Illini in Italy
- Illini HQ, Florida Panhandle
Loyalty . . .
My simple thinking is strength can be gained, but athleticism is innate. Both have the potential that qualifies them to at least go in the first round, at least too much for all 30 teams to pass up.Was reading what some of the draft scouts are saying about some of the top prospects.
Biggest question they have with KJ is whether his athleticism will limit him as a starting point guard. They question whether he can create advantages physically as he's not the fastest or strongest. Right now most of his plays in the paint are coming off of ball screens.
With Riley, it's something that I'm sure many of us have mentioned on here and that's his lack of strength. They don't doubt that he can be a quality NBA shooter, especially off the bounce (even if his efficiency leaves a lot to be desired). And he can certainly play. But his strength is going to be a huge worry for NBA teams.
My simple thinking is strength can be gained, but athleticism is innate. Both have the potential that qualifies them to at least go in the first round, at least too much for all 30 teams to pass up.
I am not high on Kaspar J as far as the NBA is concerned. Doesn't seem quick enough. Reminds me of Steve Alford back in the day. Alford wasn't quick enough to play in NBA while his similar contemporary Steve Kerr played like 12 years in the NBA. Steve was quick enough to play.
I would imagine that NBA teams will look at Riley and feel like they can continue to add muscle to him. As much as we rightly laud Adam Fletcher's work with the team, I have to think a NBA sports performance program plus full-time focus on basketball as opposed to "most of the time" will bring even greater results.Was reading what some of the draft scouts are saying about some of the top prospects.
Biggest question they have with KJ is whether his athleticism will limit him as a starting point guard. They question whether he can create advantages physically as he's not the fastest or strongest. Right now most of his plays in the paint are coming off of ball screens.
With Riley, it's something that I'm sure many of us have mentioned on here and that's his lack of strength. They don't doubt that he can be a quality NBA shooter, especially off the bounce (even if his efficiency leaves a lot to be desired). And he can certainly play. But his strength is going to be a huge worry for NBA teams.
I have been told on here, and believed myself, he was a surefire 1st rounder. Is the overall zeitgeist shifting on his draft stock or is this some anomaly?Vecenie newest big board has Will Riley at #49.
KJ 5, Tomi 56Vecenie newest big board has Will Riley at #49.
Also, his limited role early and recent growth will be taken into account. I bet he goes to the workouts. I wouldn't be surprised if he turns some heads in those. You don't have to squint very hard to envision him as a 12–15-year starter in the Association.KJ 5, Tomi 56
![]()
2025 NBA Draft Big Board: Derik Queen, V.J. Edgecombe rise among top 100 prospects
Cooper Flagg is unquestionably the No. 1 player in this draft class. Things will get interesting quickly after the top few picks.www.nytimes.com
Riley is a tricky one to project NBA-wise. Very fluid athlete that gets through traffic and to the rim like an NBA player and has an innate scoring gene. Obvious NBA wing body. But he's very skinny, very raw, and just has a weird herky-jerkiness to his game.
Vecenie newest big board has Will Riley at #49.
Love Riley but he is not smooth, quick, or strong with the ball. Seems a bit indecisive and despite being herky-jerky he puts the ball in the hoop. Also, don't consider him a plus defender. Don't watch a minute of NBA but hard to see him as 1st round draft pick (right now).KJ 5, Tomi 56
![]()
2025 NBA Draft Big Board: Derik Queen, V.J. Edgecombe rise among top 100 prospects
Cooper Flagg is unquestionably the No. 1 player in this draft class. Things will get interesting quickly after the top few picks.www.nytimes.com
Riley is a tricky one to project NBA-wise. Very fluid athlete that gets through traffic and to the rim like an NBA player and has an innate scoring gene. Obvious NBA wing body. But he's very skinny, very raw, and just has a weird herky-jerkiness to his game.
All this are fluid, I will say probably only the 1-8 are close to a lock.Surprised by this.....![]()
But you can see his growth this year and his potential. He's going harder to the hoop than he did earlier in the year and less indecisive. He's a pro. It's just a matter of teams wanting to wait a year as he builds strength or take him and develop him earlier.Love Riley but he is not smooth, quick, or strong with the ball. Seems a bit indecisive and despite being herky-jerky he puts the ball in the hoop. Also, don't consider him a plus defender. Don't watch a minute of NBA but hard to see him as 1st round draft pick (right now).
Going back to school makes so much sense for Riley. He’s young so another year in which he gains mass and gets an opportunity to be the guy is a logical choice. Getting mocked in the mid-late 2nd at this stage should lead to that conversation for his camp imoVecenie newest big board has Will Riley at #49.
correct - I see the upside potential but the current product is very raw.But you can see his growth this year and his potential. He's going harder to the hoop than he did earlier in the year and less indecisive. He's a pro. It's just a matter of teams wanting to wait a year as he builds strength or take him and develop him earlier.
Sure, but Davis was a 1st team All-American & POY candidate. He wasn't going to develop much further in college.I will remind everyone that Johnny Davis got taken 10th. (I laughed at the screen when it happened.) Never doubt the willingness of teams to draft a guy so clearly unprepared for the league in the hopes of developing him.
Sure, but Davis was a 1st team All-American & POY candidate. He wasn't going to develop much further in college.
And NBA teams have successfully developed tons of players. Devin Booker didn't start a single game in college, and while he played well, was far from a complete player. He went 13th, which in retrospect was a steal.
Yeah, but Luka Garza got the accolades and went second round, they don't mean actually mean a whole lot. And "He wasn't going to develop much further in college" could apply to a spectrum of players, it'd be like trying to sell Ben Humrichous to teams because he surely isn't developing any further in college.Sure, but Davis was a 1st team All-American & POY candidate. He wasn't going to develop much further in college.
And NBA teams have successfully developed tons of players. Devin Booker didn't start a single game in college, and while he played well, was far from a complete player. He went 13th, which in retrospect was a steal.
I think he declares, get's feedback, and returns.KJ 5, Tomi 56
![]()
2025 NBA Draft Big Board: Derik Queen, V.J. Edgecombe rise among top 100 prospects
Cooper Flagg is unquestionably the No. 1 player in this draft class. Things will get interesting quickly after the top few picks.www.nytimes.com
Riley is a tricky one to project NBA-wise. Very fluid athlete that gets through traffic and to the rim like an NBA player and has an innate scoring gene. Obvious NBA wing body. But he's very skinny, very raw, and just has a weird herky-jerkiness to his game.
Yeah, but Luka Garza got the accolades and went second round, they don't mean actually mean a whole lot. And "He wasn't going to develop much further in college" could apply to a spectrum of players, it'd be like trying to sell Ben Humrichous to teams because he surely isn't developing any further in college.
Your second statement is what I'm saying- all it takes is one NBA team to think they can develop a player and he's drafted, and I think both KJ and Will Riley have a team out there for that.
Booker was a freshman playing behind the Harrison twins. He would have started everywhere else.Sure, but Davis was a 1st team All-American & POY candidate. He wasn't going to develop much further in college.
And NBA teams have successfully developed tons of players. Devin Booker didn't start a single game in college, and while he played well, was far from a complete player. He went 13th, which in retrospect was a steal.