Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#276      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
I post this gif with the utmost solemnity.

Music Video 80S GIF
 
#277      
Disagree. ZZ's commitment was a knee jerk deal. Upon further review, he's decided to go through the process and figure out what's best for him. That's commendable.

As for us, I expect we're fine with it. Lots of time left for the '24s. I agree that there are no guarantees we'd take ZZ back.
I really don't follow the bb commitment process but I was surprised that ZZ jumped on board that quickly.
All the best to him. Not in the B1G
 
#278      
I really don't follow the bb commitment process but I was surprised that ZZ jumped on board that quickly.
All the best to him. Not in the B1G
You were?

When you look at our recruiting and then see a guy that was not even in the top 150, it made a ton of sense from ZZ's perspective.

I have been on record as saying ZZ looks more like a top 75 to me not a guy currently 147 on Rivals and 155 on 247. That said, there were two caveats, I have never seen him take an outside shot on a highlight clip, and most of his clips, while impressive, are from training and not in actual games. So given that, I'm going to assume the ranking services have good reason to rank him substantially lower than 75.

Reading through the thread, it's real simple as to why he's decommitting. He's not good enough and the staff wants his scholarship to use on someone else. It happens. ZZ has plenty of time to improve his stock and will still end up at a good school. It doesn't do him any good either to go to a school and sit on the bench just because his brother plays(ed) there.
 
#279      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
It's pretty clear that Daddy Brad and Co. aren't pulling punches with these kids. It's also pretty clear that he isn't standing pat. They've also proven that the Portal is going to be very much in play every year if it makes the team better. If you aren't into competing for your PT....move along.

Bert and Co. same philosophy it looks like. The best players gonna play. Zero punches pulled. Straight shooters.
 
#281      

Central IL Illini

Springfield, IL
Plus, ZZ is not reclassing and Skyy is gonna be gone.
Is this due to him being one and done regardless, or is there an expectation he will get drafted? I am not that clued into the draft scene, but I haven't seen his name in any of the mock drafts I have come across
 
#283      
It's pretty clear that Daddy Brad and Co. aren't pulling punches with these kids. It's also pretty clear that he isn't standing pat. They've also proven that the Portal is going to be very much in play every year if it makes the team better. If you aren't into competing for your PT....move along.

Bert and Co. same philosophy it looks like. The best players gonna play. Zero punches pulled. Straight shooters.
I prefer my shooters to have a little arc on their shots but agree to disagree.../s I'll see myself out
 
#287      
You were?

When you look at our recruiting and then see a guy that was not even in the top 150, it made a ton of sense from ZZ's perspective.

I have been on record as saying ZZ looks more like a top 75 to me not a guy currently 147 on Rivals and 155 on 247. That said, there were two caveats, I have never seen him take an outside shot on a highlight clip, and most of his clips, while impressive, are from training and not in actual games. So given that, I'm going to assume the ranking services have good reason to rank him substantially lower than 75.

Reading through the thread, it's real simple as to why he's decommitting. He's not good enough and the staff wants his scholarship to use on someone else. It happens. ZZ has plenty of time to improve his stock and will still end up at a good school. It doesn't do him any good either to go to a school and sit on the bench just because his brother plays(ed) there.
I was.
 
#288      
Remember when people were worried when Reggie Bass and AJ Storr decommitted, Jeremy Fears committed to MSU, Kylan Boswell committed to AZ

We ended up with Jayden Epps, Sencire Harris and Skyy Clark along with DRG for 2023

This coaching staff is unbelievable!

1666129017913.png
1666129244636.png
1666129281699.png
1666129312917.png
 
#290      
People seem to think it's very important to establish the "We didn't want him anyway." line of reasoning with ZZ.

This comes after tons of ink in the last few months suggesting that he is rising in the rankings. Obviously, we'll see. Offers will precede rankings probably and give us a pretty good idea.

I think his primary reason for coming here was to suit up with his brother. Good chance that he's gotten the vibes that either his brother will go a year earlier or that ZZ won't be able to reclassify or that it's not advisable. Once that happened, why not open your recruitment? The initial reason for the commitment is no longer there. Time to take a fresh look.

Best of luck ZZ.
 
