So you're saying the most developed upperclassmen are better than freshman?
I never would have guessed.
I'm giving you a hard time but we can find hundreds of 3 star recruits who never became any of the guys listed above.
I don't think anyone here thinks recruiting rankings are an exact science but history would show that landing higher rated recruits is more likely, in general, to correlate to program success.
No one here on loyalty is ever preoccupied with recruiting rankings? Sure.
I was only pointing out the current outstanding players in the conference that were not highly recruited.