rmlsr
- El Paso,IL
Yeah Underwood has had 2 bad seasons in the last 3 years. Not goodThe point of my post was simple:
Even good, highly accomplished coaches, have bad seasons.
Yeah Underwood has had 2 bad seasons in the last 3 years. Not goodThe point of my post was simple:
Even good, highly accomplished coaches, have bad seasons.
I think this is the correct take. You make changes to staff and get actual assistant coaches but you don't move on from Brad unless he desperately wants out or you know you have a proven better option in place on a handshake deal.Agree. If you know it is a bonafide upgrade and there unfortunately are not too many of them. If the perfect situation presents itself then yes, you make the move. I just dont see that happening. In that case, moving forward with Brad is the better option. Last year all on this board were calling what Brad had accomplished, the greatest coaching stretch for the Illini other than Henson and the short time of Self (excluding the deep past). To completely 180 over 2 months just doesn’t make sense.
There you go, trying to inject some rational thought into a Loyalty discussion.The point of my post was simple:
Even good, highly accomplished coaches, have bad seasons.
Define generational. Seems like a lot of generational talent in a very short span there.Or more specifically the outlier of 2 generational talents.
Underwood was a loser at Illinois till Kofi arrived. Kofi’s don’t grow on trees. He’s a 1 in 30 year player.
TSJ’s 2023-24 was also generational. He was on the team in 22-23 and they weren’t very good. 1 player having an All Time year.
If you can only get good coaching results when you have generational talent, then you got the wrong guy. Bc we have not generational, but good talent this year, and the team isn’t good
KJ is like to be a first round one and done. I think that qualifies as generational in the same sense as multi-year Ayo, Kofi, and TSJ for us at this point. You could make the case for Ivisic and Riley as well.Or more specifically the outlier of 2 generational talents.
Underwood was a loser at Illinois till Kofi arrived. Kofi’s don’t grow on trees. He’s a 1 in 30 year player.
TSJ’s 2023-24 was also generational. He was on the team in 22-23 and they weren’t very good. 1 player having an All Time year.
If you can only get good coaching results when you have generational talent, then you got the wrong guy. Bc we have not generational, but good talent this year, and the team isn’t good
I would compare Brad to Lou. He took a dead in the water program and completely turned it around.Here's where the fundamental disagreement is. Wins means everything. It's always a matter of wanting more. If you're in the sweet 16 every year but lose, then you're labeled as not being able to win the big game because you can't get to a final four.
Purdue is crushing Painter right now. They're always underachieving in the Tournament(lost to a 16 seed two years ago), went to the title game last year and now.....they've lost four in a row and he's a bad coach again. They lose the NPOY....doesn't matter. We lose TJ and play four freshmen.... doesn't matter.
If Brad did ever leave, 90% of this board would melt down because NOTHING is a guarantee. BU has gotten our program where anything below a sweet 16 is unacceptable.
He did his job.
Very interesting point about Weber. I’m not a Weber fan but I’ll never say that the guy couldn’t coach. Where are we if NIL and the current facilities were available to him in 2005?Dude Bill Self was at Illinois for 3 seasons and his record is still better than Brad’s 8 years I’m sick and tired of the Brad Underwood cult members. Bruce Weber’s record is better than Brad . Weber didn’t have NIL or a brand new state of the art basketball facility. Brad ain’t it dude . Keep lying to yourself with mediocrity. Illinois will NEVER reach the Final 4 with Brad
not sure those were his issues. just seemed like he had more difficulty connecting with recruitsVery interesting point about Weber. I’m not a Weber fan but I’ll never say that the guy couldn’t coach. Where are we if NIL and the current facilities were available to him in 2005?
I imagine his 3 point accuracy was somewhat better than 30% as well60% of Podz' shots at Santa Clara were 2 pointers - 275 out of 460. He shot 5.8 3s per game, which was tied for 225th most in the NCAA that year.
