p>Link? I don't believe that's true that Tate had a better +/- than TJL. That said, funny enough I absolutely do not love TJL and I doubt others do. I can't wait for Frazier to arrive and hope he starts over TJL only because TJL still has a long way to go and is a liability in many respects (mainly outside shooting). But compared to Tate and Abrams, TJL is better and it's not close to me. </p><p></p><p>Without +/-, here are the rough stats: </p><p></p><p>TJL: 25 mins, 4 pts on 2 for 8 (25%), 2 reb, 3/1 A/TO, 3 steals, </p><p>Tate: 15 mins, 0 pts on 0 for 1 (0%), 0 reb, 3/1 A/TO, 0 steals, </p><p>Abrams: 15 mins, 2 pts on 1 for 5 (20%), 1 reb, 1/1 A/TO, 1 steal</p><p></p><p>Those stats are closer than they have been in a long time. Bad stat line by TJL based on recent performances. Normal utter lack of production for Tate and Abrams. Still, the only way Tate has a better +/- is if he happened to be in the game when Malcolm was taking over in the first or second half with lots of isolation, or when JCL's shots started dropping. I didn't see much that I liked from Tate as usual.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrOizo, post: 1270602, member: 66798"] Link? I don't believe that's true that Tate had a better +/- than TJL. That said, funny enough I absolutely do not love TJL and I doubt others do. I can't wait for Frazier to arrive and hope he starts over TJL only because TJL still has a long way to go and is a liability in many respects (mainly outside shooting). But compared to Tate and Abrams, TJL is better and it's not close to me. Without +/-, here are the rough stats: TJL: 25 mins, 4 pts on 2 for 8 (25%), 2 reb, 3/1 A/TO, 3 steals, Tate: 15 mins, 0 pts on 0 for 1 (0%), 0 reb, 3/1 A/TO, 0 steals, Abrams: 15 mins, 2 pts on 1 for 5 (20%), 1 reb, 1/1 A/TO, 1 steal Those stats are closer than they have been in a long time. Bad stat line by TJL based on recent performances. Normal utter lack of production for Tate and Abrams. Still, the only way Tate has a better +/- is if he happened to be in the game when Malcolm was taking over in the first or second half with lots of isolation, or when JCL's shots started dropping. I didn't see much that I liked from Tate as usual. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Sports
Illini Basketball
Penn State 71, Illinois 67 POSTGAME
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…