Pregame: Illinois at Iowa, Saturday, November 18th, 2:30pm CT, FS1

Status
Not open for further replies.
#53      
Wally Pipp was a great player who did nothing wrong as well.
(I get that college is different in that one has 0 years of eligibility left and one is your presumed QB of the future, just a joke)
 
#54      
I think Coach B will do the smart thing. Hold his cards very close this week, make Iowa prepare for both Luke and John (and Mathew and Mark too if we had them), then give John most of the reps in practice and the starting qb job vs the Hawkeyes. I like Luke, but John just makes our offense so much more explosive with his quick release, ability to find the open man, and accuracy on short, midrange, and long passes. Preparing for two very different styles of play is much tougher (Luke being the better runner), and the Illini need any edge they can get against the best defense we will face this year.
Agree with you, and we could even also mix both of them in to the game plan. Put Luke in for his ability to scramble if Iowa is able to pressure Paddock or he looks shaky after the first few series for whatever reason. Hopefully he won't, but let's get creative and give their D a lot to prepare for and force them to play against two different styles maybe.
 
#56      
The only reason I can see starting Altmyer is his legs. Paddock killed you a few times today cause he had little mobility. Luke gives you that. Also we might have the need for a QB who's running around a lot unless we think our OL will dominate in pass protection against Iowa's vaunted defense. I think the bigger question marks are we need feagin back and at mostly full health and Bryant too. We need all the weapons we can get against Iowa. Love and Isiah are great of course but we need everyone.
 
#58      

band camp

STL City
Paddock=Ditka
da bears GIF
 
#59      
The only reason I can see starting Altmyer is his legs. Paddock killed you a few times today cause he had little mobility. Luke gives you that. Also we might have the need for a QB who's running around a lot unless we think our OL will dominate in pass protection against Iowa's vaunted defense. I think the bigger question marks are we need feagin back and at mostly full health and Bryant too. We need all the weapons we can get against Iowa. Love and Isiah are great of course but we need everyone.
He did?
 
#60      
The only reason I can see starting Altmyer is his legs. Paddock killed you a few times today cause he had little mobility. Luke gives you that. Also we might have the need for a QB who's running around a lot unless we think our OL will dominate in pass protection against Iowa's vaunted defense. I think the bigger question marks are we need feagin back and at mostly full health and Bryant too. We need all the weapons we can get against Iowa. Love and Isiah are great of course but we need everyone.
I may be wrong in interpreting today's game, but I can only think of one literal thing Paddock did wrong today: that god awful interception (which I feel was a poor throw rather than a poor judgement). His lack of mobility didn't affect anything.

I'm not sure what the hell we do next week at QB. All I know is that if we win, it'll be a great decision, but if we lose... I feel bad for the guy who starts.
 
#63      
So, we are the highest scoring team in the B1G West, Iowa is the lowest.
We have the second highest points scored against us in the B1G West, Iowa has the least.

We're about to see what happens when an extremely stoppable force meets an extremely movable object...

Not sure this game will have the same entertainment factor the last few have provided, regardless of outcome.
 
#66      
There is absolutely no way...NO WAY...you take a hand this hot out until it is no longer hot. John Paddock has to decide when this magnificent orange joy ride is over.

Taking him out now would be the worst coaching decision in the history of coaching decisions.
 
Last edited:
#67      
All the circumstances are right to go with Paddock. If Luke were healthy for Indiana, then he def would have started.

But, since he didn't, and Paddock played great, now Luke is coming back from 2 weeks no game action, off a concussion...

I have a feeling BB, who presumably is well-liked and trusted by both QBs, will present his decision to start the hot hand in a tactful and agreeable way that satisfies both guys.

And if Paddock has a stinker in the first half, we'll see Luke in the second.
 
#70      
Tricky spot for BB.

Have the old adage of no player should lose his job due to injury on one side, as well as the fact I wouldn't doubt there was some kind of, "You're our guy." deal with LA when he came over.

And on the other side, have the fact that Paddock is playing better than LA has or could at this point, and the team isn't blind. Not sure what kind of message it sends the team if you start LA. In my mind, it makes it seem like the best players won't play necessarily, and that's not very inspiring/good for recruiting. He could lean on the injury thing though if called into question. If I was LA, I would go to BB and tell him to start Paddock - I think the team would really respect him for it, and it's not like Paddock is going to be here next year - feel like it would be a lot more problematic of a situation if he was (in regards to who to start next week). If Paddock bombs in the first half, could pop LA in and call the experiment over.

You kind of have to be honest with yourself when a dude leads a game winning drive and follows it up with a 500+ yard win...
 
#73      
Tricky spot for BB.

Have the old adage of no player should lose his job due to injury on one side, as well as the fact I wouldn't doubt there was some kind of, "You're our guy." deal with LA when he came over.

And on the other side, have the fact that Paddock is playing better than LA has or could at this point, and the team isn't blind. Not sure what kind of message it sends the team if you start LA. In my mind, it makes it seem like the best players won't play necessarily, and that's not very inspiring/good for recruiting. He could lean on the injury thing though if called into question. If I was LA, I would go to BB and tell him to start Paddock - I think the team would really respect him for it, and it's not like Paddock is going to be here next year - feel like it would be a lot more problematic of a situation if he was (in regards to who to start next week). If Paddock bombs in the first half, could pop LA in and call the experiment over.

You kind of have to be honest with yourself when a dude leads a game winning drive and follows it up with a 500+ yard win...
I agree 100%. Perfect situation for BB. Start Paddock, which the recent history and fandom dictate you do. If it doesn't go well, insert LA. Doing the opposite just would not be a good look on the coaching staffs part if it doesn't work out. In my mind, it's a no-brainer!
 
#75      
Letting them score was the right decision. It didn’t work out as Tepper had hoped, but it was definitely the right call.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.