I don’t think anyone has an issue with trading LaVine (or Vuc or Ball) — I surely don’t. That was the worst kept secret in the NBA. My issue is they putzed around trading those guys to the point that the team was in jeopardy of losing its first rounder to SA. So they had to trade LaVine for a pick they already should have had.the only hope of winning is a clean slate. trading LaVine had to happen, if only for a ham sammich. Vuc's gonna get moved by the deadline. Ball is on an expiring contract. clean slate. but tearing it down is the easy part. they have to get lucky and make shrewd decisions. are you confident? rebuild city, here we come
As far as I can tell, this means that they no longer owe SA a frp, so don't have to sweat losing next year's or the year after's top 8 protected pick to them either.I don’t think anyone has an issue with trading LaVine (or Vuc or Ball) — I surely don’t. That was the worst kept secret in the NBA. My issue is they putzed around trading those guys to the point that the team was in jeopardy of losing its first rounder to SA. So they had to trade LaVine for a pick they already should have had.
If they had traded LaVine and Vuc in offseason and just tanked like they should have, they’d have that first pick plus whatever draft capital they would have have gotten in those deals. Maybe they couldn’t have traded both in offseason, but I’d be surprised if they couldn’t have traded one of them, which likely would have been enough to keep their first round pick safe.
Correct, but like I said, if front office wasn’t inept and started cleaning house this past offseason, next year’s pick wouldn’t have been in jeopardy and likely not the year after’s. So basically all they got for LaVine was insurance that their ineptness didn’t bite them in the a$$.As far as I can tell, this means that they no longer owe SA a frp, so don't have to sweat losing next year's or the year after's top 8 protected pick to them either.
the only hope of winning is a clean slate...
Signing LaVine to the contract they did was the mistake. They weren’t going to get anything in return other than begging someone else to pay him. In a year they will be trying to hope someone wants to take Patrick Williams and his $18 million a year. I doubt they will be as lucky as they were with LaVine.Correct, but like I said, if front office wasn’t inept and started cleaning house this past offseason, next year’s pick wouldn’t have been in jeopardy and likely not the year after’s. So basically all they got for LaVine was insurance that their ineptness didn’t bite them in the a$$.
I don’t know what they could have got for LaVine this past offseason, but I don’t think a future first and a second rounder or two/three is an unreasonable expectation. So say they got a 2028 first rounder and 2025 and 2027 second rounders. With no LaVine, 2025 first to SA would have been safe (and likely a fair amount higher than it will be in what is considered a very good draft at top). Doesn’t eliminate risk of losing first rounder in 2026, but in a full rebuild that they would have been in, good chance that pick wouldn’t have been at risk either. And they’d have the draft capital I mentioned instead of 3 guys who likely won’t be with team past next year. Heck even if the only got a couple/few second rounders for LaVine this past offseason, they’d still be better off.
If you put together a team that you hope will contend and it doesn't work out, don't you trade those pieces to teams hoping to contend, AND GET SOMETHING BACK?
Yeah, kind of agree, but since when does FO take any kind of risk?Correct, but like I said, if front office wasn’t inept and started cleaning house this past offseason, next year’s pick wouldn’t have been in jeopardy and likely not the year after’s. So basically all they got for LaVine was insurance that their ineptness didn’t bite them in the a$$.
I don’t know what they could have got for LaVine this past offseason, but I don’t think a future first and a second rounder or two/three is an unreasonable expectation. So say they got a 2028 first rounder and 2025 and 2027 second rounders. With no LaVine, 2025 first to SA would have been safe (and likely a fair amount higher than it will be in what is considered a very good draft at top). Doesn’t eliminate risk of losing first rounder in 2026, but in a full rebuild that they would have been in, good chance that pick wouldn’t have been at risk either. And they’d have the draft capital I mentioned instead of 3 guys who likely won’t be with team past next year. Heck even if the only got a couple/few second rounders for LaVine this past offseason, they’d still be better off.
Yeah, kind of agree, but since when does FO take any kind of risk?
Ayo has been discussed as a possible trade chip also. In addition to Vuc and Lonzo.Get rid of everyone except Ayo. He's the soul of this franchise. Everyone else is just a bad fit.
DislikeAyo has been discussed as a possible trade chip also. In addition to Vuc and Lonzo.
As someone who lives in the Chicago area I like having Ayo around, but for Ayo's career it might be best to be elsewhere. I don't think the Bulls will be competing anytime soon. On the plus side, he would get a lot of tick, but on the minus side, he might rather be a contributor to a team with something to play for than a key player on a team playing for the draft.Dislike
I would hope every player is being discussed as a possible trade chip. Ayo is certainly at the bottom of a list of players I’d like to see traded and hope he stays with Bulls, but the shape the Bulls are in no one should be untouchable. Main issue I’d have with Ayo being traded is that I have no confidence that front office would get the value needed to include him in a trade.Ayo has been discussed as a possible trade chip also. In addition to Vuc and Lonzo.
Serious question for you and many of the posters on here. Would you feel the same about Ayo if he didn't play at Illinois?I would hope every player is being discussed as a possible trade chip. Ayo is certainly at the bottom of a list of players I’d like to see traded and hope he stays with Bulls, but the shape the Bulls are in no one should be untouchable. Main issue I’d have with Ayo being traded is that I have no confidence that front office would get the value needed to include him in a trade.
No. I like his game, but no doubt that the enjoyment I get seeing his development is fueled by the “personal” connection I feel based on him being an Illini. So while I’d like to see him remain a Bull, if they can get good value for him I’d get over the disappointment relatively quick. And a trade could put him in the position to be playing in meaningful games in the postseason.Serious question for you and many of the posters on here. Would you feel the same about Ayo if he didn't play at Illinois?