I've been hard on Ben during some of our more frustrating games (and probably worded some things poorly in the heat of the moment, no doubt) ... but I have also been hard on KJ, who is probably our best player. So, I at least like to think I am not "picking on" Ben. And while I admit I am not this Xs and Os guru, you said it yourself that he was brought here to shoot (and make) threes. Thus, my main issue is that when he's not making them, there is an excellent argument to be made that there are better guys to have out there. Put another way, we never would have taken a version of Ben that shoots 30% from three, so when that's happening (or worse), he needs to sit, at least for a little. I get that there is a fine line between pulling a shooter and letting him figure it out, but the fact is we have some guys on the bench who are capable of stepping up when Ben's not feeling his shot. And I think that is people's main issue. I recognize he's played some good defense at times, and he obviously always gives pretty good effort!
FWIW, there is anecdotal evidence that Ben might be settling into his shot and getting out of a funk. The progression since Nebraska is very encouraging.
0.0% at Nebraska on 7 attempts
33.3% vs. Ohio State on 3 attempts
37.5% at Rutgers on 8 attempts
50.0% at Minnesota on 4 attempts
40.0% vs. UCLA on 5 attempts
From the USC to Nebraska games, Ben hit 27.3% of his threes, and that number was pushed up by a 4/9 performance vs. Northwestern ... he shot under 35.0% in four of those games, including a real bad 0 for 7 at Nebraska.
However, since the Nebraska game, Ben has hit exactly 40.0% of his threes, and there has been way less inconsistency. If he is doing that, it goes without saying that he is a VERY valuable part of this team.