#291      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
People seem to think it's very important to establish the "We didn't want him anyway." line of reasoning with ZZ.

This comes after tons of ink in the last few months suggesting that he is rising in the rankings. Obviously, we'll see. Offers will precede rankings probably and give us a pretty good idea.

I think his primary reason for coming here was to suit up with his brother. Good chance that he's gotten the vibes that either his brother will go a year earlier or that ZZ won't be able to reclassify or that it's not advisable. Once that happened, why not open your recruitment? The initial reason for the commitment is no longer there. Time to take a fresh look.

Best of luck ZZ.

This. Occam's Razor, right? The impetus is gone, so why not start anew?
 
#292      
People seem to think it's very important to establish the "We didn't want him anyway." line of reasoning with ZZ.

This comes after tons of ink in the last few months suggesting that he is rising in the rankings. Obviously, we'll see. Offers will precede rankings probably and give us a pretty good idea.

I think his primary reason for coming here was to suit up with his brother. Good chance that he's gotten the vibes that either his brother will go a year earlier or that ZZ won't be able to reclassify or that it's not advisable. Once that happened, why not open your recruitment? The initial reason for the commitment is no longer there. Time to take a fresh look.

Best of luck ZZ.
I don't think that is it at all.

People are trying to determine did we nudge him towards the door because we have better prospects on the line and need the ride, or did he just say I have better offers elsewhere. There is a big difference between the two. A big difference between the perceptions of your team on the market.

The thing is, it's not always that easy. The fact that this happened fairly shortly after the DGL commitment would make me think he was questioning his chances of seeing the court early and didn't like them, so he decided to go elsewhere and the staff said that's cool, we can use your scholarship anyway.
 
#293      
I don't think that is it at all.

People are trying to determine did we nudge him towards the door because we have better prospects on the line and need the ride, or did he just say I have better offers elsewhere. There is a big difference between the two. A big difference between the perceptions of your team on the market.

The thing is, it's not always that easy. The fact that this happened fairly shortly after the DGL commitment would make me think he was questioning his chances of seeing the court early and didn't like them, so he decided to go elsewhere and the staff said that's cool, we can use your scholarship anyway.
Here's what you said. "He's not good enough and the staff wants his scholarship to use on someone else. " which to mean is equivalent to "We didn't want him." It certainly isn't equivalent to "I committed awfully early but now I'd like to look around.."

And neither makes a hill of beans difference about "perception on the market." "ZZ Clark didn't want to play for those guys", if true, won't move a recruiting needle anywhere in America.
 
#294      
best of luck to ZZ. . (unless he goes to another Big Ten school of course ):sneaky:

with the way we've been recruiting lately, I am not even remotely worried.
 
#295      
We seem to be operating under the assumption ZZ is decommitting and will end up at the college level…..maybe he is decommitting because with his pathway for development he doesn’t plan to go to college at all.
 
#296      
Is anyone actually worried? Feels like for the first time I can remember on a decommit this board is pretty much in agreement.

Season 4 Love GIF by The Good Place
You could see the commit, see the change in the crystal ball, measure it's percentage, see the colors change but in the end he returns back to the rivals top 150 list and eventually to his home.... None of this is bad
 
#297      
Here's what you said. "He's not good enough and the staff wants his scholarship to use on someone else. " which to mean is equivalent to "We didn't want him." It certainly isn't equivalent to "I committed awfully early but now I'd like to look around.."

And neither makes a hill of beans difference about "perception on the market." "ZZ Clark didn't want to play for those guys", if true, won't move a recruiting needle anywhere in America.
Those are not the same thing. We didn't want him, is quite frankly a stupid comment, because clearly if a guy committed to us, we did want him at the time. He's not good enough means just that. Things change, rosters change, potential future recruits change.

I was thinking there was some pressure to take ZZ because of Skyy. We said Skyy is worth it, deal. However, if you haven't noticed, our recruiting is going very well. We've got great recruits on campus all the time, guys better than ZZ. Now, if there was any pressure because of Skyy, you're thinking, we could really use that scholarship on Trey McKenney or Melvin Bell, etc. Plus when you see people say TA keeps it real, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that basically means ZZ was told playing time is likely to be scarce.

