Home
Forums
New Posts
Illini Basketball
Illini Football
Sports Talk
Log in
Register
What's new
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Sports
Illini Football
Wisconsin 25, Illinois 21 Postgame
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1970 John" data-source="post: 1953894" data-attributes="member: 589602"><p>I’m wholly not the expert, but holding seems the greatest missed or phantom calls. There’s a lot going on down on the field for what’s really too few eyes to see it all, particularly down on the field. </p><p></p><p>The video review is supposed to help that, but dang, my folks’ 10-inch 1950 Admiral was bigger than what they use for the review. I hope the quality is better but from the results one might wonder. Why not have an additional referee, one in a remote location, with a really big screen, review the call. He wouldn’t follow the game, only get to see the play he/she is called to review, to help isolate the review to just that one play. Obviously the review of, say, the scoop and score in the Penn State-the Ohio State game is going to be really important, although if Ohio State were already blowing out PSU, it may have been moot. Consider to that as it is now, the reviewing ref has to basically look his colleague in the eye and say, you flubbed that. A remote review would reduce that. </p><p></p><p>I’m sure there are reasons not to do a remote review but I don’t see it. A video review is a video review, regardless who does it or where.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1970 John, post: 1953894, member: 589602"] I’m wholly not the expert, but holding seems the greatest missed or phantom calls. There’s a lot going on down on the field for what’s really too few eyes to see it all, particularly down on the field. The video review is supposed to help that, but dang, my folks’ 10-inch 1950 Admiral was bigger than what they use for the review. I hope the quality is better but from the results one might wonder. Why not have an additional referee, one in a remote location, with a really big screen, review the call. He wouldn’t follow the game, only get to see the play he/she is called to review, to help isolate the review to just that one play. Obviously the review of, say, the scoop and score in the Penn State-the Ohio State game is going to be really important, although if Ohio State were already blowing out PSU, it may have been moot. Consider to that as it is now, the reviewing ref has to basically look his colleague in the eye and say, you flubbed that. A remote review would reduce that. I’m sure there are reasons not to do a remote review but I don’t see it. A video review is a video review, regardless who does it or where. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Sports
Illini Football
Wisconsin 25, Illinois 21 Postgame
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…