3/17 Games

Status
Not open for further replies.
#26      
KrushCow31
Wow. Refs really blew that Seton Hall game. Feel bad for those kids. Totally ruined a competitive game.
 
#28      
Illini_1979
ski300 said:
Agreed. That flagrant foul call was complete crap. It effectively ended the game. What a horrible decision.
Click to expand...

Disagree. The foul was unquestionably a push in the back which was exactly the definition of a Flagrant 1 they put up on the screen. The rules don't make any allowance for the time of the game when it occurs.
 
#29      
KrushCow31
Illini_1979 said:
Disagree. The foul was unquestionably a push in the back which was exactly the definition of a Flagrant 1 they put up on the screen. The rules don't make any allowance for the time of the game when it occurs.
Click to expand...

No the foul was a hit to the back and then he accidentally tripped him. If the trip had been intentional then I would agree. If there was a push, it was minimal.
 
#30      
Adnarel
Well, I think it was crap because I picked Seton Hall in 2 of my 3 brackets.
 
#31      
illiniknight
Illini_1979 said:
Disagree. The foul was unquestionably a push in the back which was exactly the definition of a Flagrant 1 they put up on the screen. The rules don't make any allowance for the time of the game when it occurs.
Click to expand...

Disagree. It is a common end of the game foul. The fact that the Arkansas player tripped over his own feet made it appear worse. I can kind of see it if then didn't have replay but with the video review they make that call? I know technically there was "no play on the ball" but how many times have you seen players just wrap guys up to get the foul call at the end or put two hands on a guy just like the guy from Seton Hall. There was nothing excessive done on that play.
 
#33      
Illini_1979
ski300 said:
Disagree. It is a common end of the game foul. The fact that the Arkansas player tripped over his own feet made it appear worse. I can kind of see it if then didn't have replay but with the video review they make that call? I know technically there was "no play on the ball" but how many times have you seen players just wrap guys up to get the foul call at the end or put two hands on a guy just like the guy from Seton Hall. There was nothing excessive done on that play.
Click to expand...

KrushCow31 said:
No the foul was a hit to the back and then he accidentally tripped him. If the trip had been intentional then I would agree. If there was a push, it was minimal.
Click to expand...

I don't think that the trip had anything to do with the call. The SH player pushed the Arkansas player in the back without trying to go for the ball. That's a Flagrant 1.

If he had just grabbed him then that's a different story and not a Flagrant 1.

Sorry that everyone's bracket is busted.
 
#34      
TCTORNADO
Michigan with only 4 TO's all game and 19 assists on 29 FG's is very, very good.
16-29 from 3pt is not bad either.
 
#35      
illiniknight
Illini_1979 said:
I don't think that the trip had anything to do with the call. The SH player pushed the Arkansas player in the back without trying to go for the ball. That's a Flagrant 1.

If he had just grabbed him then that's a different story and not a Flagrant 1.

Sorry that everyone's bracket is busted.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't think it was much of a push. I do think it is a play that is usually called a common foul. Oh well, we should agree to disagree and enjoy the rest of the game.s
 
#37      
illinois_hustle
This SMU team is how I want our teams to play. Any coach that delivers that movement and passing and effort and team IQ is fine with me.
 
#38      
kaptain80
Only two upsets so far (based on seed numbering only) and they're both Big Ten teams. Come on, guys, making it harder to rag on the ACC...
 
#39      
disaacso
:doh: smu taking 3 timeouts home. Probably could have used one of those
 
#40      
Serious Late
I can't fathom why there wasn't a timeout by SMU with 10 seconds on the clock and the ball in the front court. They had THREE timeouts!
 
#41      
FiveStar
GoIllini40 said:
Jankovich, no thanks
Click to expand...

Yeah. 3 timeouts. If it's not smooth in transition I think you gotta take one. Their spacing was all messed up. I'm sure they practice that situation everyday, but I think he's gotta recognize it's not in rhythm.
 
#42      
Deleted member 11241
Serious Late said:
I can't fathom why there wasn't a timeout by SMU with 10 seconds on the clock and the ball in the front court. They had THREE timeouts!
Click to expand...

How can you not call a timeout there and try to draw up a play. Unreal.
 
#46      
illinois_hustle
Serious Late said:
I can't fathom why there wasn't a timeout by SMU with 10 seconds on the clock and the ball in the front court. They had THREE timeouts!
Click to expand...

Yep. Jank could've definitely drawn something better up, especially since they were so tired and lost against the zone.
 
#50      
Bailey
Somebody please tell me we didn't cool on Shamet. That's my memory being fuzzy, right? Please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back