No good place to put this, but thought it was interesting.
Half of the NEC is expected to move to D3No good place to put this, but thought it was interesting.
No good place to put this, but thought it was interesting.
I am okay with this. NIL, I have always believed, will be the death of NCAA basketball. All these wealthy people currently funding NIL across the land, as well as the collectives, will wither and die unless the conference Championships and NCAA births continue at an unrealistic pace. Not to mention the expectations at a school like UI. You all really think donors will continue to fund multi-million dollar rosters to only bow out in the NCAA's 1st weekend ???Won't be the last either. Many of the conferences in the northeast and mid-atlantic along with the HBCUs will likely have schools reclassify down because of how much NIL and the transfer portal have changed things.
Watching some of those conference tournaments like the SWAC, NEC, MEAC, heck even the MAAC and Patriot league.. the level of basketball doesn't feel like D1 at all.Won't be the last either. Many of the conferences in the northeast and mid-atlantic along with the HBCUs will likely have schools reclassify down because of how much NIL and the transfer portal have changed things.
Watching some of those conference tournaments like the SWAC, NEC, MEAC, heck even the MAAC and Patriot league.. the level of basketball doesn't feel like D1 at all.
Just spit balling here, but they did say that travel and the time away from campus were a consideration. Maybe there are more D3 schools concentrated in their area than D2. Ergo, less travel.But why skip D2?
D3 sets their own eligibility requirements instead of the NCAA and they don't give athletic scholarships. It's a true(r) student athlete. So I guess if they are going to de-emphasize sports why not go all the way. I can't imagine D2 brings in enough money for the extra expense in scholarship, travel, etc. associated with D3But why skip D2?
my guess it is about scholarships/money...D2 can give scholarships, D3 can't...so if you are planning on cutting out scholies then you likely aren't competitive in D2 either & at the end of the day does D2/D3 really matter in prestige? Also of interest, quick google search says 304 D2 basketball schools vs 431 D3...so seems to be the more popular landing spot.But why skip D2?
D2 still has athletic scholarships.But why skip D2?
At D3 level, I believe they don't even have to provide athletic scholarships. That's likely why.But why skip D2?
I'm assuming this also means that NIL is not a thing at D3?At D3 level, I believe they don't even have to provide athletic scholarships. That's likely why.
I'm a D3 coach for the last decade and I've not heard any talks about revenue sharing. No athletic scholarships given = zero money spent in terms of sharing revenue. It is all merit-based scholarships for academic pursuits and outside of presidential scholarship students, every student pays a decent sum of $$ out of pocket. The average out of pocket expense for my players is north of $15k with my lowest being about $4500 and my highest being nearer to $20k. Each receives $20-$27k in scholarships yearly from our school. I can promise you that the school turns a nice profit yearly and I'll save the cost of a college education for another rant haha.But why skip D2?
A (the?) silver lining in this could be that the push to further expand the NCAA tournament to 72 or 78 or whatever might disappear. Hell, maybe the field shrinks back to 64? I still hate the idea of the play-in games because of how it forces some automatic qualifiers to play for the right to go to the "real" tournament. I would be fine with the play-in games (such that they remain necessary...) if they only included the last of the at-large bids.Won't be the last either. Many of the conferences in the northeast and mid-atlantic along with the HBCUs will likely have schools reclassify down because of how much NIL and the transfer portal have changed things.
I think you may be right, assuming the wild wild west attitude about NIL continues unabatedA (the?) silver lining in this could be that the push to further expand the NCAA tournament to 72 or 78 or whatever might disappear. Hell, maybe the field shrinks back to 64? I still hate the idea of the play-in games because of how it forces some automatic qualifiers to play for the right to go to the "real" tournament. I would be fine with the play-in games (such that they remain necessary...) if they only included the last of the at-large bids.
Or, perhaps more likely, the shortsighted and money-driven nature of the NCAA will do the worst of both worlds - fewer automatic qualifiers due to conference shifts to DIII, and an additionally expanded field. We should probably begin preparing for this stupid outcome rather than for reason to prevail...
NIL does exist in D3I'm assuming this also means that NIL is not a thing at D3?
I am okay with this. NIL, I have always believed, will be the death of NCAA basketball. All these wealthy people currently funding NIL across the land, as well as the collectives, will wither and die unless the conference Championships and NCAA births continue at an unrealistic pace. Not to mention the expectations at a school like UI. You all really think donors will continue to fund multi-million dollar rosters to only bow out in the NCAA's 1st weekend ???
Not true.NIL does exist in D3
Why would there be limitations on NIL depending on what division you are in? If I'm an advertiser, all I care about is exposure and ROI from attaching my money to that Name, image, or likeness? I'm not saying it's not possible there are restrictions.... Just don't see whyNot true.
Article with some background. Definitely not limited to D1Why would there be limitations on NIL depending on what division you are in? If I'm an advertiser, all I care about is exposure and ROI from attaching my money to that Name, image, or likeness? I'm not saying it's not possible there are restrictions.... Just don't see why
It is true thoughNot true.