The perception is the fans perception. The reason fans would want to say we didn't want him anyway is because if we initiated the decommitment, it would lead you to believe things are going so great we're telling quality players we need your scholarship for someone better. On the other hand, if the player just wants to go somewhere else, it leads you to believe things aren't going as great because players that wanted to come in the past no longer see you as their best place.

But guys decommitting absolutely can affect your perception to other recruits. Highly unlikely in this specific scenario, but if Ayo had decommitted, I assure you our resurgence would have been much more difficult, beyond just losing a great player. It hurts your brand with other players, because they assume something must be wrong or he wouldn't have decommitted, especially during a rebuild.

Again, this is not anything terribly controversial.
 
#298      

Illini in OC

In. The. Alley.
Those are not the same thing. We didn't want him, is quite frankly a stupid comment, because clearly if a guy committed to us, we did want him at the time. He's not good enough means just that. Things change, rosters change, potential future recruits change.

I was thinking there was some pressure to take ZZ because of Skyy. We said Skyy is worth it, deal. However, if you haven't noticed, our recruiting is going very well. We've got great recruits on campus all the time, guys better than ZZ. Now, if there was any pressure because of Skyy, you're thinking, we could really use that scholarship on Trey McKenney or Melvin Bell, etc. Plus when you see people say TA keeps it real, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that basically means ZZ was told playing time is likely to be scarce.

The perception is the fans perception. The reason fans would want to say we didn't want him anyway is because if we initiated the decommitment, it would lead you to believe things are going so great we're telling quality players we need your scholarship for someone better. On the other hand, if the player just wants to go somewhere else, it leads you to believe things aren't going as great because players that wanted to come in the past no longer see you as their best place.

But guys decommitting absolutely can affect your perception to other recruits. Highly unlikely in this specific scenario, but if Ayo had decommitted, I assure you our resurgence would have been much more difficult, beyond just losing a great player. It hurts your brand with other players, because they assume something must be wrong or he wouldn't have decommitted, especially during a rebuild.

Again, this is not anything terribly controversial.
I think we should just thank ZZ and wish him the best .... and keep our mouths shut beyond that.

Speculating, either positive or negative, with respect to either ZZ or the Illini is still only speculation (my tautology for the day :)) that may unnecessarily offend the Clark family or demonstrate what a ham-handed fan base we are to other recruits.

I trust BU and staff 100% to make the best of the situation no matter what the underlying circumstances may be.
 
#299      
Those are not the same thing. We didn't want him, is quite frankly a stupid comment, because clearly if a guy committed to us, we did want him at the time. He's not good enough means just that. Things change, rosters change, potential future recruits change.

I was thinking there was some pressure to take ZZ because of Skyy. We said Skyy is worth it, deal. However, if you haven't noticed, our recruiting is going very well. We've got great recruits on campus all the time, guys better than ZZ. Now, if there was any pressure because of Skyy, you're thinking, we could really use that scholarship on Trey McKenney or Melvin Bell, etc. Plus when you see people say TA keeps it real, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that basically means ZZ was told playing time is likely to be scarce.

The perception is the fans perception. The reason fans would want to say we didn't want him anyway is because if we initiated the decommitment, it would lead you to believe things are going so great we're telling quality players we need your scholarship for someone better. On the other hand, if the player just wants to go somewhere else, it leads you to believe things aren't going as great because players that wanted to come in the past no longer see you as their best place.

But guys decommitting absolutely can affect your perception to other recruits. Highly unlikely in this specific scenario, but if Ayo had decommitted, I assure you our resurgence would have been much more difficult, beyond just losing a great player. It hurts your brand with other players, because they assume something must be wrong or he wouldn't have decommitted, especially during a rebuild.

Again, this is not anything terribly controversial.
LOL.

Okay, we'll use your language. Why are people so invested in demonstrating that this decommit is a result of him being "not good enough."?

No recruit is on this message board looking for clues about why other recruits are coming or decommitting etc. They have far better sources for such information than anonymous posters on message boards.

To the extent they come to boards, the only thing they get is confirmation, good or bad, about the passion of the fan base and how they treat players. People who feel the need to dis the brother of our starting point guard to make themselves feel better about a decommitment are saying a lot about their own insecurities.

Best of luck ZZ.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.