This post is not going to be popular opinion. I've gone back and forth and I've come back to thinking Groce gets one more year. My reasoning is roster balance. We are set to return only 7 scholarship players next year, and the 4(+?) recruits. General consensus on the board is we keep Pickett and DMW no matter what. Frazier and Tilmon are question marks. If Groce is fired and we lose both of them our roster stands to have 9 scholarship players. That's also not even counting potential transfers if Groce is let go, or just because guys want a change of scenery. While a new coach would hopefully be able to come in and grab a couple guys, he'd have a bunch of holes to fill and wouldn't even have a full complement of scholarship players, or he'd be in the place of taking fringe recruits like Tate who bust their !!! for our Illini but are limited.
However, if Groce is fired after next year, there would be more scholarship players. Guys from this year's sophomore class who might be likely to transfer if Groce is fired this year, would be going into their senior year and probably more inclined to stay than sit out a year. A guy like Tilmon might go pro, but if he needs another year it's in his best interest to stay and play one more year as opposed to transfer and sit. The new coach would have a fuller roster and would have a year to recruit to those 4-6 new openings from this current sophomore class, as opposed to having to fill them immediately upon his hire.
I know people have argued to keep Groce for the quality of his class. My argument is based on quantity. I think it's just asking too much for a guy coming in to have to fill that many spots when he could have a fuller roster and only have to fill a couple after next year. With the potential roster hits of Groce being fired after this year, I think it sets us back less if we wait till after next year, even if we have to go through another season of crap. Or maybe in that extra season Groce saves himself.
I'm sure there's a good counterargument out there, so I'm interested in what you guys have to say.
The counterarguement is this year. Look what Groce has done with a senior-heavy team. The team plays poor defense for extended stretches. The team has no identity. The team doesn't seem like they play together. The team is soft. There are no injuries up to this point and what do we have to show for it? A 13-9 record and no marquee victories on our resume. Yes, we have VCU, BYU, NC State in the non-conference. None are marquee wins but all these teams may be bubble teams. In conference, we've beaten 2 other bubble teams and one young team in Iowa. No marquee wins on this schedule. This is a microcosm of John Groce's tenure. Besides for beating #1 Indiana, he hasn't had many other upset wins against highly ranked teams.
So, what do you think happens next year? Maybe the freshman are talented but they are still freshman. So, if this team can't play defense, what makes you think next year's will? Next year's team won't have Malcolm Hill to bail them out. Their top returning players will be Leron Black, Michael Finke, and JCL, none of which have shown the ability to be leaders either vocally or by example. They all have their deficiencies(Leron fouls a lot, Finke is deficient on defense, and JCL is also deficient on defense along with being too 1-dimensional).
Next year will be the exact same thing. Mediocre play, poor defense, lack of consistency, and lack of proper coaching to fix these mistakes.