Goode had a monster game over the weekend.
Yep, off to a good start as a candidate for Mr BB of Indiana.
Goode had a monster game over the weekend.
My only issue with using the transfer market is we have yet to prove we can consistently land impact players. So far Feliz is the only one even though we have been after several each year. Texas Tech and Baylor have shown it can work, but that doesn’t mean it will. When you miss on your top targets, it’s another option that you still have. I’m just skeptical it will be the great equalizer that at least a few believe it will be. I’ll keep my fingers crossed. We should know by late July.
For those who say the transfer market hasn't been good to us in the past... Is that a surprise? We weren't good. Transfers are typically looking for a team they can have an immediate impact on and see success. We're just now becoming an attractive destination for the transfer market. It's important to consider priorities that we were after that went elsewhere. T.J Holyfield at Texas Tech comes to mind. I think this staff will figure it out.
And there were a lot of people on here who were negative about taking a JUCO PG out of Northwest Florida State. Still negative Nancy's after Feliz' first year at UI. But man, did they ever get on the band wagon after last year.
This whole idea that we shouldn’t recruit transfers because it hasn’t worked consistently for us is baffling to me. This is like saying “My only issue with recruiting 5* guys out of Chicago is we have yet to prove we can consistently land them. So far Dosunmu is the only one even though we’ve been after several each year. Duke, Kentucky, Michigan State have shown it can work, but that doesn’t mean it will for us.”My only issue with using the transfer market is we have yet to prove we can consistently land impact players. So far Feliz is the only one even though we have been after several each year. Texas Tech and Baylor have shown it can work, but that doesn’t mean it will. When you miss on your top targets, it’s another option that you still have. I’m just skeptical it will be the great equalizer that at least a few believe it will be. I’ll keep my fingers crossed. We should know by late July.
Not gonna try and translate for someone else, just speak for myself. I am all for landing impact transfers. I am not going to get too optimistic it will happen, or that we will land the type of transfer that will make up for our inability to land our top HS priorities this recruiting cycle. I'm hopeful, but skeptical, and I assume that's where a lot of other people are coming at this from.This whole idea that we shouldn’t recruit transfers because it hasn’t worked consistently for us is baffling to me. This is like saying “My only issue with recruiting 5* guys out of Chicago is we have yet to prove we can consistently land them. So far Dosunmu is the only one even though we’ve been after several each year. Duke, Kentucky, Michigan State have shown it can work, but that doesn’t mean it will for us.”
So is the staff just supposed to recruit 4* and 3* high school guys because that’s what Illinois has been consistently good at landing?
My only point is that is has not proven to be reliable yet so depending on it to cover misses is not likely to be successful. I am also not saying that’s what the staff is doing. Some on this board are saying that the misses don’t matter because we can fill the spots with transfers. My comment is directed to them which may or may not include you. You are free to disagree.This whole idea that we shouldn’t recruit transfers because it hasn’t worked consistently for us is baffling to me. This is like saying “My only issue with recruiting 5* guys out of Chicago is we have yet to prove we can consistently land them. So far Dosunmu is the only one even though we’ve been after several each year. Duke, Kentucky, Michigan State have shown it can work, but that doesn’t mean it will for us.”
So is the staff just supposed to recruit 4* and 3* high school guys because that’s what Illinois has been consistently good at landing?
For those who say the transfer market hasn't been good to us in the past... Is that a surprise? We weren't good. Transfers are typically looking for a team they can have an immediate impact on and see success. We're just now becoming an attractive destination for the transfer market. It's important to consider priorities that we were after that went elsewhere. T.J Holyfield at Texas Tech comes to mind. I think this staff will figure it out.
