The Illinois AD Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#2,902      
- "Terrible decision looks and is terrible"

- "Our unprecedented move that not only will stunt our football program but also showed a total abdication of leadership and basic responsibility is actually our AD-hiring ace-in-the-hole"

One of these positions is certainly rainbows and ponies BS.


Your entire argument for the Cubit hire being terrible is presenting the best case scenario as a retrospective foregone conclusion.

We just signed the only class Cubit is likely to assemble here, and it really wasn't any worse than what Babers put together at his new job. I know we are all upset, but it's just not the scorched earth, end of the world scenario you are making it out to be.
 
#2,904      
That would be Illinois. Let Whitman go to Purdue and then listen to the same people going no big deal whine and cry when he turns out he knows what he is doing. I wold be fine with Whitman and am surprised it is not done yet. How many people are there that have actually run a P5 athletic department that are available that were not fired at their previous one? Guessing not many and a guy that has led two departments is more than qualified to move up and run our !!!! program. Should be done already.
 
#2,905      

Aaron

Chicago
No. Matt isn't right. He has an opinion and there is literally no way to know at this time whether or not kicking the can down the road with Cubit was a good decision or not in the long term.

How do you know Babers or any of our other would-be targets wanted to come to this dumpster fire not even knowing who their bosses would be? You don't. You gave zero idea. None. You guys act like we had Babers in the bag even after Thomas was fired which is complete ponies and rainbows BS. You guys are positing a best case scenario as fact.

If Cubit is a bad look, I can't imagine what would have happened if we moved on from Cubit and then missed on our top targets. Then what? Now THAT would be an "albatross around the neck of the new AD." Cubit isn't an albatross around anyone's neck. He's completely disposable. He knows it. The admin knows it. Everyone knows it except some message board posters and some sports writers that don't truly understand the situation. He won't even be around for next signing day, and had we signed Babers we'd have likely signed a very similar class as Cubit did regardless.

AD's don't want to inherit a coach who is disposable because he is low cost and low commitment, they want to inherit a coach who is disposable because the school is willing to pony up if it doesn't work out.

In other words: The big boy move was to hire the best we could--Babers, Brohm, whoever, put them on a respectable 1.5-2 million dollar contract and simply give the new AD the resources to pull the plug.

We handicapped our football program because we were not willing to risk paying a real buyout. You think that's attractive to potential candidates?
 
#2,906      

mattcoldagelli

The Transfer Portal with Do Not Contact Tag
Your entire argument for the Cubit hire being terrible is presenting the best case scenario as a retrospective foregone conclusion.

We just signed the only class Cubit is likely to assemble here, and it really wasn't any worse than what Babers put together at his new job. I know we are all upset, but it's just not the scorched earth, end of the world scenario you are making it out to be.

No, my argument is predicated on the fact that we made a terrible decision (offering Cubit the job when he plainly failed to earn it) and compounded it with another inexplicably terrible decision of a mini-contract. Either of those on their own would have been very bad. Doing them in tandem is literally unprecedented in major college football.

I'm glad that Dino Babers' class at Syracuse has managed to negate this for you to the point where you think it will actually make our situation more attractive to a potential AD. I'm also glad that you are in the extreme, extreme minority with that opinion, because it is crazy.
 
#2,907      
No. Matt isn't right. He has an opinion and there is literally no way to know at this time whether or not kicking the can down the road with Cubit was a good decision or not in the long term.

How do you know Babers or any of our other would-be targets wanted to come to this dumpster fire not even knowing who their bosses would be? You don't. You gave zero idea. None. You guys act like we had Babers in the bag even after Thomas was fired which is complete ponies and rainbows BS. You guys are positing a best case scenario as fact.

If Cubit is a bad look, I can't imagine what would have happened if we moved on from Cubit and then missed on our top targets. Then what? Now THAT would be an "albatross around the neck of the new AD." Cubit isn't an albatross around anyone's neck. He's completely disposable. He knows it. The admin knows it. Everyone knows it except some message board posters and some sports writers that don't truly understand the situation. He won't even be around for next signing day, and had we signed Babers we'd have likely signed a very similar class as Cubit did regardless.
It was mentioned on this forum long ago back in November and linked. Sturdy had several sources that stated Babers was interested in the UI gig...this is with an interim Chancellor and an I term AD.
 
