Terrence Shannon Jr. suspended

Status
Not open for further replies.
#676      
On the lighter side, I was in Kams way back when (1981?) as an underage 19 or 20 year old who HAD been legal to drink in Illinois a year or two prior. I spotted then gov Jim Thompson in there, and starting bitching to him about raising the drinking age. His response, "You're in here, aren't you?"
Touche.
The governor was in Kam's? I like the sound of the 80s
 
#679      

MustangWally

Mayfield
Leaving the specifics of this issue aside for a moment – I want to say that this has been one of the best threads on this forum in some time. Again, not for the troubling matter itself, but in how posters here have largely treated it.

Most all the takes have been reasoned, thoughtful, and heartfelt. And many very informative about the legalities and implications involved. Many expressions of concern for everyone involved and for the welfare of the Illini program itself.

And if you wonder how Illini Nation here has treated this issue... just think about some other fan bases on other sites and how they would have reacted and expressed themselves. Not a pretty picture.

Illini Nation has some of the very best fans (if not THE best) in all of college roundball. All you guys and ladies have got credit coming to you.

There is great deal of good in this program and in the Illini fan base. And you have just proven that once again.
I'm sure Dan has been keeping a close eye on this thread.
 
#682      
So, weird factoid about myself… I was a juror on not one, but two very major crimes cases (including the Curt Lovelace murder trial in Springfield).

I will tell you right now that what the DA/state/etc thinks is good evidence… is often times not. I have twice seen the state bring charges against a person where the evidence was sketchy at best.

I have to imagine in a situation like this, evidence is even less than that.

Unfortunately, I have a similar experience as a juror. Really made me appreciate that juries are designed to be an independent check on anything going on behind the scenes.
 
#683      
I live about 30 minutes Southeast of Lawrence and my wife, a KU alum, has multiple family members who work in Douglas County Law Enforcement. Here's some details:

1. The chick alleging the rape and intercourse without consent was NOT a KU student. Kind of a fascinating side note to this story and similar stories out of Lawrence involving student-athletes. The "victims" are almost always young minority women from Kansas City, Kansas or Topeka. The hot blonde KU sorority chicks from Leawood aren't the women levying out assault accusations at student-athletes. Interestingly enough, when a KU student-athlete also gets some woman pregnant, it is almost 100% someone in this crowd.


2. I've heard the Douglas County DA was initially hesitant about filing charges over credibility concerns regarding the allegations and the victim. And if you know anything about Susan Valdez, she usually jumps all over any type of rape case. The discussion among the local law enforcement is this victim wanted a relationship or something more from Shannon, and when he ghosted her, she started hurling allegations. he also apologized via electronic communication which could be considered an admission of guilt and that's why the DA decided to follow through with the charges.

I feel like Shannon and maybe even the Illini's 2023-24 season is likely shot. But, I do believe he will be ok in the future. I don't think this case will ever go to trial, and I absolutely believe he will never be convicted.

Sorry, but this one makes absolutely zero sense to me. So this girl had unconsensual sex with TSJ, but wanted to pursue a relationship with him? When he said no/ghosted her, suddenly she presses charges?

Quite a person that wants to be in a relationship with their rapist and only shouts out that it was rape when the rapist doesn’t want the relationship.

I can’t imagine the police would even take this seriously if they had the communication.

“Hey I want to be in a relationship with you”

“Sorry, I don’t want one with you”

“well then I no longer consent to the sex we I'm filing rape charges against you!”

It also really doesn’t line up with the overall timeline to me as far as it happening in September and investigation ongoing since Sept.
 
#685      
I do wonder... if we are in one of the good timelines and a grand jury declines to indict, would that enough proof of innocence in the eyes of the media? The DIA?
It appears that you don't need to indict, and can proceed by filing an "Information," just like the procedure employed in many Illinois counties.
 
#686      
I would expect JW to only discuss timeline of what/when the DIA learned, how it responded according to the student and school policies that are in place, and what school procedures mandate going forward. I don’t think it’s going to be compelling TV.

Any details about “what happened” and/or the legal process in Kansas, will come from TSJ’s lawyers, at a time and manner of their choosing.
 
#688      
Sorry, but this one makes absolutely zero sense to me. So this girl had unconsensual sex with TSJ, but wanted to pursue a relationship with him? When he said no/ghosted her, suddenly she presses charges?

Quite a person that wants to be in a relationship with their rapist and only shouts out that it was rape when the rapist doesn’t want the relationship.

I can’t imagine the police would even take this seriously if they had the communication.

“Hey I want to be in a relationship with you”

“Sorry, I don’t want one with you”

“well then I no longer consent to the sex we I'm filing rape charges against you!”

It also really doesn’t line up with the overall timeline to me as far as it happening in September and investigation ongoing since Sept.
Take the "unconsensual" out of your post and and the post you're addressing makes all kinds of sense.

Of all the scenarios presented so far, State of Chicago just really rings true. That's why Brad and Josh saw nothing wrong with letting Shannon play. They didn't think it was going anywhere. Not to say that B&J didn't sit down and have a long talk with Shannon...
 
