If you read Tigerboard, yes. I actually just read the exact same thing on Tigerboard and was the main motivation for my post.
I'll bite.
First, I agree with the poster that said fanbases always think their prospective recruits fit their coach's style. However, there are some easy things to look at for Underwood vs Cuonzo.
First is pace of play. Here it is easy to see that Underwood's style fits anyone who likes to get up and down the court. Cuonzo's style is much slower and methodical. There is no way to contradict this statiscally and not only is it a faster pace but it is more efficient.
Second, is how the post is used. Underwood, when not running in full-court, will use his center starting at the high post and cutting or posting after traffic has cleared. This requires a multi-skilled big man who can shoot, pass and is athletic enough to make a hard cut and seal. Cuonzo will play big men in more of a traditional get into the post and stay down low. This was a problem for Tilmon in HS as his guards could not get him the ball on the block and then he was doubled too frequently when they did. It will be very difficult to cover Tilmon's athleticism in Underwood's offense and almost impossible to double without leaving wide open perimeter shooters.
I personally feel Maverick Morgan's skill set fits Cuonzo's scheme more. However, guys like Tilmon and Finke should fit a five for Underwood much better.