not sure those were his issues. just seemed like he had more difficulty connecting with recruits
To be fair, Self inherited Kruger's players, who won a conference championship with and had three tourney appearances in Kruger's four years. Brad inherited a flaming pile of horsesh*t that took two years to turn around. After those two years he is 134-59 overall (.694), and 68-39 (.635) in the B1G. And while Weber had a better overall record at Illinois (.675), his B1G record was worse at .576 (BU's overall B1G is still better even if you include those first two years at .580). But don't let those facts interrupt your rant. No one is happy with the last two months of play, and given the fact that Illinois has reached only two Final Fours in the last 80 years, it really is almost Indiana-like expecting that we reach the FF with any coach. FYI, I'm not a Brad cult member, but I do recognize that he's the best coach we've had since Henson that has stayed for more than just a few years. If he leaves, on to the next coach candidate. But to push him out? Not today.Dude Bill Self was at Illinois for 3 seasons and his record is still better than Brad’s 8 years I’m sick and tired of the Brad Underwood cult members. Bruce Weber’s record is better than Brad . Weber didn’t have NIL or a brand new state of the art basketball facility. Brad ain’t it dude . Keep lying to yourself with mediocrity. Illinois will NEVER reach the Final 4 with Brad
He was also loyal to a fault with assistants.not sure those were his issues. just seemed like he had more difficulty connecting with recruits
Sounds familiar related to the present situation, at least with two in particular.He was also loyal to a fault with assistants.
The more I think about this, the more I am relating this to what Nick Sirianni was facing with the Eagles the year before the most recently concluded one (the year the Eagles lost to the Buccaneers in the wild card playoff). I see a lot of similarities between Sirianni and Underwood. Both are fiery, both have a pretty strong stubborn streak, both have a clearly defined vision of what they want to accomplish. The Eagles flamed out that season much like the Illini have done this season. Sirianni took a long look at himself and made a lot of changes. For example, he gave up play-calling duties to Kellen Moore when he brought Moore in as offensive coordinator.I think we all agree BU needs to bring in at least one good x&o guy. Will he listen to him? I suspect the reason Gentry is back at Gonzaga is 71-58 Loyola. When you won't listen to someone who knows what to do and insist on doing the same thing repeatedly it's not going to help much to have a high paid guy on the bench next to you.
So, you're saying we may not even make the basement this year? 17 wins to date with no guarantee of 3 more. Looking at the schedule, I wouldn't bet on 3 more.Who has? Give me a name, right now, that you can GUARANTEE us those results since you're future telling.
I'll take the guy who has made 20+ wins the basement of a season and pulled a complete dumpster fire of a program to this point of expectation.
Hey, you may get your wish. We'll see shortly.
This.Or more specifically the outlier of 2 generational talents.
Underwood was a loser at Illinois till Kofi arrived. Kofi’s don’t grow on trees. He’s a 1 in 30 year player.
TSJ’s 2023-24 was also generational. He was on the team in 22-23 and they weren’t very good. 1 player having an All Time year.
If you can only get good coaching results when you have generational talent, then you got the wrong guy. Bc we have not generational, but good talent this year, and the team isn’t good
Is it possible we promoted Hamer and Tyler because Underwood is having trouble finding more qualified assistants that want to work for him? His history with assistant coaches hasn't been the best as evidenced by the Chester and TA situations. Is his reputation preceding him? NO gaslighting, just an honest question.We can afford both … We simply didn’t capitalize on the move to 5 assistants … I made a post here and maybe someone can find it but I said this is the time to take advantage of this rule and gain a leg up, get some guys in here that can coach X&O and/or bring in a guy who’s tied in with elite talent …
Texas Tech uses this rule to their advantage … As does Ole Miss … Instead we promoted Hamer and Tyler …
This is the right take, assuming that Brad is willing to make the hard choices with respect to his coaching staff (any appearance of nepotism has to go away). Either way, the basketball program is set up for success, which is something that was not the case when Brad was brought in.To be fair, Self inherited Kruger's players, who won a conference championship with and had three tourney appearances in Kruger's four years. Brad inherited a flaming pile of horsesh*t that took two years to turn around. After those two years he is 134-59 overall (.694), and 68-39 (.635) in the B1G. And while Weber had a better overall record at Illinois (.675), his B1G record was worse at .576 (BU's overall B1G is still better even if you include those first two years at .580). But don't let those facts interrupt your rant. No one is happy with the last two months of play, and given the fact that Illinois has reached only two Final Fours in the last 80 years, it really is almost Indiana-like expecting that we reach the FF with any coach. FYI, I'm not a Brad cult member, but I do recognize that he's the best coach we've had since Henson that has stayed for more than just a few years. If he leaves, on to the next coach candidate. But to push him out? Not today.
Only if 44% is better than 30%.I imagine his 3 point accuracy was somewhat better than 30% as well