#689      

GallopingGhost

Denver, CO
I think a lot of people here are vying, angling, just blind wishing? for a possible return from TSJ this season. It’s just not likely, not at all.

I think a lawyer posted here earlier already that if there is a long process of hearings, even before going to trial. This wasn’t just an accusation. This was a charge. With witnesses ready to testify the story.

I want him back as bad as the next guy but this will not be a 3 month process, and this is not a situation in which Josh or Brad would reinstate him before the justice system clears him. even if he pleas the lesser charge, he’s likely still suspended. Only situation of a “short term” suspension is a dropped charge. Which seems unlikely.

We need to look forward, support TJ until the truth comes out, and focus on the team we have and the road ahead.
 
#690      

illinifan31

Former Krush Cow
South Bend, IN
I saw that text shown in the tweet hours before it was tweeted but in an extra layer of screen shot. I have no idea on it's veracity, but that person didn't make it up or photoshop anything. That image of the event description is floating around all over.
 
#692      
Unfortunately, I have a similar experience as a juror. Really made me appreciate that juries are designed to be an independent check on anything going on behind the scenes.
The scary part of it is a DA with an agenda can do a ton of damage to a person even in a jury eventually finds them innocent. Not saying that is the case here, just in general.
 
#693      
This type of thing can take AGES to resolve. His season is over.
Absolutely correct. Two Ohio State football players were charged with rape for an incident that happened in February of 2o20 and they went to trial in February of 2023. Both found not guilty but they lost their opportunity to compete. This will not be resolved soon unless there is a plea deal or a withdrawal of the charges against him. I would rate both as unlikely.
 
#694      
I wonder how long the people managing NIL start providing body guards and handlers to ensure this doesn't happen to their investments? Pro players do this.

And something additional is also needed.

Most anyone in the Corporate World today is subjected to training seminars about how to conduct yourself at all times and avoid words and situations that could constitute harassment and the like. Conducting a proper atmosphere and avoiding lawsuits and potential media difficulties and such.

Players today are going to need deeper corporate-level training in such matters since they are now virtual professionals with a need for handlers and public relations people and money advisers. At the very least, athletes are now personal ‘corporate’ entities unto themselves and they will need all of the associated corporate-style arms to serve and protect them.

Athletes need greater counseling and advising on how to handle fame, fortune, temptation, and being major public figures.

Not only is this Shannon issue going to be personal to the Illini family... but it should have wider-reaching implications for the college sports business in general.

One has to wonder how many phones have rung and texts sent all around the Nation from sports insiders to their given people and institutions.
 
#695      
Even if they 100 percent believe that TSJ is innocent, the University is not going to say, "Our star player is facing a rape charge that carries a maximum 54-year prison sentence, but we checked it out (how?) and think it's all bogus, so he'll be starting tonight."

Short of a full dismissal of all charges prior to the end of the season, his final game as an Illini was in St. Louis last week.
And what a game it was.
 
#696      

Illini92and96

Austin, TX
Take it for what it’s worth, but my grapevine (friend’s kid who knew about sky and Epps beforehand) tied to the story told here, with an added wrinkle she has done this type of thing multiple time before. *IF* that were the case, it changes everything and makes it sound like a duke lacrosse situation.
 
Last edited:
#697      
Sorry, but this one makes absolutely zero sense to me. So this girl had unconsensual sex with TSJ, but wanted to pursue a relationship with him? When he said no/ghosted her, suddenly she presses charges?

Quite a person that wants to be in a relationship with their rapist and only shouts out that it was rape when the rapist doesn’t want the relationship.

I can’t imagine the police would even take this seriously if they had the communication.

“Hey I want to be in a relationship with you”

“Sorry, I don’t want one with you”

“well then I no longer consent to the sex we I'm filing rape charges against you!”

It also really doesn’t line up with the overall timeline to me as far as it happening in September and investigation ongoing since Sept.
Unfortunately, men and women have consensual one night stands one person may not want to date or a relationship
(especially when the live 8 hours away or traveling) but some may. If this report is correct an 18 year old woman in this case or others in these situatoins like in my past may or did. In the past I've seen from others that were hurt emotionally for choosing to have a one night stand be livid a few times spread lies and rumors about others but the difference is they just talked crap or were emotional. They didn't cry rape after they were rejected. I don't know if that tweet is true but that type of thing has happens and one party can be very upset by rejection the days or weeks after.
If JW and BU have known of this situation for months and didn't kick him off the team this would be one of the few scenarios were he could play. If the evidence or information said otherwise he would have been booted long ago.
Anyway, hopefully the details can be sorted out and I still can't see TSJ raping anyone. I just don't buy it.
 
Last edited:
#698      
Except stacking juries does happen. A friend (who is a defense attorney) recently had an issue where all jurors of a certain race were asked to be replaced by the prosecution. After the 5th, the judge warned the prosecution because it was blatant.

Jury selection procedures make it impossible for one side or the other to stack a jury. Both sides receive a limited number of "peremptory challanges," 7 each in felony cases if my old retired memory still works, which allow them to remove a juror without articulating a reason for excusing them, but when those are gone the only thing remaining are "challanges for cause," and those are not routinely granted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.