#2,908      
That would be Illinois. Let Whitman go to Purdue and then listen to the same people going no big deal whine and cry when he turns out he knows what he is doing. I wold be fine with Whitman and am surprised it is not done yet. How many people are there that have actually run a P5 athletic department that are available that were not fired at their previous one? Guessing not many and a guy that has led two departments is more than qualified to move up and run our !!!! program. Should be done already.

Well, we let Jim Phillips get away and now he's regarded as one of the top 5 ADs in college sports. We let Rick George get away and he's on his way to being a top AD. We let Craig Tiley get away and now he may no longer be interested.

All three at one time would have killed for the AD job here - now they are on to bigger and better things. I fear that Whitman is next. I'm fine at this point just wrapping it up and hiring Whitman.
 
#2,910      
The articles read as if it's not really "mid next year." Burke is willing to stay until then or step aside earlier based on when they find someone and who it is.
 
#2,913      

Joel Goodson

ties will be resolved
Well, we let Jim Phillips get away and now he's regarded as one of the top 5 ADs in college sports. We let Rick George get away and he's on his way to being a top AD. We let Craig Tiley get away and now he may no longer be interested.

All three at one time would have killed for the AD job here - now they are on to bigger and better things. I fear that Whitman is next. I'm fine at this point just wrapping it up and hiring Whitman.

We did? When?

Let Phillips get away? He was never "ours" to let go.

Ditto with George.
 
#2,915      
AD's don't want to inherit a coach who is disposable because he is low cost and low commitment, they want to inherit a coach who is disposable because the school is willing to pony up if it doesn't work out.

In other words: The big boy move was to hire the best we could--Babers, Brohm, whoever, put them on a respectable 1.5-2 million dollar contract and simply give the new AD the resources to pull the plug.

We handicapped our football program because we were not willing to risk paying a real buyout. You think that's attractive to potential candidates?

I think it was terrible idea to hire Cubit. But, I think your resoning is the exact opposite of what they would feel. They would like to inherit a disposable coach.
 
#2,916      

Aaron

Chicago
I think it was terrible idea to hire Cubit. But, I think your resoning is the exact opposite of what they would feel. They would like to inherit a disposable coach.

And what would have made Babers, Brohm, Fleck, or whoever NOT disposable? Because we are afraid they might stink for two years and would have to be bought out for a few million bucks instead of Cubit's $250,000? That risk is simply part of playing to win at this level.

It was completely within the administration's power to both:

1. Give our program an actual chance at improvement by hiring someone else and giving them a respectable contract.

AND

2. Ensure prospective AD candidates would have the resources and permission to make a change.

Accomplishing both of these things was not mutually exclusive, out of reach, or even all that difficult.
 
#2,917      

Dan

Admin
I've heard from two candidates this week who are a bit confused, wondering if they're still on the radar or if they've fallen into the abyss without having been told..

One candidate said he was surprised to have been contacted a second time late this past week. He thought he might have been eliminated. Now he's been told they may wish to speak with him again. So he's not sure. Is he in or is he out?

http://herald-review.com/sports/tup...cle_5144c91f-5be7-5ec0-9468-ece7b5a916d5.html
 
Last edited:
#2,918      

icengineer

Southern Illinois
...both George and Tiley were taken off the board...

Per Dan's link, according to Tupper, Tiley is off the board...:tsk:
 
Last edited:
#2,919      

Deleted member 3875

D
Guest
Scalia or U of I AD, which gets filled 1st? Go.
 
#2,921      

hooraybeer

Pittsburgh, PA
what a disaster. everything related to the UofI and especially UoI athletics is just !!!! right now. there is no other way to put it. the only thing that has gone right in the past year was getting Dee back in the program. Starting with the Dudek injury, scandals everywhere, the football season, firing of TB, then MT, then the weird hiring of Cubit, DP dismissal, recruiting misses out the !!! that go on to have stellar seasons/careers elsewhere, all the basketball injuries leading to a wasted season, and now just a blown horrible unorganized AD search on top of the administrative problems at the school itself... why UofI? i get a sinking feeling anytime i think about anything illini related.

where's the tylenol?
 
Last edited:
#2,923      
We did? When?

Let Phillips get away? He was never "ours" to let go.

Ditto with George.

All three wanted the job at one point in time. Two expressed interest the last time it was open and those two also called it their dream job.
 
#2,925      
200.gif


200.gif


200.gif


200.gif


For the love of Mike, What a Charlie Foxtrot this is at every, single, turn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.