I agree with everything in the first part. I don't get the weird hate for Brohm. He is set to have better teams/seasons in his first 2 years on the job than any Illinois coach has accomplished since the Rose Bowl year. I'd say there's a much better chance of him building a perennially good team at Purdue than Lovie building one at Illinois, and I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise with any legitimate data or evidence.
In the end, for Brohm to have perennial success, he needs to fill the rosters with young players that develop and build a culture. From my understanding, that’s not what is happening at Purdue. But, based on the first two years, I wouldn’t argue that he won’t be successful. I would argue that he will leave Purdue and take a better job and the team will lose the graduate transfer pipeline.