This is the kind of silly comment that makes people think anyone who doesn't go all-in on analytics is a philistine.I know Hamer likes stats and metrics. Anyone wanna tell him a % sign has never blocked a shot or caused a turnover?
Other than rolling my eyes at one of the most common grammatical errors (seriously, how do people not realize it’s “COULDN’T care less,” lol?!), I don’t think he meant it as a diss at all. I think he was saying he was just going to enjoy this moment and worry about the Illini tomorrow.![]()
Thoughts on the illini? - " I could care less" - Sean
Time to make him eat those words!
You can always count on them. Despise ESPNESPN being very fair to Illinois on this review sheet...
It's not a conspiracy. Those are all Q1A's from the NET team sheet.ESPN being very fair to Illinois on this review sheet...
Where? Kenpom is 5 and Vegas almost always opens at Kenpom.Opening line is Illinois - 2.5
WOW, not biased at all hahahaESPN being very fair to Illinois on this review sheet...
But these are also Quad 1AIt's not a conspiracy. Those are all Q1A's from the NET team sheet.
I guess that covers all the bases, doesn't it. Rock solid prediction.We should beat either of the teams that played tonight, but we could also easily lose to either one.
I was hoping like hell for Texas because the sh*t talking train was starting at my house, leaving every 5 minutes on time, and never stopping.Man I wanted to play whichever team that lost.
They listed 4 of Auburns 5 losses for me. The filter is a top tier hater
Ah. I was confused why Arkansas, Oregon, and Wisconsin wins were missing. I feel like ESPN used to highlight key wins and loses as well, not just straight highest NET games in a row. We have the worst one I saw of any team's.It's not a conspiracy. Those are all Q1A's from the NET team sheet.