I agree that the misses matter and that it hasn’t proven to be reliable yet. I just don’t see a lot of other options in recruiting this year. Like I said, I think this team has guys that can be scorers or “the guys” so I don’t think we need that type of player from the transfer market. Just guys to fill the gaps with defense/rebounding you would have if Kofi leaves. If you can find guys on the transfer market to replace scoring, great but I think that’s less likely. This team won’t need a transfer to be what Rayvonte Rice was for that team though. I also don’t think the transfer market is something you should bank on every year going forward either.My only point is that is has not proven to be reliable yet so depending on it to cover misses is not likely to be successful. I am also not saying that’s what the staff is doing. Some on this board are saying that the misses don’t matter because we can fill the spots with transfers. My comment is directed to them which may or may not include you. You are free to disagree.
Kenny Battle, Jeff (I think) Dawson, and Rayvonte Rice were transfers too, right? I think it can help for a year here and there but isn’t something you can count on year after year.I think we've been through this debate at length. Seems that we concluded we've periodically (albeit infrequently) found some talent via the transfer route:
1. Ken Norman
2. Marcus Griffin
3. Andres Feliz
4. Derek Holcomb
Considering we're still a Top 15 program overall (in the history of NCAA basketball) and have the ability to attract top talent, you'd have to conclude that we've not really been productive with transfers.
Shelly Clark baby! Is 1993going too far back?I think we've been through this debate at length. Seems that we concluded we've periodically (albeit infrequently) found some talent via the transfer route:
1. Ken Norman
2. Marcus Griffin
3. Andres Feliz
4. Derek Holcomb
Considering we're still a Top 15 program overall (in the history of NCAA basketball) and have the ability to attract top talent, you'd have to conclude that we've not really been productive with transfers.
Kenny Battle anyone?Shelly Clark baby! Is 1993going too far back?
Kenny Battle wasn’t exactly bad.I think we've been through this debate at length. Seems that we concluded we've periodically (albeit infrequently) found some talent via the transfer route:
1. Ken Norman
2. Marcus Griffin
3. Andres Feliz
4. Derek Holcomb
Considering we're still a Top 15 program overall (in the history of NCAA basketball) and have the ability to attract top talent, you'd have to conclude that we've not really been productive with transfers.
So did we have any recruits call Underwood late last night to commit on the spot? That's how this works, right?
Tell me more......Maybe, although it is the de-commitment first from an earlier prospect that changed their mind, they are still just kids ......
I saw that 24/7 is reporting Illini are in Reggie Bass’ final four. Anyone have a scouting report on this 2022, 6-5 SG? Is he a priority? Looks like he is a high 3*, but might be on the rise.
Maybe, although it is the de-commitment first from an earlier prospect that changed their mind, they are still just kids ......
Along with Battle, Rice were Jack Ingram, who was crucial in the AZ game In 05. IIRC, Norman came off the bench in one game as a unknown and lit it up. I believe Heldman was also a transfer. Griffin was a transfer after playing JC ball for a year. We have had moderate success overall in the transfer market. But we did have bad transfers during the Weber years after 06. Groce had a few also. BU has one bad transfer on record, Alstork, but Feliz was a hit, and De La Rosa was marginal at best Then of course, we have Tyler Underwood who was a hit . LOL. I think if we can bring one solid transfer a year, we will be ok.Kenny Battle, Jeff (I think) Dawson, and Rayvonte Rice were transfers too, right? I think it can help for a year here and there but isn’t something you can count on year after year.
Heldman was a recruit out of high school as I remember.Along with Battle, Rice were Jack Ingram, who was crucial in the AZ game In 05. IIRC, Norman came off the bench in one game as a unknown and lit it up. I believe Heldman was also a transfer. Griffin was a transfer after playing JC ball for a year. We have had moderate success overall in the transfer market. But we did have bad transfers during the Weber years after 06. Groce had a few also. BU has one bad transfer on record, Alstork, but Feliz was a hit, and De La Rosa was marginal at best Then of course, we have Tyler Underwood who was a hit . LOL. I think if we can bring one solid transfer a year, we will be ok.
D.J. Steward?So did we have any recruits call Underwood late last night to commit on the spot? That's how this works, right?