I probably should have used a hypothetical. What if that team had lost Gill or Bardo for the year before the season started. And one of Hamilton or Battle had ended up playing 100 minutes on a gimpy leg and then been shut down and the other played 8 games and then was lost for the year. And say Ervin Small had gotten blind drunk before the season and taken a bat to Lou's ride or something and been tossed off the team. And Henson had to play the season with Nick, Gill or Bardo, Smith, Kaufmann and Liberty (who I realize were both freshmen), Bowman etc. Might have done okay now with that team but back when players stayed 3 or 4 years on every team, they wouldn't have been very good.
Or just take any team from the past or present and take away the starting point guard before the season started, have the two bigs play hardly at all, have your 2nd best starter miss 8 games, the best incoming freshman not be able to practice and be in doubt right up to the start of the season. No team is going to look very good, regardless of the quality of those players, they're all essential parts of the team. No coach is going to look very good trying to scramble around playing freshmen who aren't ready for major minutes yet, back ups and walk-ons. Maybe Kentucky last year or UCLA back in the day, but not many others.