Michigan 19, Illinois 17 Postgame

#301      

Captain 14

The Last Best Place
For anyone who doesn't think this was offensive pass interference (I've encountered some non-Illini fans who don't think so, think it was questionably close, or aren't sure), the following is from the 2022 NCAA Football Rulebook. I had to look up the definition of "neutral zone" and it is two parallel lines extending to the sideline, one from the pre-snap nose of the football and the other from the pre-snap tail of the football (on this play it's the 45 yard line stripe):

b. Offensive pass interference is contact by a Team A player beyond the neutral zone that interferes with a Team B player during a legal forward pass play in which the forward pass crosses the neutral zone. It is the responsibility of the offensive player to avoid the opponents. It is not offensive pass interference (A.R. 7-3-8-IV, V, X, XV and XVI):
1. When, after the snap, a Team A ineligible player immediately charges and contacts an opponent at a point not more than one yard beyond the neutral zone and maintains the contact for no more than three yards beyond the neutral zone. (A.R. 7-3-10-II) RULE 7 / SNAPPING AND PASSING THE BALL FR-83
2. When two or more eligible players are making a simultaneous and bona fide attempt to reach, catch or bat the pass. Eligible players of either team have equal rights to the ball (A.R. 7-3-8-IX).
3. When the pass is in flight and two or more eligible players are in the area where they might receive or intercept the pass and an offensive player in that area impedes an opponent, and the pass is not catchable.
No wonder the refs are confused
 
#302      
For anyone who doesn't think this was offensive pass interference (I've encountered some non-Illini fans who don't think so, think it was questionably close, or aren't sure), the following is from the 2022 NCAA Football Rulebook. I had to look up the definition of "neutral zone" and it is two parallel lines extending to the sideline, one from the pre-snap nose of the football and the other from the pre-snap tail of the football (on this play it's the 45 yard line stripe):

b. Offensive pass interference is contact by a Team A player beyond the neutral zone that interferes with a Team B player during a legal forward pass play in which the forward pass crosses the neutral zone. It is the responsibility of the offensive player to avoid the opponents. It is not offensive pass interference (A.R. 7-3-8-IV, V, X, XV and XVI):
1. When, after the snap, a Team A ineligible player immediately charges and contacts an opponent at a point not more than one yard beyond the neutral zone and maintains the contact for no more than three yards beyond the neutral zone. (A.R. 7-3-10-II) RULE 7 / SNAPPING AND PASSING THE BALL FR-83
2. When two or more eligible players are making a simultaneous and bona fide attempt to reach, catch or bat the pass. Eligible players of either team have equal rights to the ball (A.R. 7-3-8-IX).
3. When the pass is in flight and two or more eligible players are in the area where they might receive or intercept the pass and an offensive player in that area impedes an opponent, and the pass is not catchable.
The refs were told a pick play was coming well before the play happened…..
 
#303      
BB said in his presser today that he didn't submit any video of any plays to the league this week. Said he's pretty much done with it which I interpret as he's tired of submitting video and the league just ignoring him or admitting they messed up time after time
 
#304      
The refs were told a pick play was coming well before the play happened…..

Like WE told them “hey be ready to throw the flag, they’re gonna try a pick play at some point”?

Or MICH said “hey we’re gonna do an illegal pick play if we get in a tough spot and need a few yards, don’t call it”?

Because if it’s the former, damn these officials suck. If it’s the latter, that’s a whole different can of worms that I was hoping wasn’t completely true.

Unconscious biases or intense pressure leading to missed calls I expect, but full on corruption to manipulate the fairness of the game is something I only complained about but never thought was true. ☹️
 
#305      

redwingillini11

White and Sixth
North Aurora
BB said in his presser today that he didn't submit any video of any plays to the league this week. Said he's pretty much done with it which I interpret as he's tired of submitting video and the league just ignoring him or admitting they messed up time after time
If so, I hope Josh Whitman is going hard after the league office. I understand Coach's frustration and the fact that he's saying what's the point. But if we do nothing still nothing will happen. The next step is Whitman walking into the office / meetings and demanding enough is enough. I'm sure there are other programs that are just as disgruntled.
 
#306      
If so, I hope Josh Whitman is going hard after the league office. I understand Coach's frustration and the fact that he's saying what's the point. But if we do nothing still nothing will happen. The next step is Whitman walking into the office / meetings and demanding enough is enough. I'm sure there are other programs that are just as disgruntled.
Roughly 12 of 14.
 
#307      
Like WE told them “hey be ready to throw the flag, they’re gonna try a pick play at some point”?

Or MICH said “hey we’re gonna do an illegal pick play if we get in a tough spot and need a few yards, don’t call it”?

Because if it’s the former, damn these officials suck. If it’s the latter, that’s a whole different can of worms that I was hoping wasn’t completely true.

Unconscious biases or intense pressure leading to missed calls I expect, but full on corruption to manipulate the fairness of the game is something I only complained about but never thought was true. ☹️
The former. We gave them a heads up before the play. The officials know tendencies too. They watch film of the teams they are officiating.
 
#311      

Retro62

North Bethesda, Maryland
Imagine if we beat UM and then they beat OSU…that could potentially knock the BIG out of the CFP…it’s just too much for the BIG to risk losing. Honestly, a one loss BIG would probably be in, but can you chance it?
 
#313      
Question then is WHY wasn't a flag thrown ???
And there is your proof of the league full on determining outcomes. There is no other explanation that I will accept. It's been a known issue forever, and it will ultimately be the downfall of the league if it is not addressed. Why watch the games if the outcome is already determined? Just another WWE Raw every Saturday (basketball at times as well).
 
#314      
It's been a known issue forever, and it will ultimately be the downfall of the league if it is not addressed. Why watch the games if the outcome is already determined? Just another WWE Raw every Saturday (basketball at times as well).
That’s where I stand, with zero interest in watching or supporting predetermined “competition”. I’d rather spend my fall Saturday’s cycling and will if they don’t clean it up.

We were thinking about season tickets. I even marked my 2023 planner to get right on it in February, but need to reconsider after last Saturday. Maybe a couple of single games and drop it altogether if we see another rigged game. Disgusting stuff.
 
#315      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
Imagine if we beat UM and then they beat OSU…that could potentially knock the BIG out of the CFP…it’s just too much for the BIG to risk losing. Honestly, a one loss BIG would probably be in, but can you chance it?
Yes I can , and I expect a fairly contested game with the winner EARNING THE VICTORY instead of officials and B$G officials determining the outcome...

how about the overweight commissioner and all the other parties involved in the fix go suit up and go on the field and play the game themselves....

What has this country devolved into ?????......Where games are fixed and all the hard work a team has put in to pull an upset , being denied because the playoff purse would be less.........Sounds like a society of selling their soul for the almighty $$$$$$............

I understand corruption in government and the whole political system , with election deniers and insurrectionists trying to overthrow our democracy ....They did it right in front of everybody , but why has it made it's way into the sports realm ???.....Oh wait , it's been there all along but now it's accelerated to the next level of telling us not to believe what we see or read.......

HMMM , where have I heard this before ????????....................This country has lost it's innocence and now is full of whoever yells loudest or lies the most is the section of society that prosper's the most................

I say scrap the playoff as it exists and come up with a more equal system that's fair for all and not rigged for the rotten blue bloods.........

JMHO.................
 
#317      
I was listening J. Lehman talk about the Mi game. He was spot on with his analysis of the game. We know OPI and DPI are subjective in the eyes of the ref. Holding on an OL is also a quick response by the ref. Do the refs sit there and think each play is this the one I cheat on. Probably not. The pick play was so obvious that a non football player would know that it was a pick. They call it all the time if it is over the middle. Loveland the MI TE made no nada zilch attempt to look like he was going out for a pass. Oh well the game is over. On to NW. I want KY in Nashville for the bowl game. I want to say that this team has come so far in one year. Go ILLINI>
 
#320      
Ooooh yeah, forgot about the incomplete catch that was ruled a catch. That one is absolutely hard for me to explain.

But, everyone needs to understand the QB wasn’t down. That was the correct call.

Be pissed about the PI and the pick play (and to a lesser degree the incomplete catch ruled complete, although that one doesn’t change the outcome likely). But, the fumble recovery/QB not being down was likely the right call.
Not trying to be obstinate here and I really don't know because Hulu stopped replaying the game right after our first FG, but did he stand up before securing the ball, or did he secure the ball with his knee still down? If he did the latter, isn't he down?
 
#321      
I watched Harbaugh’s talk to the media after the game. I didn’t hear any compliments to the Illini team or to BB in his loss. Maybe I missed it. He was like a kid who won a pop Warner football conference championship. What a moron.
I just watched this also and had the exact same reaction. He blabbed ad nauseam about his player who transferred from Virginia and their loss, but not one word about BB's mother. Talk about having two hands tied behind you back. He didn't mention Illinois or one person from Illinois. He talked about his players having the physical strength of10 men and the mental strength or 10 men. What does that even mean? I'm sorry, but if someone takes you to the last minute at your house, you at least acknowledge that. (See the UVA BB coach after our game). I have no doubt that it's attitudes like this throughout the Fishigan staff that directly impacted the tunnel incident.
 
#322      
Not trying to be obstinate here and I really don't know because Hulu stopped replaying the game right after our first FG, but did he stand up before securing the ball, or did he secure the ball with his knee still down? If he did the latter, isn't he down?
Ball hit the ground before he secured it- pretty obvious incomplete pass
 
#323      
I was referring to the picture of the quarterback with knee down. Some were arguing that he didn't have possession and control of the ball and as such the play continues. My point was that if he can s co from of the ball with his knee still down, the whistle should be blown.
 
#324      
Not trying to be obstinate here and I really don't know because Hulu stopped replaying the game right after our first FG, but did he stand up before securing the ball, or did he secure the ball with his knee still down? If he did the latter, isn't he down?
The picture shows his hand touching the ball while his knee is on the ground. But it both real time, and in slo-mo, he never had re-possession of the ball until his knee was off the ground. It's just a well-timed photo that's been used to support a narrative. There is still plenty to be pissed about the game last week, but that one thing is not.
 
#325      

ChazzReinhold

Mom! The Meatloaf!
The picture shows his hand touching the ball while his knee is on the ground. But it both real time, and in slo-mo, he never had re-possession of the ball until his knee was off the ground. It's just a well-timed photo that's been used to support a narrative. There is still plenty to be pissed about the game last week, but that one thing is not.
If possession was ultimately achieved, wouldn’t then the initial point of contact with the ball be the genesis of that possession.