Bracketology

Status
Not open for further replies.
#126      
That same person also had this to say about Northwestern's chances:

Upcoming:

@Michigan St
Minnesota
@Nebraska
@Rutgers
Iowa
@Ohio St
Nebraska

A brutal stretch in that no win represents a signature win, but road games are so difficult to win. If they can get out of this 6-2 (or even 5-3), there's signature win chances everywhere in February.

They can get there, folks.
 
#128      
According to ESPN.. we are 26 in RPI, #5 SOS, 2-3 vs. top 50 (0-2 vs. top 25). Season ain't over folks!
 
#137      
It's .25 * (your winning %) + .50 * (your opponents winning %) + .25 * (your opponent's opponents winning %).

Road wins are worth 1.4, home wins .6.

We did a nice job of scheduling, so our SOS is #10 right now.

Does weighting of wins and losses home and away only apply to your WP not the OWP or OOWP?
 
#140      
Bracket Matrix just updated today. Illinois in 17 of the 40 brackets...average of 10.35. Road Trip to Dayton anyone!?!?
 
#144      
Wouldn't that be something if Northwestern played Illinois in the 1st Four? Actually, I don't know what that would be.
 
#145      
Wouldn't that be something if Northwestern played Illinois in the 1st Four? Actually, I don't know what that would be.

I believe that the committee would work it so Illinois played Rhode Island and Northwestern played VCU to avoid pitting teams against each other that played in the regular season. I don't know if it's explicitly written in the rules, but I know the committee tries to avoid it.
 
#146      
Wouldn't that be something if Northwestern played Illinois in the 1st Four? Actually, I don't know what that would be.

I don't know that they want two B1G teams playing each other in the first four.
 
#150      
Here is a challenge for you guys: if 20 wins is a lock/magic# for the tournament committee (fair presumption) where do the next 9 wins come from? For the life of me, I do not see them on the remaining schedule and you all know what that means.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back