The constant insistence on replacing an assistant coach who has ran a top 3 offense last year and a top 15 offense this year because he is the son of the coach is silly to me
Why isn't this focus placed on the defensive mastermind who gave us the 80th ranked D last year and 40th ranked D this year?
I think it's placed on both and most people want Hamer gone very badly.
But go watch UConn's, Nebraska, Iowa, Purdue, Texas Tech, BYU, Florida, Gonzaga, or Alabama and legitimately watch how their offensives flow and move and tell me that you think Illinois is a well coached offensive team.
Yeah they have graded out well by the metrics but that's because they have had a ton of talent that last two years. Also, offensive efficiency doesn't necessarily tell the entire story when you light up teams like Iowa for 100+ points but struggle when you play teams that actually play physical defense. Plus, your offense is super volatile and puts you in position to lose games you have no business losing.
Metrics are great and can add a lot of context to why things work but you still need to watch games and other teams play to have the entire picture despite what the consultant class of this country may think.
If you gave Fred Hoiberg this Illinois roster this year he would have had the best offense in the country. Why is anyone excited about the 15th best offense with this roster? You had two extremely talented lottery pick type talents in KJ and Riley, an extremely skilled 7 footer that you can run your offense through and a ton of capable role players in Boswell, White, Morez, DGL, and Humrichous. The one thing they did very well was offensive rebound and basically all of Brad's teams have done that so I'm not going to credit Tyler.
Auburn has the 3rd best offense in the country and I don't know if they have a single NBA player. Like this Illini offense should have been a top 5ish offense, 15 is underselling the talent they had.