It's quite simple. Without Stephen Gentry on the bench, don't expect any adjustments.
Remember, Underwood was struggling big time at Ok State. They (Stephen Gentry) made an adjustment, and the team took off ending very strongly. Gentry got Underwood the job here. Then when we adjusted our defense here, because remember we were awful the first couple of Underwood years, guess who.
From what insiders relayed, Gentry is probably a dork. Didn't mesh well with the other assistants, so Underwood took the recruiters and let the strategist go to Gonzaga. I'd assume if we had 5 coaches back then, we'd have kept Gentry around. But without Gentry on our bench, we have not adjusted at all.
And I still keep coming back to last year. People say well look at last year, that proves.... I don't agree. Last year we had a stud just play hero ball over and over and over, and he kept making it work. We had a second guy that was bigger and stronger than most people who guarded him and was able to make booty ball work over and over. Notice when Ben tries it, his defender often just pushes him back, and it doesn't work.
My fear is that last year was more a testament to the dominance of Terrance Shannon as college player than it was Underwood being a great coach. I would have said Underwood is a great GM. He can get the players and coaches, though this year I'm very suspect of the coaches. But he is not a bench coach. Hey being a great GM will win you a ton of games. But my question ultimately becomes, in an NIL world, can any coach land a group of studs with the money we spend? And then, can a better bench coach perform better, even if they don't land the exact same quality of players, because our NIL will always land us a top 5 talent